You are on page 1of 17

Methods for Deconstructing and

Reconstructing Community in Virtual


Learning Environments
Richard A. Schwier
Ben K. Daniel
Virtual Community Research Laboratory
University of Saskatchewan

Based on: Schwier, R.A., & Daniel, B.K. (2007). Did we become a community?
Multiple methods for identifying community and its constituent elements in formal
online learning environments. In N. Lambropoulos, & P. Zaphiris (Eds.), User-
evaluation and online communities (pp. 29-53). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.

  IST Conference | Indiana


  University | March 2007
Central Concerns
• Focus of research
• Atomized view of communities
• Generation of models
• Using research to inform online
learning environments

  IST Conference | Indiana


  University | March 2007
Community

Modeling Constituents

Comparison

  IST Conference | Indiana


  University | March 2007
  IST Conference | Indiana
  University | March 2007
Sense of Community
• Chavis’ “Sense of Community Index”
• Rovai & Jordan’s “Classroom
Community Scale” (Chronbach’s alpha = .93)
– Connectedness (.92)
– Learning (.87)

• Pre-post design (t-Test, p<.005)

  IST Conference | Indiana


  University | March 2007
Interaction Analysis
• Fahy, Crawford & Ally (TAT)
• Intensity
– “levels of participation," or the degree to which
the number of postings observed in a group
exceed the number of required postings

– 858 actual/490 required = 1.75

  IST Conference | Indiana


  University | March 2007
Interaction analysis
• Density
– Included only peripheral interactions
– the ratio of the actual number of
connections observed, to the total potential
number of possible connections

2a/N(N-1) = 2(122)/13(12) = .78

  IST Conference | Indiana


  University | March 2007
Reciprocity ratio
the parity of communication among participants

  IST Conference | Indiana


  University | March 2007
Plotting
Reciprocity

  IST Conference | Indiana


  University | March 2007
Characteristics of Community
• Transcript analysis
• Interviews
• Focus groups

  IST Conference | Indiana


  University | March 2007
Characteristics
• Awareness • Participation
• Social protocols • Trust
• Historicity • Future orientation
• Identity • Technology
• Mutuality • Learning
• Plurality • Reflection
• Autonomy • Intensity

  IST Conference | Indiana


  University | March 2007
Comparison of characteristics
• Thurstone analysis

  IST Conference | Indiana


  University | March 2007
Thurstone Scale
Modeling
Bayesian Belief Network Model of a
Virtual Learning Community

  IST Conference | Indiana


  University | March 2007
BBN - Query the network

  IST Conference | Indiana


  University | March 2007
BBN - Query the network

  IST Conference | Indiana


  University | March 2007
Conclusions
• Cycle of analysis is more important than
specific tools used
• Mixed methods seems reasonable, and
worked well in practice
• Baseline data is needed to situate findings
• Modeling is an act of systematic speculation
influenced by data (not limited by data)

  IST Conference | Indiana


  University | March 2007

You might also like