Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Alternate Name:
Bar Chart
2
Bar Graph Example
In June 2005, the US Dept of Transportation
reported the following data by observing 1700
motorcyclists nationwide at randomly selected
roadway location:
Proper Helmet 731
Insufficient Helmet 153
No Helmet 816
Total 1,700
3
Helmets Used by Motorcyclists
Vertical
Source: US Dept of Transportation
Bar 900
Graph 816
800
Example 731
700
600
Number of Motorcyclists
500
400
300
200 153
100
0
Proper Helmet Insufficient Helmet No Helmet
4
Helmet Type
x-axis & y-axis Variables
816
variable is normally a 800
731
600
Is it discrete or
Number of Motorcyclists
500
continuous? 400
300
On a vertical bar 200 153
variable is normally 0
Proper Helmet Insufficient Helmet No Helmet
Categorical Variable 5
Type of Variables on the
Previous Motorcycle Bar Graph
x-axis?
Categorical Variable.
Name the categories
Proper, Insufficient, None
y-axis
Discrete Quantitative Variable
What are the units?
Helmets
6
Making a Bar Graph Look Better
What would make this bar graph look better?
If we ranked the numbers by either increasing or
decreasing value, the appearance would be less
jagged, making a Pareto Chart.
What is a Pareto Chart?
A bar graph in which the bars are ordered
according to value, in either increasing or
decreasing order.
Why Pareto Charts? Graph is named for Vilfredo
Pareto, an Italian mathematician & economist.
1848-1923.
7
Vertical Bar Graph as Pareto Chart
Helmets Used by Motorcyclists
Source: US Dept of Transportation
900
816
800 751
700
Number of Motorcyclists
600
500
400
300
200 153
100
0
Insufficient Helmet Proper Helmet No Helmet
Helmet Type 8
Education & Annual Income Survey
71.0
70
62.1
60
50
48.6
$,000/yr
40
34.3
30
20 16.1
10
9th Grade
High Associate Bachelor Master's Doctoral
Highest Ed Level School Gr Degree Degree Degree Degree 10
Retail Sales
Sales per Square Foot in $
Store $/Ft
Dillard's 147
Kohl's 279
Marshall Field's 220
Federated 192
Nordstrom 357
Sears 250
Target 410 11
Pareto Chart of Sales At Retail Outlets
Sales by Store in $/Sq Ft
Source: Wall Street Journal
450
410
400
357
350
300 279
250
250
Sales per Sq Foot
220
200
192
147
150
100
50
0
Retailer
Dillard's Federated Marshall Sears Kohls Nordstrom Target
Field's 12
Sales by Store in $/Ft
Non Pareto Source: Wall Street Journal
Version of 450
410
Sales 400
357
350
Sales per Sq Foot
300 279
250
250
220
200 192
147
150
100
50
0
Dillard's Kohl's Marshall Federated Nordstrom Sears Target
Field's 13
Retailer
Bar Graphs: VERY FLEXIBLE FORMAT
Advantage over Pie Charts
Bar Graphs are easier to make & to read
than pie charts.
How are they similar to Pie Charts?
Both pie charts & bar graphs can display the
distribution of a categorical variable
How are they different from Pie Charts?
A bar graph can also compare any set of
quantities measured in the same units.
14
Psychic Phenomena
15
Pareto Chart of Psychic Phenomena
400
385
Number of People
300
283
200
152
100
0
Psychic Healing ESP Ghosts Astrology Channeling
Psychic Phenomena
16
In Class Survey:
Do you believe in Supernatural Phenomena?
Yes
No
No Opinion
Totals
17
In Class Survey:
Do you believe in Supernatural Phenomena?
Yes
No
No Opinion
Totals
18
In Class Survey Results from 2009:
Do you believe in Supernatural Phenomena?
19
In Class Survey Results from 2009
3-Level Comparative Bar Graph
Does Intro Stat Believe in Psychic Phenomena? Yes
25 No
Source: In Class Survey 22
No Opinion
20 19
18
17
14
Number of Students
15
11
10 9 9
8
5
1 1
0
0
Class Per Two Per Three Per Four Per Five
20
In Class Survey Results from 2009: Simple Bar
Graph
47
50
40
30
20
11
10
0
Yes No No Opinion
Opinion
21
In Class Survey Results from 2009: Pie Chart
Does Intro Stat Believe in Psychic Phenomena?
