You are on page 1of 14

WELCOME

Campaign-06 On KPI & KPA for the


Month of Sep'2018

Thermax Power O&M 1


A Short Guide to Leading and
Lagging Indicators of Safety
Performance

Does your facility have an


effective safety culture? Is
safety truly a priority?

Thermax
Thermax Power
Power O&M
O&M 2
Basic concepts before starting the KPI & KPA

What is Leading Indicators & Lagging Indicators

Thermax Power O&M 3


One way to improve the effectiveness of your safety process is to change the way it
is measured.

Measurement is an important part of any management process and forms the basis
for continuous improvement. Measuring safety performance is no different and
effectively doing so will compound the success of your improvement efforts.

Finding the perfect measure of safety is a difficult task. What you want is to measure
both the bottom-line results of safety as well as how well your facility Finding the
perfect measure of safety is a difficult task. What you want is to measure both the
bottom-line results of safety as well as how well your facility is doing at preventing
accidents and incidents. To do this, you will use a combination of lagging and leading
indicators of safety performance.

Thermax
Thermax Power
Power O&M
O&M 4
Lagging indicators of safety performance

What is a lagging indicator?

Lagging indicators measure a company’s incidents in the form of past


accident statistics.
Examples include:
1. Injury frequency and severity
2. OSHA recordable injuries
3. Lost workdays
4. Worker’s compensation costs

Why use lagging indicators?


Lagging indicators are the traditional safety metrics used to indicate
progress toward compliance with safety rules. These are the bottom-
line numbers that evaluate the overall effectiveness of safety at your
facility. They tell you how many people got hurt and how badly.

Thermax Power O&M 5


The drawbacks of lagging indicators.

The major drawback to only using lagging indicators of safety


performance is that they tell you how many people got hurt and
how badly, but not how well your company is doing at preventing
incidents and accidents.

The reactionary nature of lagging indicators makes them a


poor gauge of prevention. For example, when managers see
a low injury rate, they may become complacent and put
safety on the bottom of their to-do list, when in fact, there are
numerous risk factors present in the workplace that will
contribute to future injuries.

Thermax
Thermax Power
Power O&M
O&M 6
Leading indicators of safety performance

What is a leading indicator?

A leading indicator is a measure preceding or indicating a


future event used to drive and measure activities carried out to
prevent and control injury.

Examples include:

•Safety training
•Ergonomic opportunities identified and corrected
•Reduction of MSD risk factors
•Employee perception surveys
•Safety audits

Thermax Power O&M 7


Why use leading indicators?

Leading indicators are focused on future safety performance and


continuous improvement. These measures are proactive in nature and
report what employees are doing on a regular basis to prevent injuries.

Thermax
Thermax Power
Power O&M
O&M 8
Best practices for using leading indicators

Companies dedicated to safety excellence are shifting their focus to


using leading indicators to drive continuous improvement. Lagging
indicators measure failure; leading indicators measure performance,
and that’s what we’re after!

According to workplace safety thought leading indicators


should:
Allow you to see small improvements in performance
Measure the positive: what people are doing versus failing to do
Enable frequent feedback to all stakeholders
Be credible to performers
Be predictive
Increase constructive problem solving around safety
Make it clear what needs to be done to get better
Track Impact versus Intention

Thermax Power O&M 9


Conclusion

Lagging indicators measure failure; leading


indicators measure performance, and that’s
what we’re after!

Thermax Power O&M 10


Classroom Training conducted on KPI/KPA

Training Attendance sheet on KPI/KPA.

Thermax Power O&M 11


Classroom Training conducted on KPI/KPA

Training on the KPI/KPA


Snapshot .

Thermax Power O&M 12


Test marks score by the employees out of 10 .

Site Name - Tata Metaliks LTD

Total marks
Sr. No. Name of Participants Training date (Competency Marks obtain
mapping)
1 Indrajit Kumar Dey 10 8
2 Utpal Bhattacharya 10 7
3 Sudhir W elke 10 6
4 Prasenjit Mandal 10 6
5 Dipak Ghorai 10 7
6 Amrish Tiwari 10
7 Arnab Maji 10 6
8 Suman Chakraborty 10 8
9 Ajay Kumar Singh 10 6
10 Shyamal Mondal 10 6
11 Deoshankar Bharve 10 5
12 Anirban Ganguly 10 6
13 Shouvik Sahoo 10 8
14 Alok Kumar Roy 10 7
15 Saroj Satapathy 10 8
16 Rajkumar Sen 10 8
17 Mohit Kumar 10 8

20/09/2018 to 27/09/2018
18 Sudansu Das 10
19 Amitava Jana 10 7
20 Debasis Adhikary 10 5
21 Pralay Ghosal 10
22 Pranab Kumar Ghosal 10 6
23 Arun Ghosh 10 6
24 Anandarup Das 10 5
25 Debasish Panda 10 5
26 Shantanu Sahoo 10 6
27 Susobhan Kumar Pan 10 8
28 Tarun Kumar Nayak 10 7
29 Mintu Ghosh 10 6
30 Satyajit Ghorai 10 3
31 Pannalal Jana 10 5
32 Tapas Paul 10
33 Biplab Jana 10
34 Supradip Poria 10
35 Pratik Maji 10
36 Mahadev Das 10 3
37 Mrinmay Hatai 10
38 Samir Samanta 10 8
39 Sourav Dandapat 10 7
40 Prasanta Kumar Dakua 10
41 Apu Bera 10 6
42 Arindam Bag 10
43 Narayan Bera 10 5
44 Abhijit Kuity 10
45 Biswajit Ghosh 10
46 Totan Maity 10 4
47 Subhasish Saha 10
Thermax Power O&M 13
Thermax
Thermax Power
Power O&M
O&M 14

You might also like