RPMS, what we got?

Boons/advantages/upsides of RPM
Problems/difficulties/hitches encountered
In the scale of 1 -5 (where 5 is the highest) what grade will you give
on how RPMS is carried out
Thing that need to improve as regards its implementation
 CATEGORY DEFINITION
Effectiveness/Quality The extent to which actual performance compares with targeted performance.

The degree to which objectives are achieved and the extent to which targeted
problems are solved.
In management, effectiveness relates to getting the right things done
Efficiency The extent to which time or resources is used for the intended task or purpose.
Measures whether targets are accomplished with a minimum amount or
quantity of waste, expense, or unnecessary effort

In management, efficiency relates to doing the things right

Timeliness Measures whether the deliverable was done on time based on requirements
of the rules and regulation, and/or client/stakeholders

Time-related performance indicators evaluates such things as project

completion, deadlines, time management skills and other time-sensitive
expectation
 Some Performances are only rated
on quality and efficiency, some on
quality and timeliness, and others on
efficiency only.

You need not use all three (3) categories

 Objective
By Aug 31, all (100%)
school
head/administrators of
DepEd, Non-DepEd, elem,
junior & senior high school
are provided technical
assistance on web-based
education information
system (EBEIS/LIS) to
generate accurate,
complete, reliable, timely
and relevant data
Performance Indicator
Quality Efficiency Timeliness
5 Outputs generated 5 100% of 5 On or before
are accurate, SH/Admin of
complete, reliable,
15
timely and relevant DepEd, Non- 4 1 3 after Aug
data DepEd, Elem, JHS, 15
4 Output generated SHS are provided 3 4 - 6 after Aug
and absence of 1 technical assistant. 15
3 Output generated 4 95% - 99%.....
and absence of 2
2 7 10 after
2 Output generated 3 90% - 94%.... Aug 15
and absence of 3 2 85% - 89%.... 1 11 more days
1 Output generated 1 84% and after Aug 15
and absence of 4 below
 Objective Performance Indicator
Quality Efficiency Timeliness
By the end of the rating
period, be able to assess 5 Assessment and 5 Conducted 4 5 assessment
and evaluate quarterly the evaluation done assessment and and evaluation
objectively, completely, evaluation by the
Supply Officer on the done within 1
systematically, stress end of the rating
implementation of free and with written week after the end
procurement in period.
report and of the quarter
4 3 assessment
accordance with the laws recommendations 4 .done 2
4 Output generated and evaluation
& guidelines to ensure weeks.
and absence of 1 3 2 assessment
prompt delivery of and evaluation 3 done 3
3 Output generated
services and absence of 2 21 weeks..
2 Output generated assessment 2 ..done 4
and absence of 3 1 no assessment weeks..
1 Output generated and evaluation was 1 - after one
and absence of 4 conducted.. month
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
School/Office: Date of Review:
Rating Period:
KEY RESULTS WT. PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
MFO OBJECTIVES TIME LINE KRA/OBJ.
RATING SCORE
AREAS Q E T Q E T AVE.

*To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned. OVERALL RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHMENT

Rater Ratee Approving Authority

 OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (OPCRF)
Name of Employee: Name of Rater:
Position: Position:
School/Office: Date of review:
Rating Period:
KEY RESULTS WT. PER PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS
MFO OBJECTIVES TIME LINE KRA/OBJ
RATING SCORE
AREAS Q E T Q E T AVE.

OVERALL RATING FOR

ACCOMPLISHMENT

Rater Ratee Approving Authority