Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AND ARCHITECTURE
objectives
To understand the concept of sustainability and sustainable planning.
Environmental protection.
Social responsibility.
Economic practice.
Economic Development
This is the issue that proves the most problematic as most people disagree on political
ideology what is and is not economically sound, and how it will affect businesses and by
extension, jobs and employability.
It is also about providing incentives for businesses and other organisations to adhere to
sustainability guidelines beyond their normal legislative requirements. Also, to encourage
and foster incentives for the average person to do their bit where and when they can;
one person can rarely achieve much, but taken as a group, effects in some areas are
cumulative.
The supply and demand market is consumerist in nature and modern life requires a lot of
resources every single day; for the sake of the environment, getting what we consume
under control is the paramount issue. Economic development is about giving people what
they want without compromising quality of life, especially in the developing world, and
reducing the financial burden and red tape of doing the right thing.
Social Development
Urban planners that are interested in achieving sustainable development or sustainable cities use
various design principles and techniques when designing cities and their infrastructure. These
include Smart Growth theory, Transit-oriented development, sustainable urban infrastructure and
New Urbanism.
Smart Growth is an urban planning and transportation theory that concentrates growth in infill
sites within the existing infrastructure of a city or town to avoid urban sprawl; and advocates
compact, transit-oriented development, walk able, bicycle-friendly land use, including mixed-use
development with a range of housing choices.
New Urbanism is more of a social and aesthetic urban design movement than a green one, but it
does emphasize diversity of land use and population, as well as walk able communities which
inherently reduce the need for automotive travel.
Both urban and rural planning can benefit from including sustainability as a central criterion when
laying out roads, streets, buildings and other components of the built environment.
Conventional planning practice often ignores or discounts the natural configuration of the land
during the planning stages, potentially causing ecological damage such as the stagnation of streams,
mudslides, soil erosion, flooding and pollution.
Applying methods such as scientific modeling to planned building projects can draw attention to
problems before construction begins, helping to minimize damage to the natural environment.
Cohousing is an approach to planning based on the idea of intentional communities. Such projects
often prioritize common space over private space resulting in grouped structures that preserve more
of the surrounding environment.
Watershed assessment of carrying capacity; estuary, riparian zone restoration and groundwater
recharge for hydrologic cycle viability; and other opportunities and issues about Water and the
environment show that the foundation of smart growth lies in the protection and preservation of
water resources. The total amount of precipitation landing on the surface of a community becomes
the supply for the inhabitants. This supply amount then dictates the carrying capacity - the potential
population - as supported by the "water crop.
Sustainable architecture
This design practice emphasizes efficiency of heating and cooling systems; alternative energy
sources such as solar hot water, appropriate building siting, reused or recycled building materials;
on-site power generation - solar technology, ground source heat pumps, wind power; rainwater
harvesting for gardening, washing and aquifer recharge; and
on-site waste management such as green roofs that filter and control storm water runoff. This
requires close cooperation of the design team, the architects, the engineers, and the client at all
project stages, from site selection, scheme formation, material selection and procurement, to
project implementation.
Sustainable architects design with sustainable living in mind. Sustainable vs green design is
the challenge that designs not only reflect healthy processes and uses but are powered by
renewable energies and site specific resources. A test for sustainable design is can the
design function for its intended use without fossil fuel unplugged. This challenge suggests
architects and planners design solutions that can function without pollution rather than just
reducing pollution. As technology progresses in architecture and design theories and as
examples are built and tested, architects will soon be able to create not only passive, null-
emission buildings, but rather be able to integrate the entire power system into the building
design.
Design for reuse and recycling: "Products, processes, and systems should be
designed for performance in a commercial 'afterlife'.
Design impact measures for total carbon footprint and life-cycle
assessment for any resource used are increasingly required and
available. Many are complex, but some give quick and accurate
whole-earth estimates of impacts.
Thats almost 66 billion of us. Currently there are 7 billion humans on the planet so theoretically we
still have a way to go before we max out on population, that is, if all we want to do is eat rice. Of
course there are lots of factors that reduce this potential carrying capacity number. These include:
Continued population growth in areas of the world currently already suffering from population stress
Freshwater stress including water usage competition between urban and rural environments
Reduced agricultural land from poor farming practices
Deforestation
Desertification
Climate change
Rising sea levels
And war, disease, pestilence and plague.
