Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Backgrounds for the Subject
I have observed actual practices of TQM activities and
TPM activities in various organizations through
examinations for Deming Prize and Awards for PM
Excellence.
Excellent business results could be attained for various
organizations in the world through TQM and TPM.
TQM and TPM are both socio-technical system
approaches which have developed mainly in Japan.
Although TQM and TPM are effective methodologies,
which are continuous organizational kaizen activities
with total participations, no studies through the
empirical action research have ever tried to compare
TQM and TPM under the unified conceptual framework.
2
Contents
TQM and TPM Toward Intelligent
Manufacturing
Review through Comparison between TQM
and TPM
Integration of TQM and TPM as Effective
Management Methodology for Organizational
Kaizen Activities
3
TQM and TPM Toward
Intelligent Manufacturing
4
Adaptation to environmental change: toward continuous growth
Change in environment is universally true: Ideal and reality certainly change
Company is a living system like a creature. Environmental adaptability is the
necessary condition to survive
Be adaptive to the environmental change by establishing response to environmental
change (fluctuation in demand, exchange rate, business condition) and respond to
structural environmental change (Self-organization, innovation)
Pro-actively acknowledge, establish and solve problems: Proactive to
environmental change
Competition for survival by corporate domain: Strategy is the key. Be aware of the
market, competitors and yourself
Establish an image of achieving continuous growth: in which direction should
movement be made to become an excellent company
Establishing organizational capability (core competence) as a requirement for the
realization of continuous growth
SWOT analysis for continuous growth: competition analysis and self-evaluation
Extraction of problems and theme setting for the realization of ideal organizational
capability
Establishment of infrastructure and problem-solving activities to resolve problem
Hiroshima Institute of Technology 5
themes Hiroshi KUBOTA
Outcome of continuous growth: Outer competitiveness
ROE: Sales profit rate, capital turnover rate, shareholders equity to total assets
Profit, stock price, grading
Sales: size, growth rate, share (competitive status of the market: new products,
differentiation, high-value added product, No.1 or No.2 in the industry), component
ratio (product group, industry, customer, domestic and abroad)
Cost; raw material cost, labor cost, fixed and variable cost, distribution cost
Intellectual property, patents
Labor productivity, added value productivity
Total equipment efficiency: hourly operating rate, capability operating rate, non-
defective product ratio
Production capacity, process capability
Inventory: product, in-process inventory, raw material
Quality failure cost: recall, claim, inadequate
Energy, water, industrial waste cost
Safety, sanitary environment: accident, retirement, absence
2.Friendly company
Social responsibility
People-friendly
Eco-friendly
19
Basic Common Property of TQM and TPM
Quality as Fitness;
Claim/Complaint, Unfitness
Evolution of Quality Concepts; Quality Maintenance,
From Fitness to Creation Individual Improvement,
Autonomous Maintenance,
Marketing and Product/Technology Planned Maintenance, Cellular,
Development as Important Areas JIT, Set-up and Adjustment,
21
Unmanned System
From the company’s point of view: From the customer’s point of view:
Challenges in production Challenges in the market
Conformity to Standards:
Control regulation
Fitness for use (Aims and Conditions)
Fitness of Cost : Target costing and Control
Fitness for Latent Requirement
Demand creation
Fitness for Corporate Culture : Brand
Fitness to Social and Global Environment
S.Siba & D.Walden(1993):Four Practical Revolutions in Management, Center for Quality Management,pp.3-17
Hiroshima Institute of Technology 22
Hiroshi KUBOTA
Consistency on Scope and Focus of TQM and TPM
Overt PARTⅠ
Territory
Manufacturing Production Business Process
Site Process 23
Figure 3. Evolution Process of TPM Activities
Methodology and Tools
Many Methodologies of TQM/TQC has been Build in TPM;
Policy Management, Quality Function Deployment, Autonomous
Activities, Statistical Methods, Reliability and so on
Engineering Approach
Social Scientific Approach 24
By demonstrated the Evidence
Methods for Activation of Kaizen Activities
5S and Visualization(Show and Share);
