DURATION: Introduced in the year 2005, and still an ongoing programme.
WHERE:
• Implemented at the Institution level as an experiment.
• Later on, extended to other government schools at district level. FOCUS AREA: • To enhance the academic performance of the students by assigning care and responsibility of at least three students to one teacher. OBJECTIVE: • Improve academic performance of the student. • Improve student attendance at school. • Improve class participation and interaction. • Offer guidance, advice, counseling in personal matters if desired. • Improve teacher student relationship. DESCRIPTION: • Check class attendance, record of regularity of class works and home works, record of disciplinary issues . • Offer guidance, advice or counseling. • Other all-round areas of student's personal life, family background, social life etc. STRATEGY: • Freedom to express concerns in smaller groups. METHOD: • Meeting the students in the assigned groups and enquiring about their study habits, class attendance, health etc. • At times, meeting one to one, if the need arises, because there might be issues where personal counseling might be required. • Meeting sessions were usually held after school for half an hour or more if necessary. • Maintenance of a meeting and progress register to record sessions and submission for monthly reviews to assigned coordinators or the Principal of the school. Resource requirement and mobilization: • Physical: A quiet classroom with chairs, benches etc. • Human: Co-operative students and an empathetic teacher. • Financial: Some small amount of money to buy a register . Support extended by Community and the State/Education department: • By conducting seminars of the heads of schools for discussion and possibility. • Implementation of the idea in all the government schools in the district. ENSURANCE OF CONTINUITY BEYOND THE TENURE OF POSTING THE INNOVATORS
• Encouragement of the incumbent Principal of
the school to carry on the programme. • Chances of further follow-up in the schools where it was introduced. Problems faced in giving shape to the idea of innovation and its implementation: • Some assigned teachers were irregular to arrange meetings with the students • Some students would play truant or refuse to participate in the interactions • In bigger schools, as was in my case, often there were not enough rooms/space for meeting privately affecting the quality of the sessions • Some teachers would not maintain or submit the progress reports regularly. thus affecting progress • Sometimes, due to school and administrative duties, the head of the school delayed the reviews of the meetings • Often, since the assigned teachers were not trained in counseling as such, could not maintain confidentiality of the sessions which hurt the sentiments of some students Success of the Innovation:
• Many students started performing better
academically as well as their all-round development. • The school produced many subject toppers capped by a student securing top 3 rank at the state HSSLC examination in commerce stream. • Students frequently ranked in the top three in essay, extempore, debate, science seminars etc at the district as well as at the state levels. Mr. Nyemwang Subject topper award in Alternative English along with the teacher CONCLUSION • Better performance academically as well as their all-round development. • Produced many subject toppers. • Frequent ranking in co-curricular activities at state level. Governor visiting MHSS Receiving Governor’s Commendation Certificate from our honorable Chief Minister