Pradhan Mantri Awaas

Yojana - Gramin
Meeting with Principal Secretaries / Secretaries
22nd April, 2017
 PMAY-G

PRC – January 2017 Slide No. 2

Points of Discussion PMAY-G

1 PMAY-G – Target, State Share

2 Performance under PMAY-G

3 Mason Training

4 House Design Typologies

Meeting with States Slide No. 3

 1 Annual PMAY-G Physical Target

Year Target (nos.)

2016-17 44,00,000

2017-18 33,00,000

2018-19 23,00,000

Total 1,00,00,000

Meeting with States Slide No. 4

 1 Annual Financial Implication

Central State Share

Total cost
Year Target Share (63% (37% of total
@ 1.25 lakh
of total cost) cost)

1 2 3 4 5

FY Nos. In Crores In Crores In Crores

2016 - 17 20,350
44,00,000 55,000 34,650

2017 – 18 15,263
33,00,000 41,250 25,987

2018 – 19 10,457
23,00,000 28,750 18,113

Total 46,250
1,00,00,000 1,25,000 78,750
Additionally, nearly Rs. 30,000 crore would be available through
convergence with MGNREGA in three years.
Meeting with States Slide No. 5
 1 Release of State Matching Share

States which are yet to be release State matching share for 2016-17 as per AwaasSoft.
 Himachal Pradesh
 Jammu & Kashmir
 Maharashtra
 Manipur
 Mizoram
 Meghalaya
 Nagaland
 Odisha
 Punjab
 Sikkim
 Rajasthan
 Uttar Pradesh (partially released)
 Telangana
Meeting with States Slide No. 6
2 Sanction of house to Beneficiaries
Mapping of villages & SECC
data verification by Gram
Sabha

Target Setting By States

Uploading of geo-tagged
Registration
photographs using AwaasApp
• Mobile No
• Bank A/c N • Existing dwelling unit
• Site for construction
• Aadhaar No.

SANCTION

Meeting with States Slide No. 7

 2 Mapping of Villages with SECC Data
Unmapped Villages with SECC Data vs Total Villages with SECC Data

States with unmapped SECC villages

100% 100%

90%

80% 77%

70%

60%
54%

50%

40%
40%

30%

20%

10%
3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1%
0%

Meeting with States Slide No. 8

** As on 18/04/2017 from AwaasSoft
2 Identification and Selection of Beneficiaries
Process Flow
Progress

1 Circulation of GP wise
list of eligible
beneficiaries Target Date for Finalising Permanent Waitlist
15/July/2016

2 Verification of Lists by
Gram Sabha

Universe for PMAY-G is 4.03

3 Constitution of Appellate
Committee
crore households, identified
through Socio Economic Caste
Census (SECC), 2011 data.

4 Resolution of
Grievances by Appellate
Committee
 After verification of 3.92 crore
households by Gram Sabha and
review by Appellate Authority, 2.39

5 Uploading and
Publication of Permanent
Wait list on AwaasSoft
crore beneficiaries have been
identified to be eligible to receive
assistance under PMAY-G.

PRC – July 2016 Slide No. 9

 2 Household Verification by Gram Sabhas
Percentage of households verified using SECC 2011
90%
83%
79%
80% 77%
74%
72%
70% 66% 65%
61%
59%
60%
51%
49%
50% 47%
45%
41% 41%
40% 35%
33%

30% 28%
24%
23%
20%
20%
12%
10%
0% 0% 0%
0%

More than 70 % 50 -70 % 30 – 50 % Upto 30 %

Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, Karnataka and Telangana are yet to start Slide No. 10
verification of households from the SECC list
 2 Targets fixed by States
Target set by State vs MoRD Target
States with 100% Targets set States having less than 100% Targets set
120%

Chattisgarh Gujarat
99% 99% 98%
100% 97% 96%

Himachal Madhya 87%

83%
Pradesh Pradesh 80% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75%

Jammu &
Kerala 60% 56%
Kashmir

Meghalaya Punjab 40%

20%
Tamil Nadu Rajasthan
0% 0% 0%
0%
Uttarakhand West Bengal

Karnataka

Meeting with States Slide No. 11

** As on 18/04/2017 from AwaasSoft
 2 Registrations Completed by States
Beneficiaries Registered vs MoRD Target
States with over 60% Registration Progress of Remaining States on Registrations
70%
Madhya
Rajasthan
Pradesh 60%
59%
56%

