Metodologia cercetrii tiinifice

Redactarea unei lucrri tiinifice

Corin Badiu, 2007

 Tipuri de lucrri tiinifice

Articol tiinific
Poster
Prezentare oral
Lucrare de diplom / master / doctorat
Grant de cercetare
Articole de educaie continu
Book review
 How to write Scientific text ?

Logical and in such way that other scientists

are able to repeat your work
Find out what is already known; find relevant
litterature
References
Figures, figure captions, tables
Language simple and clear sentences
 Why to write ?
Publication / Proposal

End Product of To obtain funding for

Scientific work you and/or your group
To get other people to be able to
interested in and to start/continue
know your work interesting and
To show your activity important research
 On Your topic

New scientific results -> Publish it

lab measurements, field campaigns,
development of new devices and new
methods, basic theories, modelling
How much material in one paper?
In principle all scientific work will result as
publication: if not look your supervisor/advisor
 Publication Chain

Abstract
Extended abstract
Real paper in International Journal
Nature/ Science paper

Thesis (M.Sc. / Ph.D)

Reports
 Writing process

Alone or in group
Ask comments as soon and as often as possible from
co-authors and other people
Example (on co-operation): A makes outlines and
main results and B writes details etc.
Alone A could make 1-2 papers per year together A
and B can make 4-5 papers per year
Remember: as writer you would like other people to
read it, take this into account when you write
 On Publications

Authorship
all authors must have scientific contribution
How many authors?
Review process
if you get somewhat postive comments it means that you are
able to publish the paper after some (even major) work;
Typically possible to negotiate
Nature, Science and PRL: you need to convince editors that
your topic is widely interested and significant
Letters to editros / covering letters
 Prewriting: Getting Started on Lab
Reports
As you begin your lab, you should take careful,
meticulous notes. These become the prewriting from
which you will write your report.
Labs require you to keep data logged in some
form of notebook, either paper or electronic.
Data must be accurate and precise.
Be sure to include all the information you need in
order to complete your report.
 It is important that you
Recording Data make sure that all the
information you are
recording is accurate and
precise.

Try placing your notes

into this format:
Materials used
Method followed
Results seen
Conclusions drawn
Some other ways of using technology for
taking notes:

Audio recording
Video recordings
Computer databases
Photographs
Whatever method of note taking you choose, make
sure the data you record is accurate, organized,
and clear enough for you to read later when you
can no longer depend on your memory.
 A System of Consistency is Vital

When you keep your own notes,

it is important that you record
the same type of data every time
you record something. For
example, if you record how tall a
plant has grown under different
light sources, be sure to record the
height at the same time of day
using the same system of
measurement. A devise like a
chart, can help keep your entries
consistent.
 Some scientific research may require a survey of
current research.

Include the following information

when recording information:
The information
Whether the information is a direct
quote or not
The source of the information and
date
The subject matter of the information
 Formatting and Organizing Lab
Reports

Lab Reports always answer these questions:

What was the purpose of
the lab?
What materials were used?
What was the procedure?
What were the results?
What are the conclusions?
A typical lab report includes the
following four parts.
 Report Structure: IMRaD+ C

Core sections of a scientific report can be

summarised as
IMRaD+ C
Introduction
Methods
Results
and
Discussion
+ Conclusion
 I. Introduction
ALWAYS tell the objectives/purpose of the
lab, what the lab is expected to prove
(hypothesis)
SOMETIMES gives the background of the
problem under research
SOMETIMES tells under whose authority the
lab was conducted
SOMETIMES is given a separate heading if
the lab report is long
 II. Materials and Procedure
(also called Experimental Section, Methodology, Method)

ALWAYS describes and/or lists materials or

instruments used
ALWAYS describes the procedure used, including
relevant calculations
ALWAYS uses chronological order (through time)
 III. Results and Discussion

ALWAYS presents test results with relevant

calculations; usually includes accompanying visuals
tables, graphs, etc.
ALWAYS discusses the results, explains why things
happened, tells what is significant
USUALLY uses chronological order for results seen
and cause-to-effect order for discussion of results.
 IV. Conclusions

ALWAYS includes a brief summary that tells

how the test results, findings, and analysis
meet the objectives established at the
beginning of the report.

