Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TESTING TECHNOLOGIES
ADDITIONAL NEG
POS TESTS
HIV Testing Strategy
G
IN
HIV1/2
N
NEG
EE
SCREEN
R
SC
REACTIVE
POS HIV-1 NEG
WB
L
TA
EN
NEG
ADDITIONAL
EM
POS
L
TESTS
PP
SU
POINT OF REPORTING
The Use of Screening Assays
Define samples as negative for a
given analyte
Enable high throughput
Why Follow a Strategy?
The Importance of Maintaining a
Strategy
Consistency of laboratory records
Consistency of results
Clarity of results to doctors
Maintaining data base to assess
performances
Avoiding common false reactivity
Avoiding technical errors
Reducing costs
WHO Recommended Strategies
Diagnosis
Surveillance
Window period
IgM. IgG
Different Test for HIV
DIRECT
INDIRECT
PRE-TEST COUNSELING,
INFORMED CONSENT,
CONFIDENTIALITY.
Challenges of HIV Testing
Sensitivity - Early diagnostic ( window period)
Detection of antibodies
Screening tests
Enzyme immunosorbent assays (EIAs)
Simple/rapid immuno-diagnostics assays
Results
Negative Reaction has color change
Positive Reaction no color change
IgG-Capture EIA
Serum (1/100)
Goat-anti-Human-IgG
Capture Antibody Biotin-Labeled Ag
Strepavidin-
Substrate Peroxidase
Reason for EIA
This test supplied as kit
Easy to Perform
Sensitive
Specific
Cost effective
Reason for EIA
This test supplied as kit
Easy to Perform
Sensitive
Specific
Cost effective
Components of Commercially Available EIA
Kits
SolidPhase Support
Antigens bound to polystyrene microtiter plates
(passive absorption)
Blocking is necessary to reduce nonspecific
binding (test accuracy)
96 microwell format
Antigens
The use of cloned antigens has reduced non-
specific binding
Antibodies
Monoclonals of high titer, affinity and avidity
Components of Commercially Available EIA
Kits
Conjugates
Ab conjugated with enzyme
(without effecting binding site)
Enzyme
HRP (horseradish peroxidase)
Substrate (chromogenic)
Colorless chromogen reacts with enzyme ( color)
Stop Solution
Typically an acid, stabilizes the color for a limited
time
Sources of Error for HIV EIA Tests
Documented Sources of False Negative
Results
Operator Error
Inaccurate pipetting
Equipment :
2- Microplate Washers
Daily
Prime the washer with wash solution before running sample plates
Set the washer to wash the recommended number of times (with correct
volume)
Check for accurate dispensing and complete aspiration in each plate well,
if not clean the washer head
Listen for changes in the sound the washer makes, this can indicate a
vacuum leak
Monthly
Run a 10% solution of ethanol through the
washer to disinfect. This can also be done if
the washer exhibits signs of contamination
(high background).
Thoroughly rinse the washer after alcohol is
used.
Equipment : Micro-plate
Reader
Daily
Each time a reader is turned on it runs a self
test, it will then report any errors.
Weekly
Run a control plate weekly. Variations in
positive or negative specimens could be a
sign of a bad diode or a spill on a diode.
Source of False Positive Results
MULTIPLE PREGNANCY
MULTIPLE TRANSFUSION
CHRONIC HEPATITIS,
CHRONIC ALCOHOLIC
HBV VACCINATION
ANTIBODY TO POLYSTERENE
Cross contamination
Can be caused by:
Transport conditions
Storage conditions
Age of sample
Validation and Interpretation of Results
Strips are
The membrane is incubated with
cut into strips patient serum
and antihuman
IgG conjugated
with an enzyme
(and chromagen)
HIV Western Blot Banding Pattern
env gp160
gp120
gp 41
gag p55
p18
p24
pol p65
p51
p31
Interpretation of Results
(General Consensus)
*
When should WB be used?
HOWEVER:
Specificity is less than that of EIA
A significant number of indeterminate blots are seen
in low risk populations
Advantages
Specific interaction of antibody and antigen can be
directly visualized.
Disadvantages
Technically demanding
Expensive
Subject to interpretation
Presence or absence of bands
Intensity of those bands