50%
Maharashtra Chattisgarh 50% 47%

40% 38%
West Bengal Odisha
30%
Himachal
Jharkhand
Pradesh 20%
15%
11% 9%
8%
Uttarakhand Gujarat 10%
5%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0%
Uttar Pradesh Kerala

Haryana

Meeting with States Slide No. 12

** As on 18/04/2017 from AwaasSoft
 2 Status of Geo-tagging
Beneficiaries Geo-tagged vis-a-vis MoRD Target
200%
180%
180%
166%
160%

140%
123%
120% 113%
104%100%
100% 96% 93%
87% 87%

80% 73%
66%
60% 59%
56%
60% 52% 50%
38%
40%

20% 15%
11% 9% 8%
5%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0%

70 - 90 %
Slide No. 13
More than 90 % 50 – 70 % Upto 50 %
 2 Houses Sanctioned
Houses Sanctioned vs MoRD Target
States with over States with Less Than 70% Houses Sanctioned
70% Houses 70%
Sanctioned 62%
Himachal 60%
55%
Pradesh
Madhya 50%

Pradesh 40%
40% 38% 37%

West Bengal 32%

30% 27%

Rajasthan
20%
15%
13%
Odisha 9%
10%
6%

0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Maharashtra 0%

Chattisgarh

Jharkhand

Meeting with States Slide No. 14

** As on 18/04/2017 from AwaasSoft
 2 1st Instalment Paid
Percentage of beneficiaries receiving 1st instalment vis-a-vis MoRD Target

70%
63% 63%

60%
53%
51%
49%
50%

42%
40% 37%
35%

30%
30% 28%

20%
16%

10% 7% 6%
5%
3%
1%
0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
0%

30 - 50 %
Slide No. 15
More than 50 % 10 – 30 % Upto 10 %
 2 Program Management Unit in States
Suggested constitution Maharashtra and

1
State Jharkhand
• State Nodal officer
State level PMU to be • Technical Expert in the field of
setup construction of house
• Expert to look after At State Level
IT/MIS/PFMS
• Expert to look after all the

2
Financial matters
• Social Mobilisation expert and
Training Coordinator
PMU at all levels -UP,
District Bihar, Kerala and Haryana,
District PMUs to be setup
• Coordinator for all the State and District Level in

3
activities of PMAY-G at Tripura
District
• IT Personnel
• Training Coordinator

Block / Block level

Panchayat PMUs to be Block Andhra Pradesh,
setup • Coordinator for all the Telangana and Karnataka
activities of PMAY at Block &
Village level

4
• Every house of PMAY-G to be Have dedicated organizations,
tagged to village level viz. Housing Corporations,
Every PMAY-G house to
functionary. which look into all the aspects
be tagged to a village
of rural housing
functionary to monitor
PRC – Julycompletion
2016 Slide No. 16
 3 Mason Training
Process Flow

1
Time lines agreed to in 2016
Engaging a Training
Provider in consultation
with CSDCI
2nd week of July, Engagement of Training

2
Providers in coordination
with CSDCI
Training of trainer
3rd week of July Start ToT

3
4th week of July Start Pilot Mason training
Pilot training of mason

4 Scaling up training for

the State
Pilot trainings taken up in

Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand,

5
Uttarakhand, Gujarat,
Rajasthan and
Assessment and Maharashtra
certification of masons

Slide No. 17
PRC – July 2016
 3 Mason Training

TARGET 40,000 Masons by June 2017

Target Under Mason Training

State Masons to be trained State Masons to be trained

by June, 2017 by June, 2017
Maharashtra 20000 Bihar 3000
Madhya Pradesh 10000 West Bengal 3000
Rajasthan 8000 Assam 2000
Andhra Pradesh 6500
Uttarakhand 1200
Chhattisgarh 5000
Tripura 900
Jharkhand 5000
UP 5000 Sikkim 500

Total 70100
Meeting with States Slide No. 18
 3 Mason Training
 Rs. 15 Lakhs has been released to 21 States for conducting pilot
training of masons.

 The pilot training of masons had been conducted in the States of

Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Uttarakhand, Gujarat, Rajasthan and
Maharashtra.

 The remaining states to conduct pilot training .

 All states to scale up training for the entire state based on

experiences in the pilot.

