system of Checks and Balances? Political Parties in theory should weaken checks Constitution divides power, parties try to bring people together Why? 1. Only 2 parties dominate 2. There is a wide range of interests, not only from party to party, but within parties 3. Difficult to maintain control 1. Government is usually divided (i.e., the president is of one party and the Congress is controlled by the other) Changes in Voting Methods and the Checks and Balances 1. Senators are chosen by the people (no longer the state legislatures) 2. Representatives are also chosen by the people. 3. The president is elected by electors, chosen by the people (though not reflecting the popular vote) 4. In theory, 2 branches are chosen by the people How does this affect checks? In theory, it should weaken the checks since the people could control power in 2 of the three branches In reality, they are not weakened due to split ticket voting and the fact that the electoral college can elect a president that does not receive a majority of the popular vote. How has the growth of the federal bureaucracy affected the Checks? Numerous agencies have been given legislative, executive, and judicial powers For example: Congress formed the IRS and gave them authority to carry out the general will of Congress. They write tax code, enforce the tax code, and settle disputes over the tax code. They independently wield incredible power The Effect on the Checks? It has weakened the checks and balances by concentrating power in various bureaucracies How has technology affected the Checks? In the world today, all branches have access to instant information; Fax machines, the internet, satellite communication and observation, computers, and nuclear/chemical weapons There are 2 views 1. All branches can access information technology, actually strengthens checks since everyone has access to information 2. The President has taken advantage of staging press events to sway public opinion (e.g., landing on an aircraft carrier, surprise visit to Iraq). This weakens the power of the other two. How has the emergence of the U.S. as a world power affected the Checks? Areas of responsibility: U.S. is the leader of the free world U.S. now has national interests worldwide U.S. is the only remaining superpower in the world U.S. is expected to act in any crisis The Effect? These responsibilities need to be addressed in a strong and efficient manner, often quickly. This concentrates power (and action) in the executive branch (what some call an imperial presidency) This weakens the checks, giving the executive branch more power Federalist #51*** Madison says that experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions These multiple measures guard against tyranny: 1. Separation of power 2. Checks and balances 3. Federalism How did the Supreme Court get its power? Constitution has very few details regarding the powers of the court This changes with Marbury v. Madison. This case greatly strengthened the Supreme Court The Constitution did not have a lot of specifics about the judicial branch. This case gave the court great power over the other two branches in regards to Constitutionality of their actions How can the Constitution be changed? Formally: 2/3 of each house of Congress to propose and of the state legislatures to ratify, or 2/3 of the state legislatures call for a convention and of the state legislatures ratify This second method has never been used How can the Constitution be changed? Informally: Judicial interpretation (Supreme Court) Laws passed by Congress that elaborate on provisions of the Constitution Presidential practice (e.g., executive privilege) Custom and usage (e.g., political parties- which are not mentioned in the Constitution but are an important part of our government Federalism In Federalism There is a constitutional division of power between the national and state governments Each have powers in their own sphere independent of the other (layer-cake federalism) or shared powers (marble cake federalism) The Devolution Revolution Giving power back to the states Greater federal control over the years until Nixon Favored by Reagan, both Bushes, and the Republican Party in general Republican majority in Congress in 1994 Contract with America and devolution of power back to the states 1994 Congress Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 Restricted future unfunded mandates Use of block grants to replace categorical grants (more detail to come) 1996 welfare reform bill (Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act) that ended welfare as a federal entitlement (more details to come) Repeal of the 55 mph speed limit Supreme Court Actions that support devolution Struck down Gun Free School Zones Act in 1995; US v. Lopez Congress linked gun control laws to the interstate commerce clause of the Constitution (it was misapplied according to the courts) Supreme Court Actions that support devolution Struck down part of the Violence Against Women Act in US v. Morrison (2000) Court ruled that Congress overextended itself in applying the Interstate commerce clause to rape victims The previous ruling had allowed rape victims to sue their attackers in federal court Supreme Court ruled that it was the responsibility of the states to care for women victimized by violence Supreme Court Actions that support devolution Struck down the Religious Freedom Restoration Act in 1993 This act had restricted the power of the states to regulate religion The Supreme Court ruling allowed the states greater authority in regulating religion Supreme Court Actions that support devolution Struck down the Brady Act in 1997 This act had required local law enforcement agencies to do background checks on gun buyers Federalism and Federal Grants As the federal government has grown more powerful, it has used state and local governments to administer programs that are federally funded It has funded these programs through a series of federal grants Dollar amounts of these have consistently risen in the last several decades, though there has been a variation in grants as a percentage of federal expenditures Politics of American Federalism Great Society ( sweeping social program of LBJ to address poverty and racial injustice) Programs: Medicare, Medicaid, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Voting Rights Act of 1965, Civil Rights Act of 1968, Economic Opportunity Act of 1964 (anti-poverty program), the Job Corp, Head Start, VISTA (domestic Peace Corp), etc.
In Re Christopher Dwayne Larch Frederick Rocky Larch. Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians Frederick Wilfred Larch v. Ina Quinn Larch, 872 F.2d 66, 4th Cir. (1989)