Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cost saving
There are no detrimental effects on concrete & it is expected that the increase in the cost of
cement could be offset by the lower cost of Recycled Concrete Aggregate (RCA).
Save environment
There is no excavation of natural resources & less transportation.
Less land is required.
Less emission of carbon due to less crushing.
Save time
There is no waiting for material availability.
Job opportunity
Creates employment opportunities and economic activities in recycling industries
LIMITATIONS OR DISADVANTAGES OF RECYCLING
OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL
Material testing
1. Crushing test
2. Abrasion test
3. Impact test
4. Shape test
Strength testing
1. Compressive strength test.
2. Flexural test
3. Tensile test
LITERATURE REVIEW
SR. TITLE AUTHOR CONCLUSION
NO
1. An experimental study B.Sasikala. Cement replaced with 20, 30 &
on behaviour of K.Shanthi. 40% GGBFS and NA replaced
recycled aggregate B.Jose with 25, 50,100% RA, reduces the
concrete with GGBS RavindraRaj.(2017) strength of concrete and the
International journal percentage reduction in the
of engineering concrete was observed in the
sciences & research range of 25 to 50%. Concrete
Technology with 50% RA and 40% GGBFS
ISSN: 2277-9655 gives reasonable compressive
strength of 32.9 MPa at the age
of 28 days
comparing to desired value of
50 MPa.
SR TITLE AUTHOR CONCLUSION
NO.
2. To study the partial Sonali K.Galpalliwar Here they have conducted an
of cement by GGBS R.S.devtale(2014) experiment on hardened
IOSR Journal of concrete with 10%, 20% and 30%
mechanical and civil replacement of cement by
engineering. GGBS. The test results prove that
P-ISSN 2320-33x vol.1 the maximum 28 days split
PP-69-77 tensile strength was obtained
with 30% replaced with cement.
The maximum 28 days flexural
strength was obtained at the
cement was replaced with 20%
of GGBS.
SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW
Aging of the specimens increased the compressive and tensile strengths
irrespective of the mix proportion increases and further increase in RA and
slag percentage, decreased the compressive and tensile strengths of the
specimens.
Cement replaced with 20, 30 & 40% GGBFS and NA replaced with 25,
50,100%RA, reduces the strength of concrete and the percentage
reduction in the concrete was observed in the range of 25 to 50%.
Concrete with 50% RA and 40% GGBFS gives reasonable compressive
strength of 32.9 MPa at the age of 28 days comparing to desired value of
50 MPa.
Hence it is suggested that construction engineer can do mix design for 50
MPa concrete to obtain 30 MPa when replacing 50% NA and 40% cement
in the field.
METHODOLOGY FLOW CHART
Objectives
Property Testing of
Materials
Compressive Strength
Test
Conclusion
THANK YOU!