For humans in the 21st century it is clear that we cannot continue to have one part of the planet
consuming at an unsustainable level while other human populations subsist on very little but it is also
true that there remains some wiggle room to give us time to fix the problem. All it takes is global
leadership focused on sustainability. But if the recent Rio+20 conference is an example of what our
leaders are capable of doing then we need to find others to provide us with guidance to achieve our
common planetary goal. National self-interest cannot continue to impede all of humanity. We are a
global society and we need to make global decisions about managing our ecological footprint. That
way we can find a sustainable medium for all in the remainder of the 21st century and beyond.
Bio diversity
Biodiversity is the degree of variation of life forms within a given species, ecosystem, biome, or
planet. Terrestrial biodiversity tends to be highest at low latitudes near the equator which seems
to be the result of the warm climate and high primary productivity. Marine biodiversity tends to
be highest along coasts in the Western Pacific, where sea surface temperature is highest and in
mid-latitudinal band in all oceans. Biodiversity generally tends to cluster in hotspots, and has
been increasing through time but will likely slow in the future.
Rapid environmental changes typically cause mass extinctions. One estimate is that <1%-3% of
Since life began on Earth, five major mass extinctions and several minor events have led to large
and sudden drops in biodiversity. The Phanerozoic eon (the last 540million years) marked a rapid
growth in biodiversity via the Cambrian explosiona period during which the majority of multi-
cellular phyla first appeared. The next 400million years included repeated, massive biodiversity
losses classified as mass extinction events. In the Carboniferous, rainforest collapse led to a
great loss of plant and animal life. The PermianTriassic extinction event, 251million years ago,
was the worst; vertebrate recovery took 30million years. The most recent, the Cretaceous
Paleogene extinction event, occurred 65million years ago and has often attracted more attention
than others because it resulted in the extinction of the dinosaurs.
The period since the emergence of humans has displayed an ongoing biodiversity reduction and
an accompanying loss of genetic diversity. Named the Holocene extinction, the reduction is
caused primarily by human impacts, particularly habitat destruction. Conversely, biodiversity
impacts human health in a number of ways, both positively and negatively.
Biodiversity in buildings The new challenge for
Architecture
The political focus on global warming has tended to reduce the importance architects attach to
protecting biodiversity. Yet the impact architecture has upon ecosystems, both at the building and
further afield, is enormous.
Architects impact upon biodiversity in five main ways:
Decisions regarding roofs, walls, landscape
Materials used in construction- their sourcing, assembly and disposal
Resources needed to sustain buildings in use (energy, water etc)
Adverse affects of buildings in terms of air and water pollution
Conservation and rehabilitation of existing structures.
These can be considered in isolation or as a system of inter-connected factors. Architects could
see the new regulations as an opportunity to connect architecture and nature. Buildings and
cities have a surprisingly big impact upon habitats and the many vulnerable species that they
contain. These impacts are often far way and hence are easily ignored or subject to 'greenwash'
standards (as in timber sourcing). Also many of the impacts are insidious such as polystyrene
beads and plastic fragments which end up choking our rivers and killing marine life. These are
often the result of packaging from the building site. Biodiversity is the Cinderella of the green
movement in architecture.
Biodiversity is defined as having three main levels. It is concerned with habitats (wetlands,
rainforests, coral reefs); individual species (bat, bird, plant, insect etc); and genetic diversity
within species (this is why genetic modification matters). Although architecture does not
traditionally concern itself with such matters, the growth of sustainability as an ever-expanding
set of global narratives and regulation exposes building design and construction to the close
Some architects have already started to fill in the gap in our knowledge and sought to influence practice.
The 'cradle to cradle' idea owes much to an understanding of ecological systems, taking principles from
nature and applying them to buildings. Similarly the 'biomimicry' design movement and such initiatives
as bioclimatic skyscrapers promoted over a decade ago have a clear commitment to addressing
biodiversity. But beyond the formal adoption of ecological principles to design methodology, biodiversity
needs a little more attention in everyday practice.
Nature affects us culturally and spiritually and provides the basis for most of our food, medicines, fibre,
construction materials, fresh water and even energy. According to Ban Ki-moon, the UN Secretary
General, the 'conservation of biodiversity makes a critical contribution to moderating the scale of climate
change and reducing its negative impact by making ecosystems (including human societies) more
resilient'. By linking climate change and biodiversity there is a new agenda for architecture - one that
promises more richness and beauty than buildings intent merely upon reducing their carbon footprints.
