Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nigel Marsh
Chief Pipe Stress Analysis Engineer
Worley Parsons Australia
© Intergraph 2014
Fatigue Analysis in ASME B31.3 Piping
Content
ASME B31.3
Typical Fatigue – Offshore Oil and Gas
Fatigue approach using pressure vessel code
Fatigue evaluation example
© Intergraph 2014
ASME B31.3
Stresses Types
Sustained
Occasional
Displacement stress range
At fittings and discontinuities SIF’s increase stresses for weld system
© Intergraph 2014
ASME B31.3
© Intergraph 2014
Typical Fatigue – Offshore Oil & Gas
© Intergraph 2014
Typical Fatigue – Offshore Oil & Gas
Bridge piping
Platforms can move relative to each other
Bridge pinned one end, sliding other
Piping must absorb relative movement
Variable amplitude high cycle fatigue
Thermal expansion low cycle fatigue
© Intergraph 2014
Typical Fatigue – Offshore Oil & Gas
FPSO’s
Ship hull motion and acceleration causes high cycle fatigue loading in
piping
Many permutations of the different motions and accelerations
Variable amplitude high cycle fatigue
Thermal expansion low cycle fatigue
© Intergraph 2014
Fatigue approach using pressure
vessel code
© Intergraph 2014
Fatigue approach using pressure
vessel code
© Intergraph 2014
Pressure vessel codes
© Intergraph 2014
CAESAR II fatigue load case
© Intergraph 2014
CAESAR II fatigue load case
© Intergraph 2014
EN13445
© Intergraph 2014
EN13445
Classification of weld
details for supports
© Intergraph 2014
EN13445
© Intergraph 2014
EN13445
© Intergraph 2014
EN13445
Correction factors
Deviations from design shape (Ovality, weld misalignment)
Material thickness (typically > 25 mm)
Temperature
Corrosion
NDT
Elastic / plastic behaviour
© Intergraph 2014
EN13445
© Intergraph 2014
EN13445
© Intergraph 2014
EN13445
© Intergraph 2014
Cumulative Fatigue Damage
© Intergraph 2014
Fatigue Evaluation Example
© Intergraph 2014
Bridge Piping Example
Loadings
Thermal expansion; -10° to 100°C, 1560 cycles
Relative platform movement; 100 year return period storm, movements
in various directions
© Intergraph 2014
Bridge Piping Example
CAESAR II model
Temperature T3 -10°, T2 100°C
Displacements D1 North/South ±350mm, D2 East/West ±700mm
Apply displacements to support CNodes
Consider nonlinear aspects of model, include friction, exclude
guide gaps
© Intergraph 2014
Bridge Piping Example
CAESAR II model
North
Fixed point
in model
© Intergraph 2014
Bridge Piping Example
© Intergraph 2014
Bridge Piping Example
4 (OPE) W+D1+T1+P1
5 (OPE) W-D1+T1+P1
6 (OPE) W+D2+T1+P1
7 (OPE) W-D2+T1+P1
8 (SUS) W+P1
9 (EXP) L9=L2-L3
© Intergraph 2014
CAESAR II output reports
© Intergraph 2014
CAESAR II output reports
© Intergraph 2014
Bridge Piping Example
© Intergraph 2014
Bridge Piping Example
CAESAR II results
© Intergraph 2014
© Intergraph 2014
Bridge Piping Example
© Intergraph 2014
Summary
© Intergraph 2014
Fatigue Analysis in ASME B31.3 Piping
Thank You
Nigel Marsh
Chief Pipe Stress Analysis Engineer
Worley Parsons Australia
© Intergraph 2014