Farmer Heder crisis has been one of the critical issue threating the security and national development in Nigeria. this presentation articulates the different dimensions of the conflict including an understanding of the perceived and real threats of the conflict. The presentation presents a case study of how this conflict was tackled in Gombe State Nigeria through the development of robust structures.
Farmer Heder crisis has been one of the critical issue threating the security and national development in Nigeria. this presentation articulates the different dimensions of the conflict including an understanding of the perceived and real threats of the conflict. The presentation presents a case study of how this conflict was tackled in Gombe State Nigeria through the development of robust structures.
Farmer Heder crisis has been one of the critical issue threating the security and national development in Nigeria. this presentation articulates the different dimensions of the conflict including an understanding of the perceived and real threats of the conflict. The presentation presents a case study of how this conflict was tackled in Gombe State Nigeria through the development of robust structures.
AS THE TOOL FOR PROMOTING COOPERATION AND CO-EXISTENCE CP AUSTIN IWAR CP BAYELSA STATE COMMAND Presentation Format Introduction Perceived threats Real threats Understanding Community Policing Distinguishing features of Community Policing Gombe Experience in handling Farmer-herder crisis Recommendations to Government of Gombe State Building Structures, Systems, and Process Renewed Community Policing Activities Introduction – Problematic reality Crisis between farmers and herders has been on for several years The crises springs from the demand for land for farming & grazing, & results in frictions between farmers & herders as they both explore land for its resources for their agricultural needs. clashes have resulted in needless destruction of lives & properties with long-term direct impact on the socio-economic wellbeing of affected areas with another indirect consequence on those depending on affected persons/areas for their agricultural needs. the economic fortune of the States becomes affected as revenue that would have been generated become not forthcoming & additional resources are spent in restoring peace. Indeed the exact total of socio-economic loss of such clashes can never be accurately quantified. Introduction Of factors attributed to these migrations, the most obvious being the intensification of drought and desertification, & climate change leading to unregulated migrations. This means herders reach farming areas when they are least expected, during farming and harvesting season. Although the migration of herders has created strong social & economic bonds between many communities, it has also caused serious conflicts, the history of which is always fresh in our collective memory. Three types of conflicts. Conflicts caused by international migration of herders; conflicts caused by intensification of transnational migrations among Chad, Niger, Nigeria & Cameroun; conflicts caused by recent migration & settlement of herders in some states. Perceived threats Loss of Farmland: Farmers are predominantly scared of the possibility of losing their farmlands to herders whom they suspect are out to deprive them of the right and use of their means of livelihood. This fear gives birth to hostilities. Loss of Grazing Land: In like manner, herders exhibit perceived fears of losing their grazing lands to farmers who they accuse of constantly expanding their territories. In resistance to this fear, conflicts emerge. Destruction of Crops: Farmers exhibit high levels of perceived fear of losing their farm produce from activities of herdsmen & thereby resulting in hostilities. Loss of Livestock: While farmers live in perceived fear of losing their farm produce, herder equally exhibit high levels of fear of losing their livestock to rustling and hostilities by non-herders. Perceived threats Theft of Crops/Livestock: Farmers & herders both live in the perceived fear of theft & destruction of their crops/livestock & in order to prevent it from happening, they embark on all manner of measures. Perceived Laws/Regulations Specifically Targeted at them: Farmers & herders alike perceive certain laws/regulations as threats to their livelihood and exhibit defiance and or hostilities to protect their interests. Insensitivity of Authorities: Farmers & herders perceive certain government policies & neglect as deliberate insensitivity to their plight & in response put up resistance and hostilities. Real threats Ignorance of Laws & Regulations on Transhumance: ignorance of the applicable laws & regulations in agriculture is one of the real threat to peaceful coexistence between farmers and herders. Weak & poor Law Enforcement: threat to lasting peace in farmers/herders crisis lies in existence of laws/regulations are either outdated or less effective. Thus, enforcement is weak & thereby allowing misbehavior & conflict. Mutual Suspicion: Farmers & herdsmen have lived in mutual suspicion of each other perpetually with open distrust of one another. This is largely responsible for failed attempts to bring them together on one table for fruitful discussions & lasting solution to the lingering crisis. \ Inadequate Government Support/Intervention: inadequate support/intervention of the Government, such as incentives, subsidy, marking of farming/grazing reserves, etc. to enable them ply their trade. Real threats Shrinking Arable Land: real threat to cooperation & peaceful coexistence between farmers & herders is the increasing dwindling availability of arable land for farming & grazing in the midst of explosion in its demand. This includes climate change & desertification. Blurring of Migration Routes: