• When two or more mutually exclusive alternatives are
ME-291 Engineering Economy
evaluated, engineering economy can identify the one that is the best economically. The PW and AW can be used for this purpose. ROR can also be used for the selection of the best alternative. • Let us assume that a company uses a MARR of 16% per year, that the company has $90,000 available for investment and that two alternatives A and B are being evaluated. • Alternative A requires an investment of $50,000 and has an internal rate of return i* of 35% per year. Alternative B requires $85,000 and i* of 29% per year. • The first decision may be to select alternative A because it has higher rate of return. However, it is not necessarily so.
requires an initial investment that is much less than the total money available. The remaining investment or the excess funds will be investmed at the company's MARR. • Using this assumption it is possible to determine the best alternative. • If A is selected, $50,000 will return 35% per year. The $40,000 left over will be invested at the MARR of 16% per year. The rate of return on the total capital available, then, will be the weighted average.
Overall RORA = (50,000(0.35) + 40,000(0.16))/90,000 RORA = 26.6% Overall RORB = (85,000(0.29) + 5000(0.16))/90,000 RORB = 28.3% So it shows that even though the i* for the alternative A is higher, alternative B presents the better overall ROR for the $90,000. if either a PW or AW comparison is conducted using the MARR of 16% per year as i, alternative B will be chosen.
Calculation for the Incremental Cash Flows for ROR analysis
• It is necessary to prepare an incremental cash flow
ME-291 Engineering Economy
tabulation between two alternatives in preparation for an incremental ROR analysis. • The format is shown in figure. • If the alternatives are of equal lives, the year column will go from 0 to n. if the alternatives have unequal lives, the year column will go from 0 to the LCM of the two lives.
initial investment as alternative B. • When LCM of lives is used, the salvage value and reinvestment in each alternative are shown at appropriate times.
the extra investment or cost required if the alternative with the larger first cost is selected. • If the rate of return available through the incremental cash flows equals or exceeds the MARR, the alternative associated with the extra investment should be selected. • Incremental method is used only for the revenue alternatives, because service alternatives have only cost cash flows and no i* can be determined.
internal rate of return i* for each alternative. • Eliminate all alternatives that have an i* < MARR. • Compare the remaining alternatives incrementally.