Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Inductive Method
3
Quantitative vs. Qualitative
Qualitative vs. Quantitative
Research
Qualitative Quantitative
Textual data Numerical data
Explore phenomena Confirm hypotheses
Flexible, Rigid, structured
unstructured Quantify variation,
Describe variation, predict
relationships, and relationships, and
individual and describe
group experiences characteristics
Qualitative Quantitative
6
Introduction
Qualitative research
Allows the researcher to understand a
problem or phenomenon from the
perspectives of the people it
involves.
Reveals a complete picture of a
certain research issue.
Seeks to provide a rich understanding
of a certain research issue.
What is Qualitative Research?
A holistic approach to questions--a
recognition that human realities
are complex. Broad questions.
The focus is on human experience
The research strategies used
generally feature sustained
contact with people in settings
where those people normally
spend their time. Contexts of
Human Behavior.
8
Qualitative Research
cont.
There is typically a high level of
researcher involvement with subjects;
strategies of participant observation
and in-depth, unstructured interviews
are often used.
The data produced provide a
description, usually narrative, of
people living through events in
situations.
Cited from Boyd, pp. 67-68 in Munhall, 2001
9
Characteristics of Qualitative
Research
Data collected with
Starts with general semi-structured and
question or problem unstructured
No pre-defined instruments
hypothesis Presents results
descriptively
Uses a purposeful Utilizes researchers
sample, not a awareness of own
random one orientations, biases,
experiences that might
Uses a relatively affect data collection
small sample and interpretation
10
Now we will write a good
qualitative purpose
statement:
What it includes:
Single sentence
The purpose of this study . . .
Central phenomenon
Qualitative words (e.g. explore,
understand, discover)
Participants
Research site
Independent Dependent
Variable influences Variable
Y
X Y
Central Phenomenon
relate
influence
impact
effect
cause
2.Observations
3.Documents
Based on Symbolic
Interactionism which posits
that humans act and interact
on the basis of symbols,
which have meaning and
value for the actors.
Systematic approach
Field Work
Key Informants
Thick description
Emic (insider group perspective) and
Etic (researchers interpretation of
social life).
Context important, need holistic view.
Need grounding in anthropology.
May incorporate
quantitative data and
archival documents.
Qualitative Research--Simpson 41
Spring 2006
Feminist Research is often classified in the
qualitative research family because:
It is used to generate new knowledge.
Its purpose is to create social change.
It argues against the top-down, hierarchal
relationships associated with male-dominated
knowledge by minimizing the social distance
between researcher and subject. Respondents often
participate in the research process.
It focuses on the position in society of research
subjects and the researcher.
The perspectives or standpoint of the subject and
researcher are central in data collection and
analysis.
No probability sampling
3. Standardized open-ended
interview
Validating
Themes Description
the
accuracy of
the Coding the data
information
Reading through all the data
Collecting
63 raw data
Then we engage in the coding
process that involves several steps:
Divide text Label Reduce Collapse
Initially read
into segments segments of Overlap and codes into
through data
of information information redundancy themes
with codes of codes
Open
Break down, compare, and categorize data
Axial
Make connections between categories
after open coding
Selective
Select the core category, relate it to other
categories and confirm and explain those
relationships
67
Methods of Evaluating Qualitative
Research
Developing standards of quality
Lincoln and Gubas classic work shed
light on how to assess truth in a
qualitative report
Offered four alternate tests of quality
that reflect the assumptions of the
qualitative paradigm:
Credibility
Dependability
Transferability
Confirmability
6-68
Lincoln and Gubas
naturalistic criteria
Aspect Scientific Term Naturalistic Term
Truth value Internal validity Credibility
Applicability External validity or Transferability
generalizability
Consistency Reliability Dependability
Neutrality Objectivity Confirmability
69
Alternate Tests of Quality
Credibility refers to accuracy
Description must be plausible and
recognized by participants
Enhanced by:
Prolonged time in the field repeatedly
observing and interacting with participants
Using different data sources, methods,
data type
Conducting member checks
Involving other investigators in the study
70
Alternate Tests of Quality
Dependability refers to the stability and
trackability of the changes in data over time
and conditions
71
Alternate Tests of Quality
Transferability refers to the
generalizability of the study findings to
other settings, populations, and
contexts
6-73
Qualitative research
One of the opportunities --- and
challenges -- posed by qualitative
approaches is to regard our fellow
human beings as people instead of
subjects, and to regard ourselves as
humans who conduct our research
among rather than on them.
Wolcott, H.F. (1990). Writing up qualitative research. Qualitative
Research Methods Series, Vol. 20. Newberry Park: Sage.
74
Criteria for Evaluating
Qualitative Research
Is the research significant? Is there new or
unique information that is added to the work
of others?
Are the methods appropriate for the question?
Are informants appropriate to inform study
questions?
Was data collection systematic? Adequate?
Is reference made to accepted procedures for
analysis?
Was a systematic inductive approach used?
75
Criteria for Evaluating
Qualitative Research
(continued)
Is there adequate discussion of how the
themes, concepts and categories were
derived from the data?
Are the researchers conceptualizations
true to the data? Are findings presented
within a context? Is the reader able to
understand the essence of the experience
from the report of findings?
Is the credibility of the findings addressed?
Do the conclusions reflect study findings?
76
Advantages and Limitations of
Qualitative research
Focus on the whole of the human experience and
the meanings ascribed to them by participants
They provide the researcher with deep insights that
would not be possible using quantitative methods
The major strength of qualitative work is the
validity of the data it produces
Participants true reality is likely to be reflected
Major limitation is its perceived lack of objectivity
and generalizability
Researchers become the research tools and may
lack objectivity
6-77
References for Qualitative Research
Berg, B.L. (2008) Qualitative Research for the Social
Sciences. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
David, M. and Sutton, C. (2004) Social Research the
Basics. London: Sage, Ch 4.
Flick, U. (2009) An Introduction to Qualitative
Research. London: Sage.
Krueger, R.A. (1988) Focus groups: A practical guide for applied
research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, Inc.
Mason, J. (2002) Qualitative Researching. London:
Sage.
Merriam, S.B. (2009) Qualitative Research: A Guide to
Design and Implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-
Bass.
Silverman, D. (2009) Doing Qualitative Research. 78
References
Bernard, H.R. (2000). Social Research
Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative
approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and
Research Design: Choosing Among Five
Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Munhall, P.L. (2001). Nursing Research: A
Qualitative Perspective, 3rd Edition.
Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett
Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative Research &
Evaluation Methods, 3rd Edition. Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage