Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CLASIFICACIN
DRENAJE
INTRODUCCIN
Relleno
Cuerpo
Base o cimentacin
Pie de base
Taln de base
Llave
Inclinacin de muro
Keys
(a)
Approach siab
Approach
fill
Optional
(b) (e) piles
(f)
Stretcher Headers
Face of wall
Counterforts
Note : Cells to be
filled with soil
(c) (d)
Figure 12-1 Types of retaining walls. (a) gravity walls of stone masonry, brick or plain concrete. Weight provides
overturning and sliding stability; (b) cantilever wall; (c) counterfort, or buttressed wall. If backfill covers
counterforts, the wall is termed a counterfort; (d) crib wall; (e) semigravity wall (small amount of steel reinforcement
Cut
Cut
Fill
Fill
(a)
Cut
Fill
(b)
Water
Water
(e)
(c)l
(d)
High water
level
(f) (g)
Figure 3.22 Common use of retaining wall : (a) Hill side roads
(b) Elevated and depressed roads, (c) Load scaping
(d) Canals and locks (e) Erosin protection (f) Flood
walls
Backfill
Front
face
Backface
Batter
Key between successive
concrete pours for high
walls
Key
Stem
Toe
Heel
Muros Cantilever
Muros de Gravedad
200 mm minimum
(300 mm preferable)
Minimum batter
1
H
48
B/3
H/12 to H/10
48 min
H
to 12
14
H H
H
-0 .6
0.3
B=
0.4
0 2
.7 0
H
0
m
m
m
i
n
i
Figure 12-4 Tentative design dimensions for a counterfort retaining wall.
m
u
Depth of base should be adequate for frost and below soils
m
which undergo volume change. This wall may not be economical
unless H 6 to 7 m.
0.30 m to H/12
Minimum
batter
Slope
change
1:48 to reduce
concrete
H
D to D
H/8 to H/6
D
May be 0.5 to 0.7 H
s
loped
(
a
)
Figure 12-5 (a)Tentative dimensions for a gravity retaining wall; (b)
broken-back retaining wall.
R
H
R
H
Figure 12-6 Pressure diagram for very rigid retaining walls. If some
o
W
s
Pa =
H2 Ka
Ph P
v
be removed Ph = Pa cos
H
e
2
Fr
P
Figure 12-7 Forces involved in the sliding stability of a retaining
wall. v
P
Vertical stem steel
P
L
Friction and
(a)
cohesion This may happen
2
(b)
Pp = Hp Kp
Possible passive
soil failure
b located here
Pp a
Heel
key
Figure 12-8 Stability against sliding using a base key . (a) Base key near
stem so that stem steel
Possible may
slip along this be run into the key; but (b) the
inclined plane
sliding surface(c)may develop as shown here where little aid is
gained from using the key; (c) heel key which presents two
possible modes of failure (passive and slip along the
plane).
a, meters
0.61
1.22
1.83
400 read horizontally to b = 2.10 37.2
Example: = 30 ka = 0.33
H2ka, m2
)
0 '( 5
m
m=1 1 3.
0
= '( )
m=2 b 0 m
3000 1 4 27.9
= 2.
4
b ( )
8' 4m
= .4
b (2
= 8'
b )
83m )
(1. m
= 6 ' ( 1. 83
b =6 ' )
b . 2 2m
1
= 4' (
b
200 18.6
2 2 m)
( 1 .
4'
b=
1000 9.3 m
Fig. 3.29 Chart for determining approximate dimension Ha and b for the base
slab,
so that the resultant will fall inside the middle third (Bowles,
12
Q= W
10 p
pp o
B
Depthof key = B t an e
8 .
. Q/p = 2 and e = 18.5
RATIO Q/P
Example: B = 3 m; Q = 2
Also check Pp which may yield a
= 7.25 ton; Q = 20
=1
0
.
=1
5
= Depth of key 3.75 tan 18.5 = 1.25
6 20
= m
25
=3
0
be
lower SF and = 35critical.
=4
0
4
Fig. 3.34 Chart to find the depth of heel key for a sliding factor of safety
of
0
1.5.1Curves
5 not valid
10 for15= 0 (Bowles,
20 1968) 30
25
ANGLE OF HEEL KEY
FUERZAS EN EL MURO DE CONTENCIN
Ws v a
= angle of wall friction W P =P
c
sin Pv = Pa sin (90- + )
P
Ph = Pa cos (90- + ) P =P Pa
Wc h a
cos a
If small
a
P 90 -
neglect
V = W c + Pv V = W c + W s + Pv
Figure 12-9 Forces
(a)
on a gravity wall (a) Coulomb
b)
analysis; (b) Rankine
analysis
Ws
Wc Wc
H Pa Pa
Hw
H 3 Pa cos
Hw
qheel
3
M
it is in q
qtoe (b)
V
M Q M
1 (a)
M q1= average height of
Df
soil x + D ( )
q qt q Df qs b qh
c S f
x q = qh +D sx - q1
q = qt x- sx - q1 Heel: Q qdx
=
o
o
(b)
M= Qdx
M= Qdx
Figure 12-11 Cantilever retaining wall. (a) Stem shear and moments; (b) toe and
heel shears and moments.
