KEPENTINGAN

SUMBER LISAN
KPD AHLI
SEJARAH
 Wawancara SL adalah berharga krn ia
merupakan sumber pengetahuan
baru(sumber sejarah)
Sebagai bahan untuk memberi interpretif
terhadap peristiwa sejarah yang telah
ditulis.
Mempelbagaikan perspektif sej
Memperkaya hasil/sumber sejarah
( enriched the work of a generation of
social historians)
 Membekalkan maklumat ttg kehidupan
seharian(rutin) ketika masyarakat itu dikaji.
Membantu ahli sej membaca pemikiran
masyarakat pd masa kajian.(lebih2 lg
masy gol bawahan yang dianggap tidak
penting dalam CATATAN sej)
 Siri-siri temuramah akan membuka
pandangan baru tentang peritiwa masa
lalu.
mengetahui peristiwa di sebalik peristiwa
(the story underneath the story)
Menjelaskan motif yang pelbagai dalam
menerbitkan sesuatu perisitwa
sejarah(biasanya motif ini tidak dicatat
dalam rekod umum- atas kapasiti SULIT).
 Mencari perkaitan individu tertentu dengan
individu tertentu dlm peristiwa sejarah.
Contoh apa kaitan antara Datuk Onn dgn
Tunku Abdul Rahman( kenapa UMNO
tiba-tiba berubah kepimpinan, apakah
rahsia disebalik perubahan tersebut dsb)
Sesetengah org mempunyai pandangan
sendiri ttg masa lepas walaupun perisiwa
itu sama-sama mereka lalui.
 most people engage with the past in
deeply personal ways

barrier separating the analytic work of the

professional historian from vernacular
efforts at history-making
INTERPRETASI SL:
are not an unproblematic source.
historians must exercise critical judgment
when using interviews
The first step in assessing an interview
consider the reliability of the narrator
verifiability of the account
The narrator's relationship to the events
under discussion
the personal stake in presenting a
particular version of events
 the physical and mental state at the time
of the events under discussion
overall attention and care the narrator
brings to the interview
internal consistency of the account itself all
figure into the narrator's reliability as a
source
The veracity of what is said in an interview
can be gauged by comparing it both with
other interviews on the same subject and
with related documentary evidence
 If the interview jibes with other evidence, if
it builds upon or supplements this
evidence in a logical and meaningful way,
one can assume a certain level of veracity
in the account.
If, however, it conflicts with other evidence
or is incompatible with it, the historian
needs to account for the disparities:
Were different interviewees differently situated in
relationship to the events under discussion?
 Might they have different agendas, leading them to tell
different versions of the same story?
Might the written sources be biased or limited in a
particular way?
SIAPAKAH INTERVIEWER?
the interviewer's questions provide the
intellectual framework for the interview and
give it direction and shape
Good interviewers listen carefully and
attempt to more closely align their
questions with what the narrator thinks is
important.
SIAPAKAH INTERVIEWEER?
Yet the questions asked are not the only
influence an interviewer has upon what is
said in an interview.
interviewers have social identities that are
played out in the dynamic of the interview
deciding what they can appropriately say
to this person, what they must say, and
what they should not say
APAKAH YANG DICERITAKAN:
The topical range of oral history interviews
is enormous, including everything from the
most public of historical events to the most
intimate details of private life
The choice
Unsur2 emosi, bias, kecenderungan
KENAPA MEREKA BERCERITA:
The purposes of an interview
expressed and implied
Conscious
influence and shape the narrative itself
For a generation
away from party politics and public life
KENAPA MEREKA BERCERITA:
efforts to revive popular memory about a
subject precisely at that moment when it is
about to slip away