Creation of Ideas
Single Set-up and Adjustment, JIT Production System
Elimination of Non Value Operation, Simple Automation,
Kaizen of equipment
30
From the View of Customer Value and Quality Creation
Management and Kaizen through TQM
1) New Products and Competitive Position in the Target Market;
Concurrent Engineering, Customer Relationship Management,
Customer Satisfaction/Delight, Zero Claim, Quick Response
2) Decreasing Defects/Defectives; Quality Assurance/ Improvement
3) Speed Economic Effects and Cost Reduction;
Reduction of Cycle Time and Lead Time, CR/QA, Speed QA
4) Zero Emission and Reuse/Recycle of Resources and Utilities
5) Quality of Work Life; Work Environment and Healthy/Safety
32
Definition and Estimation of Opportunity Losses
Kaizen Activities through TPM
1) Innovative Progress of Product performance;Technological Establishment
2) Realization of Zero defect;
Improvement and maintenance of Good Quality Conditions on Production
3) Dramatic Cost Reduction; New Method/Material, Modular Assemble on
Parts, Integration of Lines, Extension of Tools’ life, Breakdown/Trouble
Zero, Stockless, Less Energy, Waiting/Stopping Zero, Less Transportation
4) Epoch-making Increasing Capacity and Substantial Reduction of Lead
Time; Flexible Straight Lines
5) Active Promotion of Environmental Maintenance and Safety & Sanitation;
5R(Refine, Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Retrieve Resources)
6) Minimizing Investment; Renewal Retro-Equipment, Simple Automation
by Karakuri Kaizen
6) Activation of Organization and Development of Creative Talented People;
Workshop of Kaizen, Maintenance, Quality, Skill and so on
TQM;
Organizational
Activation
TPS TMS
(TOYOTA (TOYOTA
Production System) Marketing System)
Socio-Technical Activities
(Resources)Input-Process-Output(Results)
35
Management Technology on Management Implementation
Manufacturing Innovation and Strategy
for Realizing Quality Creation
Japanese style brand strategy for customer value creation should be
developed without depending mythology.
Manufacturing innovation should be pursued with making the most of
strength on Japanese manufacturing skills and organizational culture
such as continuous kaizen with company-wide and in thoroughgoing of
the scene and actual thing.
In order to successful manufacturing innovation three management
technologies (TQM, TPM and TPS) should be integrated and exploited
effectively such as customer in straight production system, construction
of brand DNA, customer value assurance related with QFD, definition
and reduction toward zero for theoretical loss and ideal loss, total
optimum based on through-bottleneck analysis and TOC,
thoroughgoing pursuance of less (trouble less, process less, setup time
less and so on).
36
Toward to Integration of TQM and TPM
Because both TQM and TPM are management technologies for socio-
technical management system and goal-seeking organizational activities
to achieve its mission and objectives, they are able to integrate mutual
complementally.
TPM has many excellent concepts of loss, step evolution for each
activity’s area, PM analysis, through-neck analysis, workshop such as
karakuri kaizen and autonomous maintenance, and so on, could be
embed in TQM enlarge to quality of management.
Since the effectiveness of technological site for any applied
methodology/tool could be evaluated by results with rationality
correspondence with each issues, in any application the selection from
methodology and tool of TQM and TPM should be made for copying
with each special problem.
Since social site of the integration may connote complicated strong
psychological resistance, excellent leadership and commitment of top
management is essential to successful integretion.
Effective problem solving activities should be implemented creatively
for overcoming issues abstracted through pursuing the ideal
appropriate states by cross-functional project teams with relation to
policy management. 37
Summary
Methodologies in TQM and TPM could be integrated.
TQM and TPM should de refused to exploit effectively.
TQM should be implemented so as to realize
organizational development and effective utilization of
good relationship with stakeholder
Quality has been the essential subject should be
pursued perpetually.
Any organization ought to implement effective problem
solving activities for kaizen.
Fundamental requirements and causal model for
effective problem solving could be presented.
Top management should perform leadership and
commitment for organizational kaizen activities.