Both internal & transnational routes; sometimes grazing areas that have been marked are lost & cannot be identified or not maintained by authorities; Expansion of Communities: The expansion of areas cultivated by farmers; expansion families & communities necessitate the need for more farm lands; Increased Cattle Herd: An increase in cattle herds, which has deepened the competition for scarce natural resources; sometimes herders encroach on private farm lands, away from designated grazing areas destroying crops; Real threats Politicization of Conflict: threat to cooperation & peaceful coexistence between farmers & herders lies in the deliberate politicization of the crisis where some persons chose to give it political definition. Bias in Handling Crisis: Farmers, herders & other stakeholders have blamed the aged long farmers-herders crisis on injustice occasioned by bias handling of the crisis by relevant authorities resulting in renewed tensions. Perpetrators Escape Punishment: threat to peaceful cooperation & coexistence between farmers & herders in hinged on the fact that perpetrators often times go unpunished and thereby giving birth to a new circle of crisis. Real threats Leadership Corruption and Greed: diversion/misappropriation of resources meant for providing enabling environment for farmers & herders to ply their trades in peace with one another. An example is the deliberate diversion of funds budgeted for creating migration camps, demarcation of farming & grazing areas as well as resources meant for rehabilitation of crisis affected areas. Regulation of Agric sector: whilst there are regulations for pastoralists, we yet to regulate other sectors of agriculture; e.g. there is a national livestock transformation plan but crop farming transformation plan. Land use Act: Poor implementation of land use act. Understanding Community Policing We have reached a situation where something has to be done by all parties involved – herders, farmers, Government officials and security agencies. The conflicts are multi-faceted. Farmers want the land for agriculture; business people want the land for investments; herders want to graze their animals. Our communities have been devastated & become hopeless areas to live. Our ability to prevent these crimes will depend heavily on our ability to help reshape community life, at least in most of the communities we are experiencing farmer-herder crises. Unfortunately for us, the number of communities affected are not only increasing, but their problems are so profound. Community Policing Approach focuses on crime & social disorder through the delivery of police services that includes aspects of traditional law enforcement, as well as prevention, problem solving, community engagement, & partnerships. It requires police & citizens to join together as partners in the course of both identifying & effectively addressing these issues. Community Policing as a proactive strategy offers a much more holistic approach to dealing with farmer-herder conflicts. Basic elements include: Service Delivery, Partnership, Problem Solving, Empowerment, Accountability Distinguishing Features of Community Policing role of the police officer extends beyond law enforcement officer involved solely in crime control. The police are called upon to enforce the law, to prevent crime, promote public order, resolve conflict, enhance police-community relations, and render general service and assistance to the public; A police officer therefore requires wide ranging skills; Community policing moves away from the incident-driven style of traditional policing by following a more problem-oriented approach. Creative police responses to the underlying causes of problems are also introduced. Police are no longer restricted to law enforcement or visible patrolling. A variety of strategies and tactics are introduced in order to prevent and combat crime. Community policing accepts that the police cannot solve crime & disorder problems on their own. All are considered equal partners that work together to make communities safer places to live, work & raise children; Distinguishing Features of Community Policing Community consultation & partnerships should develop so that they enhance the ability of the police to combat & prevent crime. In this way also, the communities will be able to monitor, evaluate & advise the police. Community policing necessitates development & change in the traditional structure & culture of police services. One of the biggest changes relates to the empowerment of employees. This is facilitated when decision-making, innovation, & creativity are encouraged at all levels of the police organisation. Gombe State Experience The risk factors mentioned here were found to exist & persist in Gombe state prior to my being posted to the state in 2015. All these created massive security problems leading to destructions of farmlands, properties, cattle & deaths running into billions of naira; Most of these conflicts were based on competition for grazing lands, water & farmers encroaching on gazette grazing areas & stock routes. The migration of these herdsmen into Gombe state usually leads to violence, killings and mass destruction of villages, & inhabitants fleeing their homes & constituting internally displaced persons. In 2015 the state experienced destruction of communities in Yamaltu-Deba Local Government. One of such conflicts led to the shooting & wounding of a police officer that was deployed to maintain peace. Gombe State Experience While all these conflicts & clashes were occurring, findings showed that Gombe state was rich & heavily endowed with massive agricultural & pastoral economy. In Gombe state pastoralism generates considerable wealth & economic interdependence between herdsmen & farmers. With around 1.2 million head of cattle, 1.9 million sheep