SOMETIMES uses chronological order;

SOMETIMES uses priority order.
 Additional Sections of Lab Reports
May Include the Following:

Theory section Explains the

scientific theory behind the lab
Calculations section if the labs
used involve mathematical calculations
Recommendation section comes
after the conclusion and used if
necessary for the lab
Appendix section separate section
at the end of the report, that contains
tables and graphs whose complexity
and length disrupt the flow of the report
itself.
 Composing the Lab Report

A few more important things to remember

 Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

Scientific exploration explores physical

phenomena according to basic inductive and
deductive reasoning called the scientific
method. The scientific method is responsible
for the structure of the lab report.
 Results vs. Conclusions

Experiments require writers to observe results and to draw conclusions

from those observations. Observable results, however, are different from the
conclusions drawn.
A result is simply what happened; a conclusion goes beyond what
happened. A conclusion requires a scientist to draw an inference, to make a
point about the results.
For example, Paul Broca measured womens brains in the mid-1800s.
When he observed that they weighed an average of 181 grams less than a
mans brain, he wrongly concluded that smaller brains meant women were less
intelligent than men. His observation, the result of his measurements, was
correct. The brains did weigh less. But less weight doesnt lead to the
conclusion that women are not as smart. (Interesting note: What would he
have concluded if he had known Einsteins brain weighed nearly pound less
than the average mans brain?)
 Structure
Publication / Proposal

Abstract Summary
summary including main Introduction / background
results
Aims, objectives
Introduction
why and short litterature Methods
review Research Group
Materials and Methods Best publications
instruments, equations etc Significant results
Results Links to other research
your results lists
Discussion Scientific education, reseach
comparison with other training
results lists
Conclusions Schedule
focus on new things and Budget
wide connections
 Submission
Publications / Proposals
To which Journal
Look the format and other
instructions carefully
Citation index
more than 1
Nature around 20
JGR ~4
How much it costs ?
Do you expect to have
reasonable editors/revievers
Private foundations
National science foundation
(like Finnish Academy)
NMR, NoRFA
EU, ESF
Private Companies
TEKES type (You need
companies to find out
national funding)
Ministry of
 Anatomy of a Scientific Paper
Title: Descriptive, concise, and interesting
Abstract: Include all components of the manuscript
Body:
Introduction: State objectives, any questions, reason for writing
Materials and Methods: Provide details
Results: Stick to the facts, make sure it makes sense
Discussion: Draw conclusions from your data, compare to previous
studies
Conclusion: Studies implications, supported by results, and related to
objectives
References: Include retrievable sources, follow format
Tables: Do not imbed in text, follow guidelines, keep simple
Figures: Do not imbed in text, look professional
Figure Legends: Descriptive and concise
 Your paper.. how?
Do not dive in without a plan mind map to outline
Relevant background
Aims & Obj. to the problem Title &
abstract
Hypothesis
Introduction Materials and
Methods
Figures
Reading
My paper Analysis
References
Results
References Tables

Discussion Text statistics

 Abstract
Prcis writing
Informative, not descriptive
Some numbers, but not in
excess
Determines if paper will be
read
Is distributed freely in
databases
 Title

Max info in least words

<12 words
<100 characters
The title is a label
Should almost never contain
abbreviations
Question: easier to understand, more
impact
State results
 Figures

Do before writing
Redraw, redraw, prune clutter
Least non-data-ink
Max 4 lines, all solid
No caption
Reduce to 1 column in journal
- Reduced xerox copy to check
out
- Original should be <3x final
 Figures
Axes
- Minimize tick marks
- Dont number each tick
Lettering
- Uniform, lower case
- Minimize, avoid bold
- After reduction, 2-3 mm
high
Legend
- Gives message
 Tables