38
Appendix 1
Introduction to TQM
39
Customer shows their
interest and begin to think of
purchasing Market
*Business will not be realized without the customer and their support
*Market creation and concerted effort for customer acquisition
*Harsh competition not only domestically but also overseas
Create customer
Pursue “Quality” from Customer value
Customer will be satisfied
Quality of
activity, work, system, Bundle of customer needs Fulfill needs
employee Varied needs (demand, standard,
aspiration level)
Check-Analyze Check-
Analyze Do Do Act Plan
Activity system
Transaction/ Output Output quality
Input
conversion
Management
With control items With items to be checked
*Regulate satisfactory demand of *Grasping of major cause by identifying
output the cause related factors and process
*Judgment standard, normality, abnormality analysis
*Sensitivity for and countering abnormality *Judgment standard for normal and abnormal
process maintenance, technology, *Rules for abnormality countermeasure and
capability, system, rule practice
*Visible management and 5S *Good Conditions keeping for process
*Cause analysis and recurrence prevention maintenance, education & training
Hiroshima Institute of Technology 45
Hiroshi KUBOTA
Achievement of corporate objectives
Realization of the organization with vital presence
Achievement of organizational mission, continuous securement of appropriate profit
Favorable relationship with customers, employees, society, business partners, shareholders
Enhancement of satisfaction
Provision of products and services that could generate high customer satisfaction
Resources
e) Participation of employees
f) Cooperation with partners
Establishment of oneself
d) Acknowledge competence
Organizational culture
j) Organizational and individual learning
k) Speed
l) Independence
Make cost reduction and quality assurance inseparable: tools and systems
Quality integration in development Minimizing pilot products Measures toward market change
Production System
Related to TQM & TPM
56
Changing Uncertain Management
Environment( Economics,
Technology, Society and so on)
Adaptation;
Creation / Self-reorganization
Organizational
Retention of Behavior
Market /
Customer Great Important of Fundamentals,
Flexible Correspondence to Changes,
Company Challenge to Opportunity ;Kaizen
Group of
Human; Fundamental Requirements for
Activation of Survival / Growth of any Company
Organization 57
Requirements of the Production System
Under Changing Environment and Unfolding Mega-
competition in the world,
Self-reorganization should be pursued for Adapting
Environmental changes and Ensuring Competitive
Position in the Global Markets through Kaizen Activities;
Objectives of Kaizen Activities are
Competitive Customer Value Creation/Customer
Satisfaction and Superior Financial Results through
1)Quality Creation and Quality Assurance
2)Target Costing and Lean Operation
3)Shortening Lead Time and Decreasing Inventory
Kaizen Activities intend to
the Customer in Planned Ordering Straight Production
based on determinate orders from customers through
eliminating any opportunity loss 58
Production Management System
Orders Orders
Resolution & Casting
Raw Materials (Automation system)
Products
Just in
Just in Time Time
Processing by Machine
(cellular system)
Supplier Parts
Market;
Assembling & Testing Dealer
(pull system)
Customer
Lean Operation
Just in Time
Customer Value
(Physical Activities)
and Customer
(Kaizen Activities)
Satisfaction
(Brand DNA build in)
59
Basic Conceptual Model of Production System
Fundamental Technology and Skill for Supporting
Production system
Flexible Automation System for Resolution & Casting;
Various robots for operation and transformation
Automatic set up
Common processing elements by product design
Cellular System for machine processing;
Multi-skill development, Automatic set up & part feeder
Pull production for assembling;
From estimated demands to determinate demands
Line balancing , Automatic set up & part feeder
5S(seisou-clean,seiri-in order,seiton-tidy,seiketu-neat,shituke-discipline)
Visualization, Autonomous Maintenance, Small group activities
Workshops(Dojyo) for Kaizen, maintenance, skill, quality and so on
60
5R(Refine, Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Retrieve Resources)
Kaizen Changes of Production Activities
Factory Instruction in
Office
Real Time
Production Demand Information
Lines From Customers
In order to review
Evaluation on Results of Kaizen Activity
Decision of the Direction and Priority of Kaizen Activities
68
Variables of the System Model
1) (Constraint Variables)
Environmental Input Variables; The number of
Customer/Dealer, Confirmed/Unconfirmed Demands
2) (Independent Control Variables)
Policy Variables; Target Delivery, Inventory System
Organizational Input Variables; The number of Items and Processes
Manipulation Variables; Lead Time for Each Process,
Inventory Level Set for Each Item
3) (Provability Variables)
Noise Variables; Lead Time Delay with Occurrence of Troubles
4) (Objective Variables)
Output Variables; Lead Time for each order, Probability of
Attaining the Target Variables, Inventory Cost, Production Cost
69
Premises of the System Model
Material/parts could be supplied Just in Time to each
process
Any production capacity has been secured
The arrival time of each demand order is random
variable
Physical distribution lead time is omitted
