Professional Documents
Culture Documents
dr.Lenny Arinda FH
Purpose of review
ICP monitoring and treatment is central in the management TBI
Indications for ICP and treatment options still controversial
Recent findings
Decompression tested for ICP refractory to conventional treatment
reduced mortality, but more disability.
Hypothermia as an alternative to conventional medical therapy.
stopped because of a worse outcome
Summary
Aggressive strategies for ICP control, surgical decompression or hypothermia,
have controversial effects on outcome.
INTRODUCTION
ICP monitoring & therapy are based more on consolidated clinical
experience than scientific evidence.
Decompression
markedly reduced mortality (22% more survivors)
more patients remained in a vegetative state or with severe disability
SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION cont...
DECRA trial
Only patients with diffuse injury
Randomized after a cumulative time of 15min, ICP >20mmHg
no outcome improvement due to decompression
similar mortality in the two groups
2. Intraventricular/Subdural Catheter.
Data collection is wireless, excluding the system from any direct external
connection
Any given ICP value, for instance 25mmHg, has a quite different
meaning if recorded without therapy or during maximal
treatment.
This observation led to the ‘therapy intensity level’ (TIL) concept.
CONCLUSION
Despite conflicting evidence, ICP monitoring is still a cornerstone in treating
TBI
Helping to reduce mortality, even though not influence the outcome.
To improve the ICP cost–benefit ratio in everyday practice studies have been
published
Noninvasive approaches to ICP measurement still has a long way to go.