Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prof. U. P. Singh
Department of Agronomy,
Institute of Agricultural Sciences,
B.H.U. Varanasi, U.P. (India)
Challenges for Food Security
Exploding population – little control / No control
Harvested area shrinking (?)- crop intensification
Greater competition for land, labor and water-
good land diverted to other sectors
Increasing production costs
Climate change more apparent – terminal heat,
rusts etc.
Resource fatigue - Reducing factor productivity,
land degradation
‘One size fits all’ approach and untrained
extension staff.
Issues Realized And Solutions
Issues Solution
Poor land leveling Precise leveling of lands
Water shortages GW development, save water,
reduce evaporation, weed
control
Poor quality seed Use of quality seeds
Weed infestation Integrated weed management
Chemical
Soil Quality
Soil
Organic
Matter
Physical Biological
Soil Quality Soil Quality
Conservation
Agriculture
enhances
biological
tillage
instead of
mechanical
tillage
Resource Conserving Technologies (RCTs)
Conventional RCTs
1. No-tillage
5. Crop diversification
Resource conservation technologies in rice-
wheat systems
Tillage
Transplanting Direct-drill-seeding
Crop
establishment
CA based RCTs options for System
sustainability
Zero tillage
Paired row ZT
Control traffic ZT
Direct seeding
Unpuddled transplanting
Reduced tillage
Bed planting
Surface seeding
Zero Tillage – A cost effective and input
use efficient technology
Advantages of Zero Tillage
• Reduced costs (Rs 2000-
2500/ha) due to savings in fuel
and labor
• Timely planting of kharif and
winter season crops, resulting
in higher yields
• Lower density of herbicide
resistance in comparison to
traditional tillage.
• Significant irrigation water
savings (up to 15-20%)
• Improved input use efficiency
because of the right placement
of seed and fertilizer nutrients
Zero Till (ZT) –Wheat Seeding
• Better plant stands
• Less burning of crop resides
Permanent FIRB (Residue managed)
Wheat Mungbean
Wheat Rice
Rotavator : An emerging issues
Increased seed rate (160 kg/ha)
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
15 Nov
22 Nov
29Nov
5 Dec
2002-03
12 Dec
19 Dec
15 Nov
22 Nov
29Nov
5 Dec
2003-04
12 Dec
19 Dec
15 Nov
22 Nov
29Nov
5 Dec
2004-05
12 Dec
19 Dec
15 Nov
22 Nov
29Nov
5 Dec
2005-06
12 Dec
19 Dec
15 Nov
22 Nov
Conservation Agriculture
29Nov
5 Dec
2006-07
12 Dec
19 Dec
15 Nov
22 Nov
29Nov
in CA and CT systems in eastern U. P.
5 Dec
2007-08
22 Nov
29Nov
5 Dec
2008-09
12 Dec
19 Dec
15 Nov
22 Nov
Wheat yield (t ha-1) under different seeding dates during 2002-03 to 2009-10
29Nov
5 Dec
2009-10
12 Dec
19 Dec
Organic C (%) 0.8
0.7
No-tillage is a win-
0.6 Tilled win technology
No till
0.5
Wheat 2002-03
Wheat 2003-04
Wheat 2004-05
Wheat 2005-06
Initial 2002
Rice 2003
Rice 2005
Rice 2007
Helps early sowing
Saves water, labor and diesel
Increases fertilizer use efficiency
Reduced soil erosion
Improves soil organic C
No-till wheat is more tolerant to abrupt
temperature rise: Climate change adaptation
Zero-tillage
Cost (input)
1. Seed 27 24
2. Tillage 61 29
3. Fertilizer 67 64
4. Irrigation 19 14
5. Labour 40 36
6. Herbicide/pesticide 24. 30
7. Harvesting & threshing
49 48
Farmer
152 3.0 b 44 a 375 b
Practice
Fresh Bed
17 4.4 a 38 a 628 a
Planted
ZT-Planted 222 3.5 ab 0b 512 a
Means within a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different at the 0.05 level
Wheat Productivity (t/ha) as influenced by CA
based permanent bed planting and CT in Rice-
Wheat system
6
3 PEB-W
CT
2
0
2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Suggested work plan for cluster demonstrations
wheat during Rabi season 2011-12 in Eastern U.P