Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Properties taken
1. Density of masonry = 20kN/m3
2. Weight on roofs = 2kN/m2
3. β = .22
Commentary
• Index 1 and Index 2 are independent of the design ground acceleration
• These indexes should be larger with increasing seismicity, assuming buildings to have identical
safety
• For indexes 1 and 2, the seismicity is taken into account by multiplying the threshold by
the seismicity coefficient a according to the zones A, B, C and D, respectively equal to 1.0, 0.7,
0.5 and 0.3.
• Index 3 should be constant in different seismic zones, as it considers the effect of seismicity
Results
1. Index 1 indicates a unexpected variation for the churches, because the average values exhibit
minor differences according to the seismicity contrarily to the expected dependency (A > B >
C > D).
2. Four churches (16%) in zone A and three churches (27%) in zone B, violate the adopted
criterion.
3. Not a single building violates the criterion of Index 2 and seems to indicate that the threshold
needs revision and is in conflict with Index 1.
4. Index c3, as a direct result from the constant values of indexes 1 and 2, exhibits increasing
values with decreasing seismicity.
5. On average, Index is on the verge of violation for the adopted criterion of zone A, but
adequate for the other zones. Individually, seventeen churches (68%) in zone A and one
church (9%) in zone B, violate the adopted criterion.
Interpretation of results
1. Index 1 is independent from the height, which is considered a major drawback. Therefore, only
Indexes 2 and 3 are further analyzed.
2. The comparison between Index 2 and Index 3 is equivalent to compare (1/h) and (1/b), or
height and seismicity, if cohesion is ignored.
3. Equivalent heights of the churches in the seismic zones are calculated by h equiv = G/ (Aw × γ)
4. With this equivalent heights, the threshold values of Index 2 is recalculated for zones A, B, C,
D as shown in the following table.
6. Considering the above clause, 9 churches of the 22 churches in the previous run and 58 of the
original churches are deemed to be unsafe and needs further study.
7. The threshold value of Index 3 also needs further revision, as 20 of the last 22 churches violate
the minimum criterion of safety.
2. Uncertainty quantification in structural health monitoring : Applications on
cultural heritage buildings
• SHM : A knowledge based
Utility of monitoring system installed
assessment tool to quantify and
in CH:
reduce uncertainties regarding
structural performance
• Validation of adopted structural
models
• Alternative to intrusive repair work
•Identify progressive damage
•Validation of effectiveness of
• Cultural heritage sites –important
strengthening techniques
cultural and economic asset
•Replacement if required, of
strengthening techniques to allow
• Italy – characterized by high
continuous control of response
seismicity
Fig. 9b represents
the identified poles
after the cleaning
process of the
stabilization
diagram
Frequencies estimated
for 30 days and their
95% confidence level is
displayed. The estimates
are in general accurate
but they vary from one
record to another
Results
Based on the initial dynamic identification, the variations of the fundamental natural frequencies of the Arena's Wing
extracted from the measured vibrations. The frequency development vs. time and vs. temperature gives a sound indication on
the dynamic characteristics of the structure and it is strongly related to the environmental parameters
Summarizes the results of the application of the automated subroutine for the identification of the vibration modes of the
structure during the monitoring period (05/12/2011–30/07/2014).
Results
• The standard deviation of natural frequencies show that environmental conditions have a strong
influence, especially for modes 2–7
• Regarding the estimation of modal damping coefficients, the results show higher dispersions.
However, reasonable mean damping values were calculated.
• All structural modes, apart from mode 4, present, on average, damping coefficients around 1%: this
value is certainly underestimated, given that masonry structures are usually characterized by higher
damping ratios in the range of 4–7%.
• It is worth noting that mode 4 is characterized by a higher damping coefficient, confirming that
dissipation mechanisms occur mainly where such mode shape present the maximum bending, i.e. just in
correspondence of the anchorage of post-tensioned steel cables inserted along the massive pillars of the
wing during the strengthening intervention of 1956 .
• In general as light trend of decrement of all natural frequencies is noted with the approach of the hot
season, demonstrating the correlation between variation of natural frequencies and environmental
parameters.
Case Study 2
• The Sala dei Battuti Hall -The Conegliano Statistical modeling of environmental
Cathedral – a masterpiece of the Renaissance effects
building
• Once the environmental effects are filtered
• Frescoes of the Battuti Hall are subject to serious out from recorded data, it is possible to
cracking accurately decompose the measurements
into their reversible and irreversible
• Differential settlements between the facade of the components
cathedral and the surrounding structures, namely the
massive bell-tower – leads to cracking • In this case ARX model used - an Auto-
Regressive output (randomness) and an
Monitoring Systems exogenous input (independent)
• Preliminarily a correlation analysis
• A network of displacement transducers + a
performed with the objective of identifying
temperature / relative humidity sensor – significant
the time series of environmental parameters
cracks
presenting higher correlation coefficients
• A contactless structural damage control method with the time series containing the measured
with high definition optical camera - to control the output (i.e. crack opening).