Fundamental Management
73
Three Fundamental Methods in Management
Static Management
①Vertical Management:Daily Management (Operational Control
by rank, Department-wise Management)
Management of system and practice of all activities that must be
properly done on a daily basis to accomplish objectives to
operate effectively in each department
②Horizontal Management:Cross-Functional Management
(Function-wise Management, Objective-wise Management,
Cross-Functional Cooperation)
Management of processes: from the entire organizational
(business division) point of view, that ranges across departments
with functions such as Quality, Cost and Delivery (Management
objectives, in other words, management factors)
Dynamic Management
③Policy Management (Management of the entire
organization in accordance with the business
environment)
Management which enables to surely solve corporate
management assignments, by tailoring directions as an
entire organization, that are considered difficult to
implement satisfactorily with existing management
system so as to comply with the business environment
and achieve the vision of the corporation
Policy Management
76
Policy Management (Management by Policy
and/or Management through Policy
Determination of
Analysis of Review of former year
Mid-/long-term management plan
Social Movement
Designation of Corporate Policy
Clarification of problems
through year-end review
SWOT Analysis for strategy planning
From the standpoint of organizational capacity and capability
to realize sustainable growth
Threats Opportunities
External ←
Weaknesses Strengths
→ Internal
Negative ← → Positive
Example of deployment in objectives/means for
Policy Management
Objective Principle *Suggestion on assignments and measures
Top Management
Items Means *Clarification of Business Unit in charge
level
Principle *Clarification of
Department level Objective
Report Means person in charge
Items
*Delve into the theme
Objective Principle
Section level Report
Items Means
Individual level
Deploying policy using two-way chart of
objectives and means
【Source: Dr. Yoji Akao(1988),
‘Practice of Policy Management’ ,p.10, JSA】
Div. Objectives
Dep. Objectives
Div. Means
Dep. Means
Dep. Objectives
Sec. Objectives
Dep. Means
Sec. Means
to
Sections
Top Management Diagnosis
in Policy Management
Deployment of Policy
Outline of Strategic Seven Tools (S7)
(1) Environment Analysis: Grasp the movement of external
surrounding environment as well as structure, characteristics and
attractiveness of the industry:
Macroscopic Analysis: Analysis on industrial structure and
competitiveness
(2) Product Analysis: Clarifying the distinction of management
elements such as quality of product (incl. service), price, etc. by
comparison with competitors’:
Grasp the strategy of competitors by clarifying the distinctions,
comparison with competitors’ management elements with quality
aspects such as fundamental capability, operationality, reliability,
durability, security, environmental design, maintainability, service,
etc. from a cost aspect
(3) Market Analysis: Discovering the superiority of self-products in
the market segment by grasping customers needs and the attributes
of customers who purchase:
Analysis of customers needs based on required quality deployment
and analysis of attributes of customers who purchase
(4) Product-Market Analysis: Grasp the situation of
products corresponding to customer needs by combining
the results of Product Analysis and Market Analysis
Grasp the positioning of your company and competitors
and the situation of the competition by creating a
Product-Market matrix out of product and market
segments, and by mapping the products of your company
and competitors
(5) Product Portfolio Analysis (PPM): Make the order of
product priority by the superiority of your product group
in the market in relation to competitors’:
Prioritize products of your company by reviewing the
balance using a matrix plotting the self-products and the
competitors, using the competitive advantage of a product
as the horizontal axis and the attractiveness of the
industry as the vertical axis.
(6) Strategic Element Analysis: Build the foundation of a policy by
extracting key factors which largely influence a business
strategy:
Narrow down the strategic elements by classifying business
functions such as R&D, production, etc. and management
elements such as quality, cost, quantity, delivery, security,
environmental design, etc., and extracting a strategy in
accordance with business characteristics
(7) Resource Allocation Analysis: Allocate management resources
such as manpower, machines, money and time properly, in order
to achieve strategic objectives:
Assign priority of investment to products according to
expectations of future business using time series PPM. Then,
allocate resources to the function that should be strengthened
deliberately using a matrix of products and functions
【Source: Dr. Hiroshi Osada(1996), Strategic Policy Management in TQM Era, JUSE】
■What is Cross-Functional Management?
Cross-Functional Management is the management activity that
is practiced in cooperation with all members composing the
organization
across divisions, departments and sections cross functionally
working on each fundamental management factor such as
quality, cost, safety with the goal of common purpose and view
so as to achieve it effectively.
