Mahakali River • India exchanged 4000 acres of land for 2898 acres of land of Nepal • Maintenance, Operation, Protection of Sarada Barrage • At Banbasa (Uttar Pradesh) • Provisions 14,000 cusecs of water to India and 1000 cusecs of water to Nepal • Tanakpur Treaty in 1991 • Severe criticism within Nepal • Built a weir part away across the river • Mahakali flowed away from the weir took away 33 acres of Nepal land • 1000 cusecs capacity head regulator at Tanakpur • 150 cusecs of water to irrigate border side of both India and Nepal • Between 4000-5000 ha of land on Nepalese side irrigation • India 10 MW of energy at a special cost to Nepal despite the loss of power supply from the Tanakpur Power Station • Tanakpur Power Station Major Obstacle between two countries • No Cooperative engagement • As Constitution was promulgated on 9th November 1990 in Nepal, Article 126 deemed it necessary for a parliamentary ratification by two-thirds • India’s controlling interest over the major rivers for economic reasons • Tanakpur Agreement remained undisclosed to the Nepali public • Not produced in the Parliament in the pretext that it was only an ‘understanding’ not a treaty. • Severe criticism from all quarters of Nepal. • Media inform the people of the pros and cons of the Tanakpur project • Koirala and his party Nepali Congress faced still opposition from the opposition. • Scathing attack to the Tanakpur agreement from street to houses. • Rostrum of lower house was gheraod (encircled) for eight hours by the UML on 28 February 1991. • Supreme Court decided that the Tanakpur agreement waas indeed a treaty and not just an understanding • Required Parliamentary ratification • To ratify the tanakpur agreement by simple or special majority was left to the Parliament. • A Commission was headed by Lok Raj Baral • Six point Criteria to analyse • Commission concluded that Tanakpur agreement was ‘ all encompassing serious and long term nature’ and recommended to ratify with a simple majority • Nepali Congress, Rastriya Prajatantra Party, and Sadbhawana coalition government • Visit of Indian PM , Foreign Minister and Water Resources Minister • Clarify the uncertainities and realities of Tanakpur treaty. • Mahakali Treaty signed in February 1996. • New prospects of harnessing the Himalayan Rivers for hydropower, irrigation and flood control • Valid for 72 years, reviewed every 10 years • Principle of equitable and reasonable use. • Replaces earlier understanding on Sarada Barrage, Tanakpur Barrage and the proposed Pancheshwar Project. • 1000 cusecs in the wet season and 150 cusecs in the lean season. • If Sarada becomes non-functioning minimum flow of 350 cusescs downstream to preserve river ecosystem • Joint operation of the head regulators and waterways. • 70 million KW of energy on a continuous basis anually • Free of Cost • 132 KV transmission line up to Nepal-India border from Tanakpur Power Station • Tanakpur Power Station 120 MW capacity, generates 448.4 million KW of energy • Provision for incremental energy to Nepal against payment. • Prime Consideration for Nepal’s water requirements and irrigation. • Approved by 2/3 of the majority of the Parliament of Nepal. • Equitable distribution of water • Nepali politicians digruntled over range of real and perceived reasons