behaviour of the more visible lesion in the frescos
• Correlation between T and H
• The equipment detects the relative displacement and y given in the table:
of four small optical targets placed on the two
sides of the crack and applied by means of a T-H y- T y- H
special glue, completely removable, that does not r -.8038 -.9409 .776
damage the painted surface
Statistical model of environmental parameters
• The selection of the ARX model ( orders of the exogenous input (na), autoregressive output (nb) and
the delays between input and output (nk)) based on quality criteria proposed by Peeters & De Roeck:
loss function(V), the final prediction error (FPE) and the coefficient of determination (r2) given by:
• Once the best ARX model is obtained from the first half-year of monitoring (estimation phase), new
measured environmental parameters (fresh data), collected during the second half-year (validation
period), are used to simulate the response of the studied crack
• From the comparison between the simulated crack behaviour and its recorded counterparts, changes
caused by structural damage can be distinguished from those caused by varying environmental
conditions.
• The Fig. shows the temporal evolution of the
displacement of the frescos crack during a
period of 13 months before and after the
elimination of the environmental effects
performed through the described dynamic
regression models.
• For the static data case, a new contactless technique was presented for the frescoes monitoring,
revealing a good correlation with standard measurements.
• Modal parameter identification via advanced cluster analyses integrated into system identification
techniques was developed.
• Due to the analysis with different combinations of the model order (n) and the number of rows of the
output block matrices (i), most of noisy modes are eliminated.
• The new procedure, based on cluster analysis and statistical data treatment, proves to be very effective
in the identification of the structural modes. The reliability of the algorithm has been demonstrated on
dynamic data recorded not only from the slender and flexible wing of the Arena but also from the
massive and rigid amphitheatre, difficult to excite uniformly.
• The uncertainty on the modal parameters varies from one record to another, and variability during the
long-term monitoring process is taken into account with mean values and confidence intervals.
• Finally the outcomes of almost three years monitoring are presented, exploiting the developed
automated SHM algorithms running on the central server of university where data are continuously
transmitted and processed on arrival
• Autoregressive models were successfully implemented to filter out the environmental effects from
static records. Damage detection algorithms were applied and confidence intervals calculated around the
predicted values to distinguish changes caused by structural damage from those induced by varying
environmental conditions.
3. Probabilistic reliability assessment of a heritage structure under horizontal
loads
• Methodology for probabilistic reliability assessment of heritage buildings – a historical aqueduct
• Survey of the aqueduct demonstrate that when out-of-plane rotation of pillars > 6 degree, cracks so
significant that temporary structures required to support it.
• Objective - To assess the reliability of the structure under horizontal load , w.r.t the inclination of
the pillars, considering Bayesian updating of the wind speed.
• Computation of • Verification of
• Identification – structural reliability
• Definition of the probability of failure
ultimate and
limit state (1- pf) > (1- pd)
serviceability limits
underlying the pf= P[G<0]=P[Z<1] β > βt
– failure modes –
theory of reliability where target
basic variables to
On the basis of the reliability is
govern the failure E<R;
reliability index β represented by
mode G = R-E=0 ;
Z = R/E=1 ; (1- pd)/ βt
β = Φ-1(pf)
• Definition of the • Bayesian approach
where E = action, R
probability density - defining
= resistance (both where Φ-1 is the
function fi(Xi) for probabilistic models
random variables) standard normal
basic variable Xi for existing building
G = safety factor; Z cumulative
that govern the as the nature of
= safety margin. distribution function
limit state information obtained
.
being indirect.
Methodology of planning tests and inspections on historic structures (ISO13822)
Global model and analysis, local
model
• Structural analyses to reveal static and
dynamic properties, stress patterns and
state of damage.
• Original design and dimensioning
replicated in the analysis model for
better understanding of the defects
• Ad hoc models + Numerical models
• Study of local mechanisms for safety
evaluation due to poor connections
between components
• Stabilizing horizontal force is a function of the displacement of the central arch from mean position .
• A kinematic analysis has been performed on the same macro element, considering as a possible collapse
mechanism :the rigid rotation of the structure around a cylindrical hinge located at the pillar’s base.
• The element has been evaluated both in the vertical and inclined position, also considering the presence of a
stabilizing force transmitted by the adjacent elements.
The results of the FORM analysis are shown. The highest reliability
index is obtained when α ≈ 1.7°, when the stabilizing force assumes
the maximum value V ≈ 80.4 kN. For α > 1.7°, the stabilizing force
decreases, and thus the reliability of the structure. Results reveal that
Extreme values of wind speed follows Gumbel the structure is not safe any more for α > 6.5°
distribution – updating of the distribution is
done according to annual wind speed
observations collected at Pisa.
The target reliability index βt= 3.7 The reliability of the element assessed considering the seismic
force and the Ultimate Limit State (ULS). For α < 3° the
structure can be considered safe.
Conclusions
• In the deterministic analysis carried out in SAP2000, it was seen that the structural
element can be considered safe when it stands in a vertical position, while it is near to
collapse for an inclination of 9°; the limit inclination at which the structure can withstand
seismic action is assessed around 4°.
• The opinion of historical buildings‘ experts fulfils a special role in the proposed
methodology, not only for establishing prior probability models and identifying most
relevant failure modes, but also in order to confirm the obtained results.