This management system is suitable for members, composing the
organization, to proceed with business operations which hold a
close relationship to each other
Cross Functional Management
99
■Three major functions of Cross Functional Management
① Function that makes plan and adjustment from the corporate
or long-term point of view, which tends to be lost from sight
by individual departments
② Function that promotes Quality assurance, environment
management, employee satisfaction, etc. which are liable to
become of less interest to individual departments, although
they are determined to be objectives by the company
③ Function that deals with special operations in blocks which
are required for each department such as management of
procurement, information, technology, overseas business and
education
Example of Cross-Functional Management
◎:Closely related ○:Related △:Less related
Quality ◎ ◎ ◎ ◎ ◎ ◎
Cross-Functional
Cost ◎ ◎ ◎ ◎ ○ ○
Management
Technology ○ ◎ ○ ○ △ ○
Production △ ○ ◎ ○ ◎ ◎
Sales ◎ ○ △ △ ○ ◎
HR/Admin. ○ ○ ○ ○ ◎ ○
Department-Wise Management
Challenges for Quality Assurance in Business Operation
Business operation that makes customers happy: add value to the products
(Win-Win relationship).
Remove problems that the customer has trouble with, given up or hasn’t noticed.
Reliable (timely provision of information and assistance),
establishing human network and favorable relationships.
Not only securing orders but also gaining understanding and insight into
customer’s status and needs:
Grasp and provide the useful information in a timely manner for new product
development that makes customers happy.
Identify customer demand and specific condition:
eliminate singular variation and add design specs and drawings
Demand for the product specs that can promise sales growth:
In order to secure all orders, response to customer demands needs to be reviewed
Understand the background and the meaning of each customer’s demand,
adjustment and negotiation for the ideal specs
Pitfalls of engineer’s goodwill and effort (too late in asking for support)
Engineers tend to keep problems to themselves (unable to reach solution despite
their utmost effort)
Grasp progress and provide instruction to avoid helpless situations
Clarify the intent and coherency among concepts, specs and design
Design must match the needs of the person who solves the problem and be
coherent to purpose, intent and plan.
Visualization of the concept to deepen one’s thinking, implement adequate
adjustment, examination and instruction
Make a virtual catalog and user instructions when the product is in the conceptual
phase
Identify the sales point/ customer value/ using condition/ operation manual in order
to make effective design review and to avoid a return to the design stage
Information system:
Total concept
Utilization of IT
Conception chart
Hiroshima Institute of Technology 107
Hiroshi KUBOTA
Spirit of researchers and engineers who engage in R&D
Enthusiastically talk about dreams:
Product is a piece of work. Process/ Technique is an asset
Self innovation: every individuals seeks the ideal
Become creative: Spirit of engagement
In order for each engineers to enhance their level
Innovate work process, way of thinking, action pattern
Vitality in each engineers
Be proud of the technology each engineers potentially possesses
to develop new product
In order to enhance the level of outcome
Understand the market and customer: Seeing and thinking are believing
Share the scenario, courage to show and see the scenario, gather knowledge
Offer information, interaction/joint research and development with external institutions
Other concerns?
In what circumstances do the concerns actually appear?
Other causes?
Good Discussion
Concern regarding the change (failure mode)
Cause of concern
Design Review
Reflect on the design Reflect on the evaluation
Confirm implementation items
Good Design Review
Other symptoms?
In what situation does that symptom
actually appear as a problem?
Other causes?
How does it effect customers?
Other effects?
What action did you take to avoid the symptom
from actually occurring as a problem?
Other action to be taken?
120
The Power of Workshops
A workshop is the place to exercise activities to create values in relation
to products and customers by the joint work of frontline workers
What are required to power workshops?
1) Never fail to do what you must do
*Clearly define ‘how’, ‘what’ and ‘why’, and practice thoroughly;
Correspond to the situation
*Notice with common recognition; Enthusiasm with skills
*Transform what to do in a changing environment;
Essential to review and visualize
2) Make continuous improvement and education
*Along with corresponding to environmental change, contribute to
enhance the value of social presence by customer creation/satisfaction as
well as competitive advantage/business result excluding waste
P D
Management of C A
important problems Standardization
by priority
Daily Management
A S
Chronic Problems C D
(Improvement Activity)
Decrease in promotion
Promotion of PM activities Decline in efficiency/competitiveness
by other companies
Situation/
Logical and ideal Related theory/experience
phenomenon
Activities that develop and utilize skills Activities that recognize each member
Creation of these situations, atmosphere and culture depend on what manager say and do
Hiroshima Institute of Technology
Hiroshi KUBOTA
Restructuring small group activities
140
Reality (past, present, future)
Observation/ Setting/
Fact Ideal
Prediction Pursuit
Improvement
Innovation Specifying the gap Improvement and
innovative activity is
Problem recognition and motivated by problem
formulation recognition
Conceptual diagram of problem(separation between an
ideal and reality)
Sound demand and scientific approach open possibilities for improvement and
innovation.