One of the key drivers for the loss of global biodiversity is building development. There is insufficient
attention paid to integrating biodiversity policies with strategies for urbanism. Infrastructure
development, mass housing and social programs generally pay scant regard to connections between
biodiversity and human well-being. This is an area where knowledge is poor and action thin on the
ground beyond a few token projects.
Global Biodiversity calls for better 'communication, education and awareness raising' around the topic of
biodiversity. It seeks to influence the indirect drivers (such as architects and the construction industry)
as well as the direct drivers such as fisheries, forestry and agriculture. Biodiversity is becoming a core
issue for many of today's major economic sectors and is increasingly a heading in policies for corporate
Besides the links between strategies for global warming and biodiversity which have
found their way into recent international agreements, another change is the move away
from the pocket approach to habitat protection to that of linear systems. The latter is
driven by the need to establish migration corridors whereby species can move across
urban areas and through the world's expanding deserts as global warming bites. Such
corridors are often based on inland water systems and in Europe involve much habitat
creation on former brown field land. Building in or adjacent to such corridors can do
much to support local and often also global biodiversity.
Biodiversity, quality of life and global warning are directly connected. Architects have a
key role to play alongside their actions to reduce energy consumption. However, unlike
CO2 emissions, the science and knowledge of biodiversity in a building context is less
well developed. The choice between steel, concrete, masonry or timber construction is
complex from an energy point of view let alone the ecological impacts from cradle to
grave. Yet society is moving towards a richer understanding of sustainability where green
roofs, planted facades and construction materials from recycled waste or bio-crops are
not just emblems but serious attempts to address ecological diversity. The failure to
achieve lasting carbon emission targets at COP15 has shifted the green focus onto
However, integrating nature and architecture within the building is by no means
straightforward. Besides the obvious maintenance costs, a living faade may well
obstruct daylight through windows (thereby adding to energy use). Nature is dynamic
whilst architecture is static: the two systems are in conflict unless attention is paid to
zones and layers. Typically a planted faade needs its own sub-frame forward of the
building line with integrated irrigation. A planted roof is also best conceived as another
sheltering layer, one that mediates between the external and internal climate. In spite of
these difficulties recent examples are pointing to a fresh approach to sustainability and
one which carries a great deal of public support.
It has become the ambition of new build to be truly sustainable and what an excellent
goal that is.
But to achieve that goal not only is it important to reach the highest standards for waste
minimization, use of sustainable materials and reducing energy use to achieve low or
zero carbon
buildings; it also needs to retain the value for biodiversity that our built environment has
always
provided.
The need to reduce the carbon footprint of our future (and current) housing stock is
without dispute.
To enable this vital change to come about, new materials, designs and technologies have
evolved
rapidly. But it is likely that these changes to reduce our carbon footprint by making our
buildings
'airtight' will lead to losses in biodiversity associated with our built environment unless
this is
considered early on in the process. It is so important that provision for all this
sustainable development
Energy is transferred between trophic levels when one organism eats another and gets the energy-
rich molecules from its prey's body. However, these transfers are inefficient, and this inefficiency
limits the length of food chains.
When energy enters a trophic level, some of it is stored as biomass, as part of organisms' bodies.
This is the energy that's available to the next trophic level since only energy storied as biomass
can get eaten. As a rule of thumb, only about 10% of the energy that's stored as biomass in one
trophic levelper unit timeends up stored as biomass in the next trophic levelper the same
unit time. This10% rule of energy transferis a good thing to commit to memory.
Climate change
Climate change is now affecting every country on every continent. It is disrupting
national economies and affecting lives, costing people, communities and countries
dearly today and even more tomorrow
Climate change's effects are becoming more evident every day. From changing weather
patterns and reducedwater availability, to deforestation and melting icecaps -- the
examples are all around us. So what are governments and businesses doing to address
the impact ofclimate change?
Governments are putting in place strategies to develop green industries like renewable
energy, and they're enactingregulationsto reduce carbon emissions. On thebusiness
side, companies are minimising their own footprint on the environments and
communities they work in by adoptingcorporate responsibility agendasand by
reviewing theircarbon emissionsandsupply chains.
Affordable, scalable solutions are now available to enable countries to leapfrog to
cleaner, more resilient economies. The pace of change is quickening as more people are
turning to renewable energy and a range of other measures that will reduce emissions
and increase adaptation efforts.
But climate change is a global challenge that does not respect national borders.
Emissions anywhere affect people everywhere. It is an issue that requires solutions that
need to be coordinated at the international level and it requires international
cooperation to help developing countries move toward a low-carbon economy.