 States may submit proposal for gap funding for organizing training
with sufficient justification.
Meeting with States Slide No. 19
 4 Housing Design Typologies
Process Flow Progress

1
Studies to be Studies in 18 Remaining 16 to
Typology study conducted in 34 States already be taken up this
States/UTs taken up year

2 Preliminary design type Typology studies

conducted in
18 States
UNDP – 13
IIT Delhi - 5

3 Presentation to Ministry
House Design Typologies have been finalized in 14 States
(Assam, Chhattisgarh, Himachal Pradesh, Manipur,
Meghalaya, Odisha, Rajasthan, Tripura, Uttar Pradesh,

4 State consultation
West Bengal, Mizoram, Sikkim, Uttarakhand)

State consultations Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya

5
remaining in 4 Pradesh and Jammu &
States Kashmir
Final design

6
Demo houses
taken up in
Demo building Tripura And
PRC – July 2016 Maharashtra Slide No. 20
 4 House Design Typologies

Activities Required at the

Compendium of House STATES’ End
Design Typologies released
by Honorable PM
1 Construction of Demo
Houses

2 Incorporation of Alternate
Technologies in SOR

3
Wide publicity to Designs
among Beneficiaries

Meeting with States Slide No. 21

 4 House Design Typologies
Progress Tracker

Development
Preliminary Presentation to State Demo of state-level
State/Activity Typology study Final design
design type Ministry consultation building upscaling
plan

1 Madhya Pradesh
2 Manipur
3 Sikkim
4 Uttar Pradesh
5 West Bengal
6 Bihar
7 Uttarakhand

8 Himachal Pradesh
9 Mizoram
10 Jammu & Kashmir
11 Chhattisgarh
12 Jharkhand
13 Assam
14 Odisha
15 Rajasthan

16 Meghalaya

17 Maharashtra
18 Tripura

Meeting with States Slide No. 22

 Challenges and policy issues
• Identification – Mapping of revenue villages to SECC
village, beneficiaries to villages, deletion of ineligibe
households, addition of eligible households left out of
list, wrong capturing of category in SECC, Addressing
of grievances through Appellate Mechanism.
• Land to landless
• PFMS – Bank account verification, tracking of FTOs,
Pending transfer of assistance, False success / reject
cases.
• Mason Training – Identification of Training Provider,
Conduct of pilot training, scaling of training, linking of
trained masons to the beneficiaries.
 Challenges and policy issues
• Quality – Ensuring quality in construction of house,
availability of material at reasonable rates, use of locally
available materials

• Awareness to beneficiaries – about the scheme,

eligibility, house designs, quality construction material,
loan to willing beneficiaries.

• Monitoring – Setting up of PMU at different levels,

Geo-tagging, disposal of grievances

• House designs – Identification, construction of demo

houses, Penetration / adoption of identified house
designs
 IAY

PRC – January 2017 Slide No. 25

Points of Discussion IAY

1 Completion of incomplete IAY Houses in 2016-17

1.1 States with Higher Completion Rates

1.2 States with High incomplete houses

PRC 2017: PMAY-G

 IAY Progress in FY 2016-17
States with Highest States with Largest
completion in 2016-17 number of incomplete
houses as on 31.3.17

Bihar - 4.09
Bihar – 5.76 lakhs
Lakhs * Total Incomplete Houses 36,39,368

Maharashtra – * As on 1/4/2016
UP- 4.58 lakhs
1.83 Lakhs

Assam – 1.44
WB- 3.70 lakhs
Lakhs * Total Houses Completed 25,42,648
* As on 21/04/2017
Karnataka –
MP- 2.54 lakhs From AwaasSoft
1.06 Lakhs

Rajasthan – Houses Completed as per

Assam- 1.82 lakh
0.96 Lakhs reports of States (status 32,14,506
to be updated on
Jharkhand- 1.15 Gujarat – 0.66 AwaasSoft as these could
lakh Lakhs not be uploaded due to
IT/Network issues.)

Meeting with States Slide No. 27

 % Completed IAY Houses (As on 20.04.2017)
Houses Completed vs Houses Sanctioned from 2013-2016
120%

100% 96% 96% 93%

92% 92% 91%
88% 88% 87% 86%
80%
80% 74%
70% 69% 69%
67% 66%
63%
58%
60%
51% 50%
49%

40% 38% 38%

40%

23%
20% 15%
9%
1%
0%

More than 90 % 70 -90 % 50 – 70 % Upto 50 %

Slide No. 28
 % Incomplete IAY Houses (20.04.2017)
Incomplete Houses Remaining vs Houses Sanctioned from 2013-2016
120%

99%
100%
91%
85%

80% 77%

62% 62% 60%

60%
51% 50%
49%
42%
40% 37% 34%
33% 31%
31% 30%
26%
20%
20% 14% 13% 12% 12%
9% 8% 8%
7%
4% 4%

0%

More than 70 % 40 – 70 % 20 – 40 % Upto 20 %

Slide No. 29
Thank you…