141
Harsh and uncertain
Change in ideal image
Environmental change
Comparison
Structural change in
corporate environment Change in reality and fact
Problem recognition
問題の認識
Proactive recognition
Improvement/innovation
Function
改善・変革of self-reform:
Corporate structural innovation will for innovation, leave
no choice but to innovate
Networking and favorable relationship among IT, Information system and stakeholders
143
Problem awareness,
Environmental changes enthusiasm for improvement Problems to be detected
Confirmation and setting of ideal image Observation and prediction of the reality
Theme setting and shared perception (identification of the aim and target)
Clarifying rule and meaning of what is to be achieved
Repetition of breaking
Action,Improve: fortify and improve the process
the existing circumstance
and receiving
Basic benchmarking process top education
Data
Satisfying Scientific method (Induction,
Observed facts communication Deduction, Interpretation)
Observation Reasoning
World of mental (thoughts)
hypothesis
147
QC Story: Task-achieving Theme-setting QC Story: Problem-solving
Select QC story
Set a target Grasp the present state, set a target
Task-achieving
work process
Find where the problem stems Find measure and method
from within the work process
149
Cause-and-effect diagram:
Result (quality characteristic) stems from a cause(major cause)
Pursuit to incorporate quality into the process
Pareto diagram:
There are few important things. Resources and time are limited.
It is necessary to be priority-oriented. Pareto diagram could apply to both priority
orientation in result and cause
Histogram:
There are variables in products and services. It is important to learn from the
variability. 5M: material, machine, manpower, method, measurement vary.
There are identifiable causes and chance causes for the variability. Central
tendency, range and characteristic of the variability and abnormality could be
identified.
Check sheet:
Use designated format and make approach based on the fact.
Effective means to observe and record the actual circumstance objectively.
Designed for both checking and recording purposes.
150
Stratification:
What is fundamentally important when taking measures toward attribution causes
is to “acknowledge the difference”.
Make comparison from a different angle by categorizing attribute in order to
“acknowledge the difference”
Handle the matter differently when target objective varies.
The point is the interaction of one method to another.
Scatter diagram:
Learning “linkage” is effective to handle quantitative causes.
It is likely to be able to take reasonable measures by learning the linkage between
quality characteristics and causes, among quality characteristics, among causes.
Graph:
Utilizes the excellent recognition skill of human.
Enables us to find out abnormality, tendency and the relationship between the whole-
part relationship.
151
Basics and Procedure of Root Cause Analysis
Pursuit to find the reason by setting up hypothesis and examining.
Observe the details from many angles.
5-Gen principle: Gemba, Genbutsu, Genjitsu, Genri, Gensoku.
152
The Key Point of Root Cause Analysis
Recognize the difference and provide adequate response
Effective measure differs when handling different targets.
Start from acknowledging the difference when finding the attribute causes.
153
Past Present Future
Cause-oriented Objective-oriented
Types of problems
Successful Scenario
Aim 2
Conceptual diagram of process from setting the ideal image to setting the aims
155
Identification of the aim (target point)
Set characteristic (aim of the theme)
Set the ideal image required means to achieve the characteristic,
precondition, environmental criteria
Grasp the current status Same item with the ideal image determined
Grasp the ideal as well as the current status Consider overall coherency, left out
items, aim to select sheet
Search for the gap Gap between characteristics and means
Draft the possible aims Aiming point in items of means for characteristic
achievement: Benchmarking
Determine what to aim Evaluation by removing the gap of characteristics
Target setting
What (target item), How much (target value), By when (required period to accomplish)
156
Planning of measures
Focus on the aim, search for the possibility
List the measures (ideas) of achieving the objective based on the
engineering technology
Narrow down the measures
Evaluate by the expected effect only
Forecast the expected effect Forecast the expected effect, compare with the
objective value
Predict the obstruct, Obstruct, negative effect, side-effect upon
examine the preventive measures implementation
Narrow down the scenario Comprehensively evaluate the gains and losses.
Choose the overall successful scenario
Implementation of the successful scenario
Make action plan Schedule and role of the successful scenario
How to respond when encountering an unexpected
Implement the action plan
situation
157
Requirements for New QC Tools
for Creative Thinking
• Restoring Verbal Expression Data
• Inducing Brilliant ideas and Exchanging lively
Conceptual different View
• Enriching the Quality of Plans
• Escaping/Making Free from Omissions / Errors
• Promoting Total Participation and Collaboration
• Making full agreement for everybody involved
• Calling for vivid/unsophisticated description
• Visualizing Interactions of Components and
Wholeness of the system
158
Affinity Diagram (KJ Method)
• A method to identify what the problem is by
integrated data collected from chaotic
circumstance applying mutual affinity. It is
effective when compiling a variety of opinions,
ideas and experiences from different individuals.
