Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Recommendation
Colgate prices grossly underperformed in 2018 FIIs, Banks and Insurance Cos Net Seller
• India’s FMCG industry grew at 12% in FY18 Rural FMCG Market (US$ billion) Urban – Rural Industry Breakup
(FY2017-18)
250
• Rural Markets are the key growth Drivers
Expected CAGR 28% in
200
• 45% revenue share in FY2018 Rural FMCG Market
150
• 72% market penetration vs. 95% in urban US$ 52.75 45%
55% billion
markets 100
• Sensitive to prices 50
in FY18
Toothpaste
45,000 18,000
Segments
36,007 35,802 35,916
35,000 14,000
30,000 12,000
10,051
9,689
25,000 10,000
8,854
7,682
20,000 8,000
• Herbal, Whitening, Freshness, 5,820 6,057
6,636
explosive growth since 2014 5,000 3,051 3,212 3,240 3,337 3,275 3,307 3,020 3,303 3,334
3,352 3,499 3,491 3,603
3,834 3,808
2,000
Herbal Sensitive
Dabur controlling the segment (66%) High margin segment
Patanjali driving growth (CAGR 63.6%) Sensodyne controls the market and is growing
share (70%)
Consistent loss of market share in the Colgate’s market share has been dented by herbal
toothpaste segment indicates Colgate’s brands such as Patanjali and Dabur
poor innovation pipeline compared to peers 70
56.1 57.0 57.4 55.6
6.5% 60 52.7 54.5 53.7
7.4%
50
40
15.4%
30 23.3 23.5 22.8
53.4% 21.3 19.6 19.1 17.6
20
17.3% 14.8 14 13.4 13.4 13.9 15.3 15.5
10
6.7
as of Mar‘18 0.6 1.3 2.8
0 0.0 0.1 0.4
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Colgate HUL Dabur Patanjali Ayurved Others HUL Dabur Patanjali Colgate
Cibaca and Swarna Vedshakti are the indigenous Cibaca priced at a 9% premium to Dant Kranti
brands in the ayurvedic segment Swarna Vedshakti cheapest in the premium segment
100.0 90.0
90.0
Prices in Rs/100Gms
80.0
70.0 62.5
60.0 55.0
50.0
50.0 43.8 46.0
40.0
40.0
30.0
20.0
10.0
0.0
Patanjali Colgate Dabur Dabur Colgate Lever Patanjali
Dant Cibaca Red Meswak Swarna Ayush Dant
Kranti Vedshakti Vedshakti Anti Kranti
cavity Advance
clove oil
However, none of the brands were launched pan-India
(Cibaca is largely North-India focused and SWARNA VEDSHAKTI is South-India focused)
Source: Colgate’s Investor Presentation and Analyst Reports
Colgate’s Strategy in 2013 – Oral-B
Colgate’s PAT margin decreased to 14% in FY15 Colgate’s marketing expenses increased by 40%
from 16.6% in FY12 y/y in 2014
6,000 17.0% 45.0% 40.4%
16.6%
16.5% 40.0%
5,000
15.7% 16.0% 35.0%
4,000 15.5% 30.0%
15.1%
15.0% 25.0%
3,000 17.8% 19.2%
14.5% 20.0%
2,000 14.0% 15.0% 19.2%
14.0% 15.5% 17.0%
13.5% 10.0% 15.3%
1,000 3.8%
13.0% 5.0%
- 12.5% 0.0%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2012 2013 2014 2015
PAT (INRmn) PAT margin (%) Advertising exp. (% of sales) Advertising growth (%)
Colgate responded by increasing it’s media spend at the cost of profitability to retain market share
PAT margin increased to 18% in 1QFY19 from 13.8% Increase in profitability was however through
in 1QFY18 curtailed media spending
Innovation
Innovation driven trend
• High scale media deployment Brand Naturals
Commu-
Source: Research Report • WiMi and CCBTs strategies nication Strategy
Diversified Competitors
SELL
Conclusion Target Price : Rs 1,035
Q&A
Annexure : DCF Analysis for Colgate Palmolive