No Opinion
8.5%
No Yes
36.4% 55.0%
22
Rainfall In Hawaii
4.0
3.6
3.5
3.2
3.0
3.0
Inches
2.5
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.5 1.4
1.0
1.0 0.8
0.6 0.7
0.5 0.3
0.0
Month Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
24
Bar Graph Characteristics
1. Data can be quantitative or categorical
2. Bars can be vertical or horizontal
3. The x-axis represents the category
displayed
4. The y-axis represents the quantitative
values of the variable being displayed
5. Bars are of uniform width and uniformly
spaced
25
Bar Graph Characteristics
6. A consistent measurement scale is used
for each vertical bar
7. Height of bars represent the values of
the variable displayed, the frequency of
occurrence or percentage of occurrence
8. The graph is well-annotated with title,
labels for each bar, vertical scale,
horizontal categories, source
26
Changing Scale The Squiggle
What is a squiggle?
At least a 2-angle line on a bar graph axis that abbreviates a scale.
When do you use a squiggle?
Use a squiggle on the changed axis whenever you change scale in a bar graph.
or
27
Pie to Bar: Spending On NY Lottery
Instant Games
Lotto 42.7%
23.1%
28
Spending On NY Lottery
$ %
Type of Game in bn nrst 0.1 nrst 0.1
Instant Games
3-Digit Games
4-Digit Games
Lotto
Other Games
Totals
29
Spending On NY Lottery
$ %
Type of Game in bn nrst 0.1 nrst 0.1
Instant Games 16.4 42.7% 153.8
3-Digit Games 5.2 13.6% 49.1
4-Digit Games 2.8 7.2% 26.0
Lotto 8.9 23.1% 83.0
Other Games 5.1 13.4% 48.1
Totals 38.4 100.0% 360.0
30
NY State Lottery Sales in $bn
18.0
16.4 Source: Statistical Abstract of US
16.0
14.0
12.0
10.0
8.9
Sales in $bn
8.0
4.0
2.8
2.0
0.0
31
Turning a Pie Chart into a Bar Graph
What Job Do Students Want After College?
Grad School
18.0%
Private
Co/Business
36.1%
Own
Business
13.9%
State/Local Federal
Gov't Government
18.9% 13.1%
Job Type # students % of Total nrst 0.1
Fed Gov't 16 13.1% 47.2
Private Co/Bus 44 36.1% 129.8
Grad School 22 18.0% 64.9
Own Business 17 13.9% 50.2
State/Local Gov't 23 18.9% 67.9
Total 122 100.0% 360.0
34
Turning a Pie Chart into a Bar Graph
50
35
Number of Students
30
25 23 22
20
16 17
15
10
0
Private Co/Business Federal Government State/Local Gov't Own Business Grad School
35
Would The Bar Graph Make a Good Pie
Chart?
Only when Bar Graphs represent parts of
a whole, can it be made into a Pie Chart.
If the answer is NO, you could write:
No, because these values are comparative
data only.
No, because these values DO NOT represent
parts of the whole.
If the answer is YES, you could write:
Yes, because these values represent parts of
the whole.
36
Bar Graph & Pie Chart Relationship Summary
Acquaintances
43.9%
Pet Stores
9.4%
Breeders
31.9%
Source: USA Today Sample Size: 1994 Pet Owners
38
Turning a Pie Chart into a Bar Graph
Sourcing a New Pet
%
# of People nrst 0.1% nrst 0.1
Acquaintances
Breeders
Pet Stores
Animal Shelters
Totals
39
Turning a Pie Chart into a Bar Graph
# of People %
nrst 0.1% nrst 0.1
Acquaintances 876 43.9% 158.2
Breeders 636 31.9% 114.8
Pet Stores 188 9.4% 33.9
Animal Shelters 294 14.7% 53.1
Totals 1994 100.0% 360
40
Turning a Pie Chart into a Bar Graph
Where US Pet Owners Get Their Pets
in July 2008
1000
900 876
800
Number of People
700
636
600
500
400
294
300
188
200
100
Time
Warner
19.2%
AT&T
29.4%
Source: Gartner Sample Size: 45.9m subscribers
42
Turning a Pie Chart into a Bar Graph
43
Turning a Pie Chart into a Bar Graph
44
Turning a Pie Chart into a Bar Graph
18
Top Internet Broadband Players # of Subscribers 2009
16 15.3
Source: Gartner
14 13.5
12
Subscribers in Millions
10
8.8
8.3
8
0
Company Comcast AT&T Time Warner Verizon 45
Deciding Which Graph is Better
remains, 120
100
60
This is a matter of
opinion Supply the remainder of the data
labels
47
Examining a Bar Chart for Meaning
Whats the question?
Whats the title?
Whats the population?
Whats the sample?
How many variables? 70000
11.4%
12.0%
61,786
What are they? 60000 57,936
10.3% 10.3%
10.0%
8.0%
Good pie chart? 40000
7.7%
6.6%
4.0%
20000
2.0%
10000
0 0.0%
Washington, DC Seattle, WA New York, NY Portland, OR Austin, TX
48
Turning a Pie Chart into a Bar Graph
How Satisfied are You with US Public Schools?
