Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ON
SKILL DEVELOPMENT AND HANDS ON
DISADVANTAGES :-
1. Relatively area requirements for advanced treatments.
2. Current imprecise design and operating criteria
3. Biological and hydrological complexity and our lack of important process
dynamics.
4. Possible problems with pests.
5. Steep topography, shallow soils and high water tables, susceptibility to severe
flooding may limit the use of constructed wetlands.
RESULTS :-
DISCUSSIONS :-
The results show the concentrations of five
parameters for wastewater treated by conventional
treatment plant, root zone system and simple filter
bed system. It is clear that the use of Reed bed
system is best for the treatment of all parameters
when compared to the other two. There is a
remarkable reduction in pH, B.O.D, C.O.D by Reed
bed treatment and the treated water has become fit
enough to be let out directly into a receiving water
body as the concentrations are below allowable
limits. Thus the root zone treatment can be used
independently or as an addition to conventional
treatment so as to make the final output fit
enough for discharge into a natural water body.
Sample Before and After treatment
CONCLUSION:-
It has been observed that reed beds system for treatment of wastewater
using the floating plant system is a predominant method which is
economic to construct requires little maintenance and increase the
biodiversity. The removal efficiency of contaminants like TSS, TDS,
BOD, COD, EC, hardness, heavy metals, etc varies from plant to plant.
Plant growth rate and hydraulic retention time can influence the
reduction of contaminants. Therefore, an available knowledge and
techniques for removal of water contaminants and advances in waste
water treatment can be integrated to assess and control water pollution.
REFERENCES
1. American Public Health Association., (1992), Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and wastewater, 18th. Ed. APHA Publication, Washington
D.C.
2. Babbit. H. E., and E. R. Baumann., (1960),. Sewage and sewage Treatment, Asia
Publishing House., Bombay, 8th. Ed.
3. Bhide. W.D., (1982), Disposal and Utilization of Urban sewage for irrigation –
Cost benefit, IAWPC Tech, A (9), pp 7–15.
4. Bouchard. R., (1995), Using constructed wetland pond system to treat agricultural
runoff: A watershed perspective, Lake Reservoir Management, 1(1), pp 29-36.
5. CPCB. (2000), Guidelines on construction, operation and application of root zone
treatment system for treatment of municipal and industrial wastewater, New
Delhi.
6. Crites. R.W., (1994), Design Criteria and practices for constructed wetlands,
Water science and Technology, 29 (4), pp 1-6.
7. Bansari M. Ribadiya Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Applications
ISSN :2248-9622, Vol. 4, Issue 12( Part 3), December 2014, pp.15-18