Single unit, understood without

text
Exceed 1 sheet: redraw
Avoid narrow/broad; rotate all 90o
No added vertical/horizontal lines
If small: move data to text
 Momentum
Fix a schedule
Monitor progress
Write by a biological clock
One page a week: torture
Skip trouble spots
Writers block: unacceptable
 Concentration

Need stretch of several hours

When time is short: prepare, revise
Avoid distractions: phone, beeper
Location
- Very boring area
- Nothing to distract
 First Draft
Write as quickly as possible
As if thinking out loud
Get everything down
Ignore spelling, grammar, style
Skip troublesome words
Correct and rewrite only when the whole text
is on paper
Do not split the manuscript among the co-
authors
Good Writing

Content, accuracy
Clarity
Precision
Logic
Order of
presentation
 Clarity

Clear
Exact
- Ambiguity, inconsistency
- Wooly words
Concise
- Least words
- Short words
- One word vs many
 Simplify
a majority of = most
at the present time = now
give rise to = cause
in some cases = sometimes
is defined as = is
it is believed that = I think
on the basis of = by
pooled together = pooled
subsequent to = after
with the result that = so that
 Use and Misuse of English

Tense
- Previously published work: present tense
- Your own work: past tense
Voice
- Active more precise and less wordy than
passive
- Name the agent, even I or we
Singulars and plurals
 Bad Writing

Words dont do justice to your ideas

If multiple mistakes in spelling and syntax,
reviewer suspects similar sloppiness in the lab
 Style
Clear, orderly presentation
Reads comfortably
Science vs literature
 Writing
Reshape, refine, tighten up
Juggle words, change sentences around
Strengthen transition between sentences
Check narrative flow
After several drafts ask for a second
opinion
 Writing: Sentences

Only one idea in a sentence

Keep short: <20 words
Vary length
Long sentences: greater risk of grammatical
error
 Writing: Paragraph

The unit of thought in a group of sentences

Subheading over each one in early drafts
Not too long solid block of printing (<125
words)
Long paragraph: bad
Writing: Narrative Flow

Telling a story
Reader follows from start to end
Writing is sequential: logic is the glue
Sentences hold hands
Smooth transitions
Every step is inevitable
 Typing
Clean
Wide margins (2.5 cm)
On one side of the sheet only
Adherence to the style of the
journal
Proofread, proofread, proofread
 Effective Scientific Writing
Correct use of units
The correct term for weight is mass
Units such as cm/h, mg/mL, mL/kg/min and l/g are
written as cm h-1, mg mL-1, mL kg-1min-1 and L g-1
respectively
Centrifugation units given in g
Greek symbols
Use proper symbols for +/- i.e. , and for degrees i.e.C
(Celsius)
Space between number and unit (2 cm NOT 2cm)
 Authorship
Decided as early as possible
Should include persons who:
- Can defend the intellectual content, including data
and conclusions
- Must be willing to concede publicly any errors
- In the case of fraud be willing to state publicly the
nature and extent, and account for its occurrence
 Authorship:
Criteria

All the following criteria should be met:

- Generate at least part of the intellectual
content (conception or design, data
analysis and interpretation)
- Drafting, reviewing or revising critically for
important intellectual content
- Final approval of the version to be published
 Authorship: Order
Some journals use the alphabetical order
Most of them assume an order based on each
authors importance to the study
- The first author is primarily responsible for
collecting and analyzing data, and writing
- The last one, an established investigator,
assumes the overall responsibility for the study
- The middle authors are listed according to heir
order of importance to the study
Authorship: Responsibilities
The authors must comply with the following rules
when submitting the manuscript for publication:
The manuscript is not under consideration elsewhere and
the research will not be submitted elsewhere until a final
decision has been made by the journal
The manuscript is a trustful, original work without
fabrication, fraud or plagiarism
The authors have made an important scientific contribution
and are familiar with the primary data
The authors have read the manuscript and take
responsibility for its content, and understand that if the
paper, or part of it, is found to be faulty or fraudulent, they
share responsibility
 Benefits of Writing
Benefit greater to author than reader
Invaluable mental discipline
Enhances clear thinking
Making a subject intelligible to others
means you understand it
Improve your reading skills
Satisfies a creative instinct
 Beginnings prepare readers for
understanding the work

Title orients readers to

document

Summary tells readers what

happens in document

Introduction prepares readers

for the middle
A document's introduction prepares
readers for the discussion

Topic?
Importance?
Background?
Arrangement?