and 2.6 million goats, pastoralism contributes a huge percentage to the state’s gross domestic product (GDP), & also contributes to the livelihoods of a large percentage of the population. the traditional pastoral farming system in Gombe State contributes significantly to socio-economic development & the growth of livestock in the state and the country. Gombe State Experience The state also has seven (7) gazetted grazing reserves across five local government areas – Akko (2), Billiri, Dukku, Kwami, and Yamaltu-Deba (2). In addition, there are 34 proposed, surveyed community grazing areas across ten (10) local government areas. Nine (9) of the grazing areas were heavily or partially encroached. This created problems for the government & the police. It is a crime to encroach on gazetted grazing reserves. Those found guilty were arrested and charged to court. Mapping of all migration routes and pastoralists settlement areas; Mapping of areas of prevalent areas clashes. Recommendations To the Government Although the state has a Ministry for Animal Husbandry & Nomadic Affairs, the Nomadic Affairs Department saddled with responsibility of tackling herders problems was weak. the Police made some far-reaching recommendations to the Government that were to be implemented by the Ministry & other security agencies as measures to prevent farmer-herder clashes. These included: Government to compile comprehensive data on livestock in the State showing their locations, population, movement & specific needs to aid accurate planning; Government to immediately appoint Reserve Rangers that will take care of cattle routes, grazing reserves, grazing ponds, monitoring & policing of these aspects. The Ranger will amongst other things be responsible for: Recommendations To the Government Anticipate migrations to prevent violence related to herders in the state; Work with appointed staff from the Animal Husbandry and Nomadic Affairs, in partnership with representatives of herders (Miyette Allah etc.) on transhumance routes to monitor itinerary & inform in advance local authorities that herders are passing through the state; Ensuring that marked transhumance routes are not encroached by farmers,& cattle resting areas are maintained in order to slow down migration through the state; Recommendations To the Government The immediate appointment of Reserve Settlement Officers in accordance with Grazing Reserves Law CAP 62 LFN 1965 that will be responsible for the preservation, granting of access, census of herders and their herds accommodated amongst others. The Ministry of Animal Husbandry and Nomadic Affairs should work with herders & farmers to mark transhumance routes & monitoring of seasonal movements. Government to ensure that all grazing areas & ponds have the full complement of veterinary clinics to attend to herds as they converge, The Government should evolve means of adopting modern farming & grazing techniques to reduce conflicts, Recommendations To the Government The Government to consider urgently the establishment of a Committee or Commission made up of representatives of all stakeholders charged with responsibilities of preventing conflicts & resolving any that may arise & specifically the following: Government (Ministry of Agriculture/Animal Resources) should regulate, enforce laws, empower conflict resolution committees to do their work, etc. Miyetti Allah Cattle Breeders Association of Nigeria (MACBAN) should educate their members on the need to avoid conflicts by staying away from farms & farm produce, taking the law into their own hands, etc. Farmers’ Association should educate members to avoid encroaching on stock routes, adopt modern farming techniques that produce high yields in short time, harvest their produce within good time, etc Police & other security agencies will be responsible for ensuring that there is security and safety in these areas. Recommendations To the Government Community leaders and relevant authorities should enlighten their subjects on the need to avoid actions that will breach the peace. Farmers, pastoralists and indeed persons who deliberately cause conflicts through their actions or inactions should be made to face the full weight of the laws. The Ministry of Animal Husbandry & Nomadic Affairs should generate data on indigenous herds & their sizes to allow for easy notice of immigrants. Government to ensure that provisions of the Grazing Reserves Law CAP 62 LFN1965 are implemented by the Ministry of Animal Husbandry & Nomadic Affairs, Government to ensure that the provision of the ECOWAS Decision A/DEC.5/10/98 Relating to Regulation on Transhumance are implemented by the Ministry of Animal Husbandry and Nomadic Affairs. Recommendations To the Government Relevant Government agency should adequately mark the suitability of the grazing reserves & ensure that they are ecologically conducive for livestock & acceptable to herders. Relevant Government agency should unblock or create new cattle routes, Dams and cattle resting points. Government should work with Local Governments to carry out surveys of all farmlands in the state and provide titles to them. This will help define each farm or community hectares and thus reduce encroachment; Government should complete the survey & gazette of proposed community grazing reserves; Adequate deployment of health services along transhumance routes, and in every big cattle market; Recommendations To the Government Ministry to monitor livestock migration to improve knowledge (itinerary, size of herds, concentration areas etc.); Government to empower standing crisis response or conflict management committee or team to facilitate dialogue between government, traditional rulers, farmers, pastoralists and resolve disputes in accordance with the ECOWAS Decision A/DEC.5/10/98 Relating to Regulation on Transhumance. Security