Source: YouGov for Economist Sample Size: 2546 Americans
Very Satisfied
3.7%
Somewhat
Somewhat
Dissatisfied
31.8% Satisfied
27.2%
Very
Dissatisfied
37.3%
49
Turning a Pie Chart into a Bar Graph
Number of %
Level of Satisfaction Responses nrst 0.1 nrst 0.1
Very Satisfied
Somewhat Satisfied
Somewhat Dissatisfied
Very Dissatisfied
Total
50
Turning a Pie Chart into a Bar Graph
Number of %
Level of Satisfaction Responses nrst 0.1 nrst 0.1
Very Satisfied 94 3.7 13.3
Somewhat Satisfied 693 27.2 97.9
Somewhat Dissatisfied 950 37.3 134.3
Very Dissatisfied 810 31.8 114.5
Total 2546 100.0 360
51
Turning a Pie Chart into a Bar Graph
1000 950
How Satisfied Are You with US Public Schools?
900
Source: YouGov for the Economist 810
800
Number of Responses
693
700
600
500
400
300
200
94
100
0
Very Satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Somewhat Very Dissatisfied
Dissatisfied
52
Turning Pie Charts to Bar Graphs
Neither
Education
4.7%
18.4%
Equally
Health
Serious
Care
55.3%
21.6%
Source: YouGov for Economist Sample Size: 2546 Americans
53
Turning Pie Charts to Bar Graphs
Number of %
Issue Responses nrst 0.1 nrst 0.1
Education
Health Care
Equally Serious
Neither
Total
54
Turning Pie Charts to Bar Graphs
Number of %
Issue Responses nrst 0.1 nrst 0.1
Education 468 18.4 66.2
Health Care 550 21.6 77.8
Equally Serious 1408 55.3 199.1
Neither 120 4.7 16.9
Total 2546 100.0 360
55
Turning Pie Charts to Bar Graphs
What is the most serious problem facing America?
1600
Source: YouGov for the Economist
1400 1408
1200
Number of Responses
1000
800
600
550
468
400
200 120
0
Equally Serious Health Care Education Neither
Issue
56
Turning Pie Charts to Bar Graphs
Marital Status of Americans Ages 18 & Over
Divorced
8.8% Single
Widowed 22.6%
7.5%
Married
57
61.1%
Turning Pie Charts to Bar Graphs
Marital Status %
(millions of people) nrst 0.1 nrst 0.1
Single
Married
Widowed
Divorced
Total
58
Turning Pie Charts to Bar Graphs
Marital Status Count %
(millions of people) nrst 0.1 nrst 0.1
59
Turning Pie Charts to Usual Bar Graphs
150
Marital Status of Americans Ages 18 & Over
125
113.3
Number of Adults in Millions
100
75
50 41.8
25 16.3
13.9
0
Single Married Widowed Divorced
Marital Status
60
Turning Pie Charts to Pareto Bar Graphs
150
Marital Status of Americans Ages 18 & Over
125
113.3
Number of Adults in Millions
100
75
50 41.8
25 16.3 13.9
0
Married Single Divorced Widowed
Marital Status
61
Steps in Bar Chart Construction
62
Steps in Bar Chart Construction
65
Path After Graduation for Ithaca
High School Graduates in 1980
350 320 Source: Ithaca High School
300
250
Number of Graduates
200
150
98
100
45
50
18
0
Continuing Employed Military Other
Eduation
Chosen Path
66
Chosen Path
Pareto Chart of Path After Graduation
250
Number of Graduates
200
150
98
100
45
50
18
0
67
Kids Borrowing Money (Replace)
68
Credit Card Debt by Grade Level in 2001
5,000
4,000
Average Credit Card Debt in $
3,500
3,262
3,000
2,705
2,500
2,000 1,825
1,533
1,500
1,000
500 350
Grade 0
Level High School College College College College 1st Yr after
Senior Freshman Sophomore Junior Senior Graduation
69
Mountains to Climb
70
29,500
World's Highest Mountains
28,500
28,250
28,028
Height in Feet
28,000 27,890
27,790
27,500
27,000
26,810 26,760 26,750
26,500
26,000
25,500
t ir a l al al al al al
be m ep ep ep ep ep ep
Ti sh N N N N
st
,
Ka ,N , u, i,
N
u, ,
e , a
ts
e al gir sl yu
e r
K2 ng ho k a a O
Ev j u
L a ul an ho
h en M ha M C
nc D 71
Ka
Quiz #103 Bar Charts
Hints:
You need:
Complete the Vocabulary
Pencil, Eraser Then do the front page
Calculator
Graph Paper (for 2 Place your HW in the HW
graphs: one sheet okay) box
No bags on desk
Clear all lists in Calculator
72