Introduction
The introduction defines the scope
and limitations of the work

Women may not Medical histories

experience the not considered
same effects scope

Proposed Study
on Effects of Alcohol
on Life Expectancy
Ten-year study
Three classes of drinkers:
non-drinkers
moderate drinkers
heavy drinkers
Men surveyed

Other effects,
such as exercise,
not considered

limitations
 Forms of Publishing

Case reports
Clinical pearls
Letters to the editor
Book reviews
Editorials
Poster/paper presentations
Review articles
Survey articles
Monographs
Original research
Book chapters
Books (electronic and print)
 Other Ways of Getting Involved

Review book concepts

Serve on editorial boards
Peer review journal articles
Review book chapters
Serve as section editor for a book
 Common Barriers to Writing

Finding the time to write

Selecting a topic
Finding colleagues to collaborate with
Funding
Intimidation by the publication process
Following author instructions
Internal review process
Peer review
Acceptance, modification, resubmission
Rejection!
 Making the Time to Write

Make it a priority
Schedule time to write each day
Outline your concept
Create a schedule and stick to it
Work with collaborators
Get supervisors buy-in
If you get stuck, talk with your publisher
Dont bite off more than you can chew
 Plan the Process

Have something important to say

Understand the target audience
Who cares?
Select the right tone and model
Delivery method
Where to submit?
Do your homework on background and
references
Pay attention to the submission guidelines
 Authorship Issues

Select a lead author at the outset

Decide how work will be divided
Select co-authors based on what they bring
to the project
Plan regular contact with co-authors
Avoid the ego trap
Be professional, not political
Writing is a commitment
Acknowledge contributions appropriately
 Tips on Writing

Work from an outline

Dont kill your own creativity
Use active voice
Enlighten, dont anesthetize
Have your work reviewed prior to
submission
Aim for an error-free final manuscript
Have fun with it
 General Tips

Read good writing

Discuss your work, and the work of
others
Visit poster sessions
Welcome your editors input
Read and reread Elements of Style by
William Strunk, Jr. and E.B. White
Write every day
Did I mention have fun?
 Complete Proposals Should Contain

Statement of scope and intent

Physical specifications of the publication
Draft table of contents
Sample material
Curriculum vita
 Statement of Scope and Intent

Purpose
Approach
Subject
Audience
Timing Considerations
Illustrations and Features
Delivery Elements
Competition
 Physical Specifications

Trim Size
Printed Pages
Illustrations
Other special design elements
 Reference to Get You Started
Huth EJ. Writing and Publishing In Medicine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins; 1999
Iverson C, Flanagin A, Fontanarosa PB et al. American Medical Association
Manual of Style: A Guide for Authors and Editors. 9th ed. Baltimore, MD:
Williams & Wilkins; 1998
Hamilton, CW. How to Write and Publish Scientific Papers: Scribing Information
for Pharmacists. Am J Hosp Pharm 1992; 49:2477-84
Miller LG. Research Guidelines for the Pharm.D. Practitioner.
Pharmacotherapy 1994; 14(6):740-2
Zellmer WA. How to Write a Research Report for Publication. Am J Hosp
Pharm 1981; 38:545-50
Woodward DK, Clifton GD. Development of a Successful Research Grant
Application. Am J Hosp Pharm 1994; 51:813-22
Motheral BR, Jackson TR. Understanding and Evaluating Original Research
Articles. J Am Pharm Assoc 1999; 39:759-74
Scientific Writing Links. http://spot.colorado.edu/~carpenh/links.htm
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform Requirements for
Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for
Biomedical Publication. Updated November 2003. www.icmje.org