agencies should collaborate with relevant stakeholders and increase their patrols and surveillance on grazing reserves, transhumance routs, farm areas, etc. to prevent crimes. Building Structures, Systems and Processes The place to start is to look at the structures, systems and processes in place to tackle these problems. A new Director for Nomadic Affairs was appointed to work with the Police Commissioner to design the broad operational systems and processes. Other structures developed include: Deputy Director – Grazing Reserve and Settlement Scheme: Amongst other responsibilities include – range reseeding of grass and legumes; conduct range surveys, range mapping, range inventory and planning; multiplication of grasses and legumes seeds as fodder for livestock; plan, design and establish range development; Building Structures, Systems and Processes Deputy Director – Stock Route and Water Development: stock water development for livestock watering points, small dams; maintenance of existing boreholes, concrete wells and earth dams, identification, retracing, demarcation, documentation and surveying of stock routes etc., Deputy Director – Nomadic Affairs: establishment of development programmes related to grazing reserve such as , nomadic schools, markets, veterinary clinics, dispensaries; provision of extension services in grazing reserves to the nomads through workshops and seminars; resolving conflicts in the grazing reserve and stock routes between farmers and herders etc.; Building Structures, Systems and Processes Assistant Director – Grazing Reserve Assistant Director – Settlement Scheme Assistant Director - Water Development Assistant Director – Stock Route Assistant Director – Nomadic Welfare Assistant Director – Conflict resolution Renewed Community Policing activities Renewed Community Policing Activities With these structures on ground we embarked on a number of activities predicated on community policing principles and aimed at reducing the conflicts. These included: Community Engagement activities: The police in collaboration with the Ministry facilitated several community engagement sessions with leaderships of nomads and farmers aimed at developing strategies to tackle problems and prevent anticipated conflicts. Community Policing as a strategy promotes mutual understanding and respect through town hall meetings where all stakeholders contribute to security and safety of the community. Renewed Community Policing activities Security and safety Sensitization and Awareness: Through Community Policing, stakeholders in farmers/herders crisis were exposed to security and safety sensitization and awareness on how to avoid issues capable of breaching the peace and how to prevent crimes in the community. Migrating herders were constantly sensitised to start migration after harvest season, while farmers were encouraged to harvest their crops as soon as possible. Ownership of Solution: Our community Policing intervention gave stakeholders a sense of ownership of solutions to problems and therefore improved commitment and sacrifice to make it work. Renewed Community Policing activities Census Of Local Herdsmen/Farmers To Fish Out Any Foreign Intruders: Community Policing helps farmers and herders to better acquaint with one another and thereby enabling them to easily and immediately notice foreign intruders in their midst which will reduce conflicts between them. Setting up of Empowered Conflict Resolution Committee: Conflict Resolution Committees existing in local Government areas were strengthened. Under Community Policing, farmers/herders crisis are better prevented and resolved through standing committees made- up of representatives of all sides setup to serve as arbiter/respondent to conflicts. Renewed Community Policing activities Joint Livestock/Farm Patrols: Joint patrol teams was set up making up of all security agencies, government officials and representatives of farmers and herders organisations. Community Policing partnerships approach to resolving farmers/herders crisis will create joint efforts such as patrols and surveillance to prevent crisis and promote peaceful cooperation and coexistence. Renewed Community Policing activities Community policing can be a veritable tool for promoting cooperation and co-existence amongst farmers and herd= and thus reduce and in future eliminate crisis and violent conflicts that has bedevilled this country for some time. The Gombe state experience facilitated and driven by the Police Command in Gombe is a classic example of how this can be achieved. With the right governance structures in both Police, communities and government department, the state witnessed massive improvements in relationship between farmers and herders. Renewed Community Policing activities The effectiveness in community policing is in the fact that it mobilises community against crime and criminality by using the resources available to the police and the community. In addition, it goes to the root cause of crime and disorder in partnership with the community and other agencies through problem solving. It therefore activates the community as a source of assistance and information for the police. In Gombe, we were able to deal with farmer-herder crisis through effective consultation and partnership with all stakeholders, improve delivery of police services to the Gombe people, promote joint problem identification and solving and ensured much more accountability and transparency. The End Community policing is both a philosophy and organizational strategy to more effectively achieve the objectives of democratic policing Community Policing focuses on crime & social disorder through the delivery of police services that includes aspects of traditional law enforcement, as well as prevention, problem solving, community engagement, & partnerships.