159
Main Uses of KJ method
• Setting upon QM policy and Strategic Plan as New
company/plant
• Setting upon QM policy and Strategic Plan on new
grand project, new product and new technology
• Investigating Market Research for QA in order to
entry of new unexperienced market
• Exchanging and Prevailing actively different view /
opinion/ facts, and Reaching common consensus on
cross functional problems
• Activating activities of Project Team, QC circle, Tool
meeting and so on
160
Points of good drawing and effective use
• Collecting data through Brainstorming; dividing
clearly between facts and opinions , describing
concrete not but abstract, warmly welcoming
different opinions
• Writing briefly to cards; per independent minimum
sentence
• Gathering a set of language data cards by affinity;
sentiments not logically
• Making nameplate for a set of language data cards
• Drawing the diagram through organizing group for
sets of the cards under several stages , and
commenting intelligibly the whole structure
161
Relation Diagram
• It is useful when finding adequate solution while
identifying cause and effect among problem and
phenomenon. The principle is whether to remove the
problem from where it stems from or it to have no
effect.
162
Main Uses of Relation Diagram
• Deployment and Decision of QA policy
• Drafting of TQM Promotion Master plan
• Countermeasures to Customer Claim/Complaint
• Quality Kaizen in Manufacturing Process, especially
to Latent Defects
• QC Promotion for Buying and Outsourcing products
• Countermeasures to Troubles on Delivery and Process
Control
• Effective Promotion of Small Group Activities
• Kaizen of Business Operation in Office and
Sales/Marketing
163
Points of good drawing and effective use
• Collecting broad informations as far as possible ;
brainstorming, listening directly gemba operators
• Expressing the lives of the people; not nominal but
brief sentence or language
• Finish drawing with all together in group members
• Putting out much effort for redrawing twice or three
times
• Capturing the root cause but not the middle cause
• Exchanging “why why” questions and answers
• Carrying out immediately actions as possible
• Thinking of the relation where we could cut off for
round circle causes
164
Tree Diagram
• “Deployment of component element”: develops the
component elements of the target to the relationship
of purposes and method. “Deployment of Measures”
: systematically develops the purpose and measures
in order to achieve the objective.
165
Main Uses of Tree Diagram
• Deployment of design quality in new product
development
• Deployment of Assurance Quality and bringing
into QC Process Diagram with each other in order
to ensure QA Activities
• Utilizing it as Cause and Effect diagram
• Deployment of Ideas for problem solving on QCD
etc. in within business corporation
• Deployment of Policy, goals, and strategic
Initiatives
• Making clear Functions of Division / Management
and Pursuing means with business efficiency 166
Points of good drawing and effective use
• Setting objectives and goals: brief express as “in
order to do~for ~ ”, make sure relevancy of the
setting
• Deployment of means
• Evaluation of each means (effectiveness , feasibility,
potential ) ; making effort for realizing and
developing of ideas
• Making cards of means
• Making tree structures consisted from hierarchical
relation between objective and means
• Verifying the attainment of objectives
• Implementation planning to completion
167
Matrix diagram
• Consists of rows and columns. Method that enables
people to observe the response among elements
(phenomenon, cause, method). It identifies the matter
in question and major emphasis by applying
pluralistic thinking.
R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7
L1 ◎ △ ○ ○ △
L2 △ ◎ ○ ○ △
L3 ○ ◎ ◎ ○
L4 ○ △ ○ ◎ ○
L5 △ ○ ○ ◎
L6 ○ ○ △ ◎
168
Main Uses of Matrix Diagram
• Setting of the point aimed for development/ improvement
of the system product
• Quality Deployment of the Materials Product
• Enhancement and establishment of QA System through
Connection Quality Assurance with management functions
• Enhancement of Quality Assessment System
• Investigation of cause for defect at manufacturing process
• Drafting Product Mix Strategy through Linkage Market
between Product
• Making clear Linkage some projects with technology for
the realization
• Search of application fields for Existing technology,
materials / elements and so on
169
Points of good drawing and effective use
• There are derivative types in the matrix diagram as
follows; a) L type : the basic two dimension such as
objectives vs. means, b) T type: combination of two kind
of L types such as defect vs. cause vs. process and
component vs. property vs. use, c) Y type: combination of
three kind of L type such as A vs. B, B vs. C and C vs.
