Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PREPARED BY :
KANMANI A/P PALAMALAI (823542)
KAVITHA A/P KUPUSAMY (823543)
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATING ITEM, TEST AND
MEASUREMENT
Distractor
https://languagetestitemanalysis.weebly.com/content/distractor-analysis
1. Item Difficulty Index
p-value
• Occasionally everyone knows the answer
c) Excellent teaching
a) Motivation level
p = ? 0.88
p= 18 = .60
30
The item was moderately difficult.
• Record information
Example for item X
(Class size = 30)
Options A B C* D
Upper 1 0 11 3
Lower 2 0 7 6
p = total who answered correctly D= Number correct (upper) – Number correct (lower)
total taking the test Number in either group
p= 5 = .18 D= 4– 1 = .214
28 14
Positive discrimination
It is a difficult item
18% of the class got it right.
Distractor C and D attracted more students who did well on the test overall.
These distractors modified agood item will be made even better.
Example for Item z
(class size = 30)
Options A B* C D
Upper 3 4 3 5
Lower 0 10 2 3
p = total who answered correctly D= Number correct (upper) – Number correct (lower)
total taking the test Number in either group
Negatively discrimination
It is a moderately difficult.
47% of the class got it right.
Shoul be eliminated.
MISKEYING
Students who did well will select an option that is a distractor
rather than the option.
Exp:
Who was the first astronaut to set foot on the moon?
A. John Glenn
B. Scott Carpenter
C. Neil Amstrong
D. Alan Sheppard
Analyzing the response
A B C D*
Upper half 1 1 9 2
Most students in the upper half of the class fail to select the keyed
option.
GUESSING
AMBIGUITY