ANDY PRABOWO1,2

1Consulting Structural Engineer, Royal HaskoningDHV Indonesia

2Adjunct Lecturer, Civil Engineering Department Tarumanagara University

BALI, 1-2 AGUSTUS 2016 1

 INTRODUCTION

DESIGN
CONCLUDING
APPROACH &
REMARKS
METHOD
OUTLINE

RESULTS AND CASE STUDY &

DISCUSSIONS DESCRIPTIONS

2
 Urbanization  Vertical Hybrid Steel-
space demand  extension Concrete
while limited as possible Frames 
green field Code?
option
INTRODUCTION

Reference figures: http://www.steelconstruction.info/Braced_frames 3

 vertical extension = additional story(ies)

Commonly used but resistant

to the earthquake?

Nonlinear
behaviour?
Reference figures: http://www.steelconstruction.info/Braced_frames 4
Approach  design as usual but respect to code
detailing requirements

Fundamental Period, Ta = Ct.hnx

Use RC Frames parameters

Seismic Performance Factor? (SDC: D)

R = 6, Cd = 5 (Prabowo & Lase, 2016)

Strong column weak beam  Not

applicable in transition storey
5
6
 CASE
STUDIES

SDC D

Variation RC Frames Steel

Frames
S1 5 storeys 1 storey
S2 4 storeys 2 storeys
S3 3 storeys 3 storeys 7
 Dynamic Behaviour

Fig. 1. Interstory Drift Hybrid MRF 8

 Pushover Curve - Code

 The result from different code

are almost similar at peak value
 Uniform > Modal pattern
9
 Pushover Curve
(Variation modelling)

Vy
Y > X y Ke
t Vt

10
 uniform

modal

Unsatisfactory performance created

by uniform load pattern  difficult
to get the ultimate displacements
around the target displacements

11
 Model S3

STEP 6
STEP 5

12
Model S3

END STEP
13
 Model S2
STEP 5
STEP 5

14
Model S2

END STEP
15
 Model S1
STEP 6
STEP 6

16
Model S1

END STEP
17
 Concluding Remarks
• The approach of design method achieves Life
Safety level  comply with standard
• All variations produce overstrength factor () 
structure posses ductile performance.
• Configuration of steel – RC frames derives
dynamic behavior and nonlinear behavior
• As RC frames less dominant in hybrid MRF will
decrease a hybrid performance system.
• Modal load pattern will be apropiate for
evaluation rather than uniform load pattern
18
 Recommendation
• Nonlinear time history analysis could be the next
step
• Further study on the steel frame behavior by
considering detail modelling in all the joints
• Further investigation to develop more
sophisticated design method

19
20