Phone Tapping On Corruption Suspect

Arya Yoedha T • 1102018246

Corruption History in Indonesia
• Came as a “legacy” from Dutch VOC
Corruption in Indonesia
• Corruption is becoming more popular
predominantly on government employees
Some Bad Effect
• Increase of unemployed people
• Increase of poverty
• Moral decline
• Slow down development
• Loss of public trust
The Solution
• Established on
2002
• Main Office in
Jakarta
• Has been
investigating 1,098
cases since 2004
• Based on Undang-
Undang Nomor 30
Tahun 2002
Agus Raharjo
KPK Chairman, 2015-2019 period
Phone Tapping
• Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Republik Indonesia
Nomor 5 Tahun 2010 Paragraph 9 to Paragraph
12
• Pasal 12 Ayat 1 Huruf a UU Tahun 2002
• UU no 32 Tahun 2002
Controversies on phone tapping
• Privacy invasion
• Validity
• Special committee for inquiry rights
“Made Up” Controversy
• Corruption cases are lex specialis’
• Doesn’t have strong evidence
• Significantly increase the success
rate of KPK investigation
• The surveys*
• Proven**
Surveys*
Does the special committee weaken What is the actual use of the special
the KPK? committee inquiry rights?
5.50%

29.50%

Agree Protect fellow colleagues

43.80%
Disagree 51.60% Contrary
Did not answer Did not answer

65%
4.60%
Survey*
Trusted Government Agency
TNI
90.40% 89% 87.80% KPK
79.60% POLRI
76.40% 75.80%
72.60% 71.90% 70.90% BPK
68.70%
65% MK
MA
Juridicial
Law court
MPR
DPD
DPR
Proves**
• Akil Mochtar Case
• Luthfi Hasan Ishaaq case
• Fuad Amin case
• Etc.
The

CONCLUSION
 ANY
QUESTION(S)?