A, d) X type: combination of four kind of L type such as
A vs. B・D, B vs. A・C, C vs. B・D, D vs. A・C, e) C
type: Cubic type such as A vs. B vs. C.
• Should select and use the most relevant matrix type
correspond to objects analyzed and objectives achieved.
170
Process Decision Program Chart(PDPC)
• Method to establish the process that leads to the ideal
result for problems which results could vary along
with the development of the facts.
171
Main Uses of PDP
• Implementation Planning for achieving aggressive
goals
• Setting upon plans for the technology development
theme
• Prediction of any serious accident in the system and
deciding on the thoroughgoing countermeasures
• Countermeasures for defectives occurred in the
manufacturing process
• Planning and choosing of some alternative
countermeasures in the Negotiation Process
172
Points of good drawing and effective use
• Participation and Discussion of relevant persons with
the theme
• Abstraction of the subject matter have to consider
• Enumeration the results predicted for the subject
matter implemented
• Classifying subjects matters due to urgent need, man-
hours, possibility, difficulty and so on.
• Anticipation the most pessimistic/worst for results/
states of subject matters
• Determination of the priority for different property of
contents according to inter dependence
• Predetermination the time schedule to complete the
investigation for the process
173
Arrow Diagram
174
Main Uses of Allow Diagram
• Promotion Planning and its progress management for
new product development / product improvement
• Scheduling and its progress management for the trial
manufacture / mass production
• Synchronization of scheduling with QC activities
• Scheduling and its progress management for the
transfer of plant / periodic maintenance
• Planning of Process Analysis and improvement of
business efficiency
• Scheduling of preparation and its progress
management for QC audit and QC diagnosis / QC and
QC circle conference
175
Points of good drawing and effective use
• Abstraction of works for the project
• Making clear the relation of preceding work and
succeeding work among works
• Abstraction and determination of parallel works
• Use on the dummy work for uniqueness of express a
pair of nodes for any work
• Drawing the allow diagram and estimating the
times/days required for each work
• For each node, earliest node time, latest node time and
slack are calculated, and for works, the earliest start
time, earliest finish time, latest finish time and latest
start time are calculated, and then total float, free float
and critical path can be derived
176
Matrix Data Analysis
(Principal Component Analysis)
• A method for an arrangement of multiple data
with matrix diagram to some representative
characteristics focused on correlation between
data with the least loss on information. It is the
principal component analysis, only numerical
data analysis. X2
Z1 Z2
・ ・
・ ・
X1 ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・ ・
・
・ ・ ・ ・ ・ Xp
177
Main Uses of Matrix Data analysis
to maximize variance of z
• Each principal (z > z >・ ・) is interpreted and attached
1 2
factor
• Systematic classification of common characteristics
according to type for values of the principals(z , z ,・) 1 2
180
Statistical method
Population
Probability distribution, Substance, Psychology,
Market, Customer,
theory Probability Society
Supplier, Product,
distribution Service, Process,
Criteria, Activity
How it works Population: Target all the interested
Targets to be approached
Test, Estimate theory Random sampling:
Speculate, Test, Same components,
Estimate extract by accuracy
Reality; present, future Gap Ideal image, demand Good society: Wealth,
economic growth,
Problem awareness, improvement,
Analyze and understand Conscious of innovation
advanced welfare
the current situation Problem, Task Grasp needs, insight, pursuit
Acknowledge the difference Technical aspect Understanding, stating, formulation,
Social aspect
and relationship modeling of a problem
Cause Possibility Learn from others: benchmarking
Phenomenon, occurrence
investigation seeking
mechanism
Concept, target angle, scenario
Analysis, hypothesis, Ideas, Originality
examination Countermeasure alternative plan Simulation, practicability
Eliminate cause, avoid
Evaluation, Choice Prototype, User-led
negative effect
Implementation of the countermeasure
Break of an effect, Confirming of the effect Systematize, firm establishment,
standardization, Learning, maintenance
Realization of the improvement and
lateral spread evolution. Sense of achievement
183
Essential Requirement in Problem Solving
Activities for Getting Successful Results
184
Recognition in critical situation for organizational existence
185
Figure 4. Causal Model for the Effective Problem Solving Activity
Recognition in Critical Situation;
Social Value of the Organization Sharing Value and Fact (Problem)