The Community Policing model balances reactive responses to
calls for service with proactive problem-solving centered on the causes of crime and disorder. Community Policing requires police & citizens to join together as partners in the course of both identifying & effectively addressing these issues. Characteristics of Community Policing Policing is Essentially Proactive The underlying causes of crime, incidents & public complaints are analyzed & identified; Rather than simply reacting to the incidence of crime, anti- social behavior & other sources of public complaint, the police adopt a systematic & integrated problem-solving approach with a view to reducing & preventing the such incidents; Perception & actuality are treated with equal seriousness (e.g. the ‘fear of crime’; public perception of police integrity & competence); All police personnel & departments are involved in the problem-solving process, contributing ideas & designing initiatives for more effective policing Policing involves Community Consultation, Cooperation and Interdependency The police participate with the public at large in identifying & prioritizing community needs; The police and community work in partnership to devise & implement agreed solutions to problems; The community actively engages in the policing role through volunteer schemes, initiating neighbourhood support networks & augmenting police patrol activities. Policing involves Multi-Agency Collaboration The Police recognize that no statutory (or voluntary) body can make a meaningful impact on social problems if it acts in isolation; The police liaise & work together with other statutory agencies & voluntary organizations in addressing crime & other disturbances to public tranquility. Policing is Accountable Police managers are open & accountable about policies, strategies, operations & decisions affecting the community; All police personnel are accountable for their professional & personal standards & for their treatment of citizens; Policing effectiveness is monitored, evaluated & open to scrutiny; Citizens with a grievance against the police have a means of redress. Policing is both Visible and Accessible patrol officers are assigned permanently to small areas or zones (usually called ‘beats’) with delegated responsibility for policing that area; High visibility patrols are conducted, ordinarily on foot, to interact with the public, gain the confidence & cooperation of citizens, & develop local knowledge; The aim of patrol activity is to be preventive & provide public reassurance; Patrolling must be directed & focused on clear objectives, not aimless and undirected; The demeanour of patrol officers is such that citizens will feel able to seek police assistance. Policing is about Providing Quality of Service Standards of service delivery are measured; Testing objectives are set for operational performance & public satisfaction; The police develop a culture of service excellence. Community Policing Principles and Values The NPF Community Policing Model is based upon the following key principles and values: Relies upon active partnership between the police and the community; Ensures the police view their primary role as the provision of quality service to the community. Entails that the police adopt a problem-solving approach to their work; Requires that the Police involve the community in deciding policing priorities Community policing embraces the following values Respect for and protection of human rights; Transparency and openness in relation to activities and relationships within and outside the police organization; Demonstrable commitment at all times to deliver the best possible service; Empowerment of all police personnel to make appropriate decisions and thereby facilitate a speedy delivery of quality service; Willingness to seek for, listen to and act upon public opinion relating to policing priorities; Accountability, where the police are properly answerable for what they do, and citizens with a genuine sense of grievance against the police have an effective means of redress; Ensure that citizens with a grievance against the police have effective communication channels and redress. Summary of Key Principles: Be visible & accessible to the public; Know, & be known by, the public; Engage, mobilize & partner with communities; Listen to communities’ concerns; Respond to communities’ needs; Respect & protect the rights of all community members; & Be accountable for their actions & the outcome of those actions. Benefits of Community Policing Community-specific benefits the mobilisation & empowerment of communities to identify & respond to concerns; a reduction in problems & issues of concern as they are prioritised & addressed; an improved local, physical & social environment; an increase in positive community attitudes towards police; active participation of the community in crime prevention; and reduced fear of crime. Police-specific benefits an improved police-community relationship; CHANGING OUR ATTITUDES & BEHAVIOURS SO THAT WE CAN DELIVER A BETTER SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC an improved community perception of police 'legitimacy'; INCREASING PUBLIC TRUST, CONFIDENCE & SATISFACTION IN POLICE PERFORMANCE an increase in officer satisfaction with their work. IMPROVING CAPACITY OF POLICE TO DELIVER REQUIRED SERVICES CREATING A CULTURE OF SERVICE EXCELLENCE Community support for supplementing or obtaining more police resources; Shared benefits a decreased potential for police-citizen conflict; a reduction in crime rates; a better flow of information between the police & the community, and; better implementation of crime prevention & crime control activities, as a result of both parties working together towards shared