Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prof. E. E. Ricote
ASPAP Inc.
Situational Backgrounder
(Policy Context)
• Policymaking process (agenda-setting-formulation-formalization- adoption-
implementation) formalized in institutions with policy making mandate (legislative
branch)
Policy Adoption Republic Act 10354 (2012) – Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health
Policy Act
Formalization While there was general agreement about its provisions on maternal and child care, there
remains a huge debate about its mandate that the state and private sector will fund and
undertake widespread distribution of family planning devices, birth control pills and IUDs
and government continues to disseminate information on their use in health centers
Policy Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) has yet to be developed
Implementation Funding allocation has yet to be mobilized through DOH and other agencies with
specific roles – FDA, LGUs, etc.
Family planning and responsible parenthood component to be integrated in anti
poverty programs (Chapter 12)
Policy Evaluation A petition questioning the constitutionality of the RH Law was raised to the Supreme Court
which voted, in March 2013, to issue a status quo ante order halting its implementation
Profiling the Public Policies (3)
Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM) Policy
Policy Cycle
Policy Formulation Drew urgency from old law’s (P.D. 1566) disaster management policy focused only
around the hazard and the impacts of a disaster. It assumed that disasters cannot be
avoided. Most of the plans were on the provision of relief goods and infrastructure.
The DRRM Act came as a response to increasing risk of disasters in the face of
intensified global climate change.
Policy Adoption Republic Act 10121 – DRRM Act Amending previous policies and
Policy providing a comprehensive DRRM Program. The DRRM Act adopts and
Formalization adheres to principles & strategies consistent with the international standards set by
the Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA), a comprehensive, action‐oriented
response to international concern on disaster impact on individuals, communities &
national development.
Policy Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) – Focus on integrated priorities for
Implementation action towards disaster risk reduction – a) disaster preparedness; b) risk
assessment; c) vulnerability reduction; d) knowledge management and, e) governance
Inter-agency National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council
(NDRRMC) with defined roles for government agencies, local governments, civil
society, private sector and the affected local communities
Policy Evaluation Evaluation of policies, processes and institutional roles reiterated in the light of recent
disasters that highlighted readiness and coordination challenges between national and local
governments
Profiling the Public Policies (4)
Kapit Bisig Laban sa Kahirapan- Comprehensive Integrated
Delivery of Social Services (KALAHI-CIDSS)
Policy Cycle
Policy Formulation Framed from the National Anti-Poverty Program (Social Reform Act)
Consolidated the lessons and strategies of the two poverty reduction programs –
CIDSS (DSWD) and Kecamatan Development Program (Indonesia)
Policy Adoption Social Reform and Poverty Alleviation Act (RA 8125 - 1998)
Policy Embodied in Philippine Development Plan (PDP 2011-2016) and NAPC’s community
Formalization driven development (CDD) thrust .
Scaling up of the CDD through the Human Development and Poverty
Reduction Cluster - NAPC, DAR, DA, DepEd, DOE, DILG, DOLE, etc.
Policy First Phase (KC-1) 2003-2010 – 42 poorest provinces (over 50% nationwide)
Implementation assisted in small scale but responsive to community-identified needs (e.g.
school buildings, health stations, day-care centers, post-harvest facilities, etc)
By end of 2010, the project funded partially by WB has covered a total of 5,543
barangays (villages) in 200 municipalities
Millennium Challenge Account Phil (MCA-Phil) funded KC-II (Aug 2011)
and benefited 160 municipalities in 24 provinces, as 2,672 subprojects completed
including 249 school buildings, 198 water systems, 117 day-care centers, 99 health
stations, 45 flood and river control systems
Policy Evaluation Consolidation of lessons and challenges (c/o DSWD) particularly on the role of local
governments - towards policy, process and implementation improvements
Case Study - Conditional Cash Transfer
Guidelines (Pantawid Pamilya Program)
Policy Cycle
Policy Formulation Evolved from the social development objective of breaking the inter-generational
poverty cycle through investments (health, education) in human capital;
Inspired and adopted from other developing countries’ cash transfer schemes to
selected beneficiaries provided they comply with program conditions
Expected to help fulfill Phil’s MDG Goals – 1) Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger;
2) Achieve universal primary education; 3) Promote gender equality; 4) Reduce child
mortality; 5) Improve maternal health
Policy Adoption Executive Order 221 (2003) - Redirected the functions and operations of the
DSWD to provide assistance to LGUs, NGOs, Pos, etc. effectively implementing
Policy
services to reduce poverty; empower poor individuals/families/communities
Formalization
Administrative Order 15 (2008) – Guidelines on the Implementation of a Pantawid
Pamilya Program (Conditional Cash Transfer Program)
Policy Program Coverage – 79 provinces covering 1,484 municipalities and 143 key cities in
Implementation all 17 regions nationwide
Program Cycle – 1) selection of target beneficiaries; 2) supply side assessment; 3)
selection of households; 4) registration and validation; 5) family registry preparation
6) initial payment; 7) verification of compliance; 8) 2nd and succeeding releases
Program Package – Ph6,000 a year or Ph500 per household for health and nutrition
expenses; Ph3,000 a school year (10 months) or PhP300/month/child for educational
expenses; maximum of 3 children per household
Case Study - Conditional Cash Transfer
Guidelines (Pantawid Pamilya Program)
Policy Cycle CHALLENGES ENCOUNTERED
Reproductive Health Proper policy context and content that include Social and economic considerations (i.e. quality of family
Law social dimensions of reproduction that made the life, health and nutrition, women’s health, children
law take its appropriate social relevance and welfare, etc) appropriately captured in all phases of the
urgency policy process and dialogue
Creative approaches to drive and articulate policy Reproductive health’s direct correlation with economic
objectives productivity prudent use of public sector resources
KALAHI-CIDDS Simplification of processes and procedures Participation by the entire community, including formal
The community driven development (CDD) and traditional leaders, representatives of different
approach facilitated people empowerment sectors, individuals, groups, and local organizations
The sense of ownership among the participants Participation of women and indigenous people and
and stakeholders encouraged by the CDD approach broadening the base of participation prevents elite
built up a renewed sense of accountability in them capture of project activities and benefits.
Disaster Risk Clarity in the delineation of roles and tasks by Participation by all state and non-state actors both at the
Reduction and various national and local institutions national and local levels
Management Utilization of ICT-based methodologies/approaches Direct correlation between disaster reduction,
Program (DRRM) Primacy of public communications (i.e. traditional rehabilitation and management and productivity,
and social media) as a tool employment, resource generation and sustainable
development
The Conditional Creative consolidation of health/nutrition, Direct benefit to education, health/nutrition targets
Cash Transfer education and productivity-inducing interventions Generation of productive activities that bring about
Program into one program employment, access to opportunities and resources
Customization of similar best practice and
Lessons and Recommendations
• Innovation can be institutionalized into the policy process.
Diligence in the development and processing of policy inputs is crucial
www.aspap.org