Professional Documents
Culture Documents
-Seymour Goldstein
While more turns around a smaller, uniquely shaped 4 mm mandrel has been shown to strip out
higher order modes at 850 nm, the same mandrel cannot be used at the 1300 nm wavelength. Different
loss readings between the two wavelengths will be measured. Furthermore, requiring a very small and
uniquely shaped mandrel design for each wavelength adds complexity and confusion to the testing
process.
Instead of mandrel testing, a more tightly controlled launch condition such as encircled flux (EF)
is therefore required when testing BIMMF—it mitigates the problem of an overfilled launch and leaky
modes while enabling consistent and accurate measurements at both wavelengths.
Modeling and testing on BIMMF has shown that an optimized BIMMF is backward compatible
and can be mixed with non-BIMMF without inducing excess loss. However, this also requires a more
tightly controlled launch such as EF. There is also evidence that connector incompatibility and fiber
geometry differences (core diameter) may cause direction dependence regardless of fiber type.
When testing multimode fiber links, attenuation measurements are greatly influenced by the
launch condition of the light source. Because the use of a BIMMF launch cord with a common mandrel
for both 850 nm and 1300 nm wavelengths causes significantly different results, only non-BIMMF fiber
should be used in launch cords.
To complete a permanent link test using the recommended 1-cord reference method, a receive
cord must be used to provide link attenuation measures that include the installed fiber and the two
connections at each end of the link. While a well-designed BIMMF test cord that matches the installed
cabling core diameter and numerical aperture will work, it is prudent to also use a non-BIMMF as the
receive cord to avoid the possibility of an overly optimistic test result. This is an area that is still being
studied.
Testing BIMMF is really no different than testing other fiber types – it requires an encircled flux
launch and non-BIMMF launch cord attached to the light source, the recommended 1-cord reference
method, and a non-BIMMF receive cord when measuring a permanent link. The good news is that with
Fluke Networks’ EF-compliant CertiFiber® Pro, there is no extra work at all.
To take a closer look at test methods for BIMMF and view the complete steps for measuring and
validating the attenuation of test cords and permanent links, download the Fluke Networks’ white
paper, The Ins and Outs of Testing Bend Insensitive Multimode Fiber (BIMMF): The Need for Encircled
Flux.