goals. Better appreciation of the constraints & problems facing the police Prioritization of services & the more appropriate allocation of available resources Design /Implementation Process US Govt. efforts in Kaduna: training over 200 constables as community policing officers & given bicycles to engage with communities & do problem solving; 2003 - DFID (SJG) & MacArthur Foundation efforts - facilitation of a study tour to UK & US to understudy community policing; Development of COP project team with mandate: To facilitate the development of community policing throughout Nigeria; and To examine the policies, strategies, structures & organization of the Nigeria Police, to ensure that the applicable principles & core values of community policing are enshrined in the professional performance, ethics & codes of conduct of the Nigeria Police. Development of COP Implementation elements: 1. Manage & deliver awareness, sensitization & information sharing campaign on community policing; 2. Implement community policing training for officers in the States; 3. Examine & develop current organizational structures to drive community policing; 4. Examine & develop the current training & development function; 5. Develop an intelligence-led policing style, including new technology and science; and 6. Examine laws, police processes & procedures. COP further reinforced by Govt. white paper on Presidential Committee on Police Reform 2008 Recommendation 5.26 (i-iv): (i) “There is need to adapt community policing to suit Nigeria’s peculiarities. Government should formulate a Community Policing Policy and Framework for the country, taking into account our cultural and political environment” (ii) ‘all police officers should undergo training in the basic philosophy and practice of community policing”. (iii) The principle of community policing should be included in the curricular of all police training institutions” (iv) “The police should establish effective police-community linkages from the lowest to the highest levels to ensure the implementation of crime prevention strategies and policing priorities of the various communities”. Success Factors of first phase: Community policing works; development of partnership btw. the police & communities helped to strengthen understanding & support for crime & community safety; work in pilot sites witnessed substantial improvements in police – community relationship; The piloting of Community Safety Partnership in Gwagwalada in the FCT informed the process of developing a national strategy for crime prevention & community safety, by providing appropriate methodologies & grass-roots structures drawn from the communities; In areas piloted, service delivery improved; partnership working increased due to increased trust, confidence & communication between the police & communities; Joint problem-solving activities took place & security issues became everybody’s business & not just the police; Improved management capacity for DPOs who were the main change agents to manage change – improved leadership & ownership of the reform agenda; Various training & development workshops for stakeholders proved the importance of problem solving capacity of stakeholders; sensitization workshops changed attitudes & behaviour of personnel; involvement of community leaders in the implementation of community policing, the identification of local problems & joint problem solving contributed significantly to local ownership & support; establishment of the Department of Community Policing in the Ministry of Police Affairs further strengthened government commitment to the programme; the role of civil society participation showed the critical & central role they can play & the value of much broader engagement; Challenges of first phase: The lack of a national policy or legislation institutionalising community policing as a philosophy of policing remains critical to police reform & development; Many police officers did not see community policing as a policing philosophy & strategy but more as an add-on to police work; institutional resistance; Lack of organizational restructuring to institutionalize community policing; no operational tools, policies, guidelines, new processes & procedures; non-democratic structuring of local governance; entrenched law enforcement structures Police divisions as primary implementers – have weak structures & poor definition of roles & resps.; partnership unsustainable implementation focused on some strategic aspects of community policing, neglecting the philosophical aspects; The successes in community were mostly based on individual interest & commitment rather than organizational commitment; The Way Forward The need for organizational change – key to institutionalising community policing – to be led by IGP & Management; For community policing to be institutionalised key changes MUST take place – structural, cultural, strategic & management style changes; IGP to set up teams to evaluate the entire police structures to be aligned with COP; A programme on workforce modernisation to be initiated; FHQ has to set the standard guidelines, policies & frameworks for all aspects of community policing The bulk of work done by J4A programme to be institutionalised & replicated to all police stations; The NPF Integrated Intelligence Model earlier developed & approved by a former IGP need to be implemented; The need to situate CPs, DPOs as change agents at the State Command level; both to be given performance targets; CPs to be trained in change management; DPOs to be trained in divisional management within the context of community policing; CPDs to perform the role of training, sensitization & awareness of police personnel; Establishment of a robust performance management system at FHQ; END