Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lab Group B
Local
Selective High Alert Medications
Hospital based
Administration
Patient Verification
5 Rights
State
Arizona hospitals have implemented dual verification of hospital
based selective medications
Tucson
St. Joseph Hospital
Tucson Medical Center
Phoenix
Phoenix Childrens Hospital
Gilbert
Dignity Health Mercy Hospital
Sierra Vista
Canyon Vista Medical Center
Current Practice
National
New Zealand
Canada
United States
Malaysia
Taiwan
England
Australia
Scotland
Analysis of Current Research: Current Findings
6 studies suggest double checking reduced medication
errors
1 study argues double checking is helpful for only specific medications
2 studies identify double checks to be effective, but also identify other more
effective interventions
3 studies establish that a two nurse check is effective in preventing med
errors
Nurses were given a 2-week start-up period to allow nurses to become familiar with the
double checking steps while getting feedback
Gave detailed descriptions of core subprocesses, so everyone had the same understanding
when answering survey questions.
Small uni-site study: unable to determine if the interventions can be translated to other
facilities
Only used meds given during the morning and afternoon, no meds given in emergency
situations
All the participating hospital were located in the same state, reducing generalizability
Hawthorne effect
The availability of participants and timing of interviews caused the data saturation not to be
achieved
Limitations of All Studies
Double checking: A second look
Only looks at data from one study, and are not generalizable to a variety of contexts
Has a weak evidence base from just one study
Some nurses may not have followed the intervention protocol fully or failed to record
observed errors.
Specific steps of double checking procedures in specific units may not have been taken into
account
Relatively low response rate (112 questionnaires and only 48 were returned)
Study occurred at a critical time when the hospital was implementing many changes
Evidence Based Nursing Recommendations
4/7/17 - Begin to provide education to the hospital staff (mandatory paid learning
clinics); begin creating double-check sign/override system in charting
4/28/17 - All training complete; all nurses have signed double-checking contracts;
double-check sign/override system complete
5/7/17, 5/14/17, 5/21/17, 5/28/17 - Weekly monitoring of new policy and charting
system changes
$34.14/hour
Risk:
Inconsistent
expectation for what
constitutes a double
check
Benefit:
Implement Checks
Computerized Checks
Environment
Education
Research Summary
Medication errors are a significant issue, and Ultimately double
checking is well supported and current practice does verify high acuity
medications.
Data from 6 of the 9 articles fully supports efficacy of double checks.
Limitations in the other 3 were guideline/implementation confusion,
not contradicting use of double checks
Strong studies w/ large studies with large samples, variables take into
consideration, like age and gender, varied units, varied facilities, detail
and unanimously supported either the implementation or further
research
Weak data: time issues, no emergency admin/ error data, not
exhaustive errors, bias, Hawthorn effect.
Monetarily, it is realistic and cost effective compared to error cost
The benefits outweigh the risk, it just difficult to manage time, and
ensure consistent implementation
References
Alsulami, Z., Choonara, I., & Conroy, S. (2014). Nurses' knowledge about the double-checking process for medicines
administration. Nursing Children and Young People, 26(9), 21-26. doi:10.7748/ncyp.26.9.21.e378
Barras, M., Moore, D., Sweedman, M., Wilkinson, C., Taylor, K., Morton, J. (2013). Reducing the risk of harm from
intravenous potassium: a multi-factorial approach in the haematology setting. Journal of oncology pharmacy practice, 20.
Doi: 10.1177/1078155213504443
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2016, March 30). Occupational Employment Statistics. Retrieved from
https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes291141.htm
Cochran, G. L., Barrett, R. S., & Horn, S. D. (2016). Comparison of medication safety systems in critical access hospitals:
Combined analysis of two studies. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 73(15), 1167-1173.
doi:10.2146/ajhp150760
Cousins, S. (2017, March 29). Phone interview. [Canyon Vista Medical Center]
DeAngelis, T. (2016, September). Preventing medical errors: Psychologists are revamping health-care systems to keep
patients safe from life-threatening mistakes. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/monitor/2016/09/preventing-errors.aspx
Dickinson, A., James, N., McCall, E., Twomey, B. (2010). Pediatric nurses' understanding of the process and procedure
of double-checking medications. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19(5-6), 728-735. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03130.x
Hewitt, T., Chreim, S., & Forster, A. (2015). Double checking: a second look. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice,22(2),
267-274. doi:10.1111/jep.12468
Hughes, R.G., Blegen, M.A. (2008). Patient safety and quality: An evidenced-based handbook for nurses. Rockville: Agency
for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Institute for Safe Medication Practices. (2013, June 13). Independent double-checks: Undervalued and misused: Selective
use of this strategy can play an important role in medication safety. Retrieved from
http://www.ismp.org/newsletters/acutecare/showarticle.aspx?id=51
Johns Hopkins Medicine. (2016, May 3). Study suggests medical errors now third leading cause of death in the u.s.
Retrieved from
http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/media/releases/study_suggests_medical_errors_now_third_leading_cause_of_death
_in_the_us
Keiffer, S., Marcum, G., Harrison, S., Teske, D. W., Simsic, J. M. (2015). Reduction of Medication Errors in a Pediatric
Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit. Journal of Nursing Care Quality., 30(3), doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000098
Kissinger, B. (2016). Does an insulin double-checking procedure improve patient safety? The Journal of Nursing
Administration, 46(3), 154-160. doi:10.1097/NNA.0000000000000314