Treat the toe as a cantilever H
beam loaded with the indicated
pressure diagram. (Same
solution as for the cantilever
retaining wall).
ip
it str
un q= H
ip
it s tr
un
l s
tri Equivalent beam
p
Kl l l l
l2
cantilever moment equal q
If it is desired that the Use Counterforts
for top strips of stem with an average q on
H/2
q = HKa
H/4
H
H/4
H/4
H/4
H/4
q/2 q/2 q
q q/2 q/2
for
Usepositive moment
this pressure diagram negative
Use moment
this diagram for
computations computations
(a)
l l l l
l
0
.
Unit 4
1
l M=
M= M= M=
(b)
In this zone
M 0
Assum
eM=
const.
H/2
H
H
M
+M = 4
-M = 0.03 qHl
H/4
V = 0.2 qH
q = HKa
(a)
+M
Ste
Counterfort m Counterfort
-
M
l/3 l/3
l/3
(
b)
Ws
1
Pa = 2 H2 Ka
H
H/3
6 (3-4-5-6)
Pb = area of pressure diagram
3
c 4
D Mt
b
5
qf
Pb sin
Figure 12-15 Forces
on the heel slab of a counterfort wall as proposed by
Huntington (1957)
approximated as a uniform pressure w"
P'b sin
b w" = W'/b
q
CAPACIDAD PORTANTE ADMISIBLE
qult = cNc dc ic + q Nq dq iq + 1 BN d i
2
i = factor de inclinacin V = fuerza vertical
q = V Vec
(e L/6)
A I
qa
ASENTAMIENTOS
W backfill
Excessive toe
settlement
(a)
Underlying strata of compresible material as
clay or peat
(b)
Figure 12-16 Settlement failures. (a) Excessive forward tilt due to a high toe
pressure; (b) excesive settlement and tilt due to backfill. The
latter is a common potential problem at bridge abutments
caused by the approach fill
h
Soft material with
low shear strength
Figure 12-17 Soil shear failure. May be analyzed by the Swedish-circle method. A
shallow failure occurs when base soil fails. A deep failure
occurs if the poor soil stratum is underlying a better soil as in the
figure.
DISEO DE MUROS DE GRAVEDAD Y SEMIGRAVEDAD
FSs
Pc
b b'
Compression
Tension (Possible)
B' On olny Ph
V = horizontal plane
1.1 f ' as bb'
12 B'
the shear stress (V) ls:
e'
c
c
fc = 1 0.45 f =e
t 1 1.6 f
Tension c'
Compression
f c' c'
Q 6e
Q 6e
12 B' B'
Figure 12-18 Design of a gravity
retaining
wall with critical points
indicated. 12 B'
B'
Juntas de Construccin
Juntas de Contraccin
Juntas de Expansin
Keys used to tie
two pours together
or to increase
shear between
base and stem
No key use:
surface base and
is cleaned
roughened.
provides Steel
a dded shear
joint
Expansion so crack formation
Contraction is controlled
joints: Weakened planes
0.411 0.411
Lloraderos
Drenes longitudinales
Relleno granular
Backfill with free draining soil
Weepholes should be
10 cm or larger to avoid
plugging Note that the
discharge is on to the
toe where the
pressure soil
is largest. Drain pipe covered with Cut hole in
granular material.
counterfort if required.
2
T = Pww sen
M= P L
ww w
2
Beams
Seat
w
L
l
al
w
g
in
W
P
ww
Joint
Abutment
Backfill
Figure 12-21 Brigde abutment and wing-wall earth pressure and methods of
construction. Monolithic
Pab
DISEO DE UN MURO CON CONTRAFUERTES
Wall
Qc
Counterfort
y
c.g.s.
qh
arm
Tension
adequate cover.
C
L CL /// fixed
S X,Y rot = 0
Y-rotations = 0
Counterfort
W
all
X
T
y
Figure 12-23 Tipycal layout for using mat program p
to solve a plate fixed on
three edges. Note use of closer grid ispacing at edges to better
develop plate curvature. c
a
l
g
r
i
Counterfort
A Counterfort
main
reinforcing
Face wall B Horizontal
B const. Face of
Joint for high wall
face of wall U-ties.
Counterfort
Main reinforcing in
wall
Dowls.
CALCULO DEESTATICO
EMPUJE Empuje Total (Est.
DISEO DISEO SISMICO Calc.+ Sism.)
MONONOBE-
OKABE PRAKASH-
SARAN
RANKINE COULOMB CULMANN
Dimensionamiento de Pantalla
Peralte minimo por corte
Clculo de Fuerzas
y
Aumenta longitud
Momentos
Estabilizantes
de la base
FSDFSD 1.5 / Eh
= Sumh
NO
FSV = Mi/Me
NO
FIG. 1 DIAGRAMA DE
FSDFLUJO-
1.5 PROGRAMA CANT-UNI
1 2 3
Esfuerzos en la base:
Smax, Smin
qa Smax
NO
Diseo de la pantalla
Refuerzo Principal y secun- Aumenta altura de la
dario grfico para determinar zapata
Altura de corte de fierro
NO
Vma
x > Vact
N
O
SI Variar
de Presin
P
rdida
n taln
0.25 m
w = 2 Ton / m2
1 = 32
H1 = 2.0 m. c1 = 0
2 = 28
H2 = 2.5 m. 1 = 1.70 T / m3
c2= 1 T / m
6.0 m 2
= 1.80 T / m3
1.5 m 2
= 20
2
H3 = 1.5 m. cb = 2.5 T /
3.90 m
m2
0.50 2 = 1.9 T / m3
13 m
= 20
2
cb = 2.5 T / m2
2 = 1.9 T / m3
Figura 2
5.0 m
0.20 m
= 10