1.

Bradley Effectiveness model

In 1985, L.H. Bradley wrote a hand book

on Curriculum Leadership and Development.
This book provides indicators that can help
measure the effectiveness of a developed or
written curriculum.For a purpose of the
classroom teachers, some of the statements
were simplified
First, you have to identify what curriculum you will
evaluate

Example;
Elementary Science Curriculum
Teacher Education Curriculum
Student Teaching Curriculum
Field Study Curriculum

Then find out if the curriculum you are evaluating

answer YES or NO .
Answering YES to all the questions means, good
curriculum as described by Bradley
INDICATORS Descriptive Questions YES or NO
Vertical • Does the Curriculum reflect the format(i.e k to 12,
Curriculum OBE,Inquiry,etc.) that enables teachers quickly
Continuity access what is being taught in the grade/year levels
below or above the current level? (Ex.If you are
looking at science 5, below means Science 4 and
above means, Science 6

Horizontal • Does the curriculum provide content and objectives

Curriculum that are common to all classes of the same grade
Continuity leve?(Ex.All English 101 for all 1st year college
students)
Instruction Based • Are lesson plans/syllabi/course design derived from
on Curriculum the curriculum and strategies? Are materials used
correlated with the content, objectives and
activities?
Broad Involvement • Is there evidence of involvement of the different
curriculum stakeholders in the planning, designing
and implementation and review of the curriculum?
Long Range • Is review cycle followed within the period of
Planning planning and implementation of the curriculum.
INDICATORS Descriptive Questions YES or NO

Possitive Human • Did the initial thoughts about the

Relation curriculum come from
teachers,principals,curriculum leaders and
other stakeholders?
Theory-Into Practice • Is there clarity of
vision,mission,graduation
outcomes,program philosophy, learning
outcomes jn the curriculum?
Planned Change • Are there tangible evidence to show that
the internal and external publics accept
the developed program?

If any of the indicators is answered NO, a actions should

be made to make it yes.
2. Tyler Objectives Centered Model
Ralph Tyler in 1950 proposed a curriculum
evaluation model which until now continues
to influence many curriculum assessment
processes. His monograph was entitled
Basic Principles of curriculum and
instruction.
In using the Tyler’s model, the following
curriculum components and processes are
identified in curriculum evaluation.
 Curriculum Elements Evaluation Process Action Taken:
YES or NO
1. Objectives/Intended 1.Pre-determined intended learning
Learning Outcomes outcomes or objectives.

2. Situation or Context 2.Identify the situation/context that gives

opportunity to develop behaviour or
achieve objectives
3. Evaluation 3.Select,modify and construct evaluation
InstrumentsTools instrument or tools.Check its
objectivity,reliability and validity.

4. Utilization of Tool 4.Utilize the tools to obtain results.

5.Compare the results obtained from
several instrument before and after to
determine the change.
5.Analysis of Results 5.Analyze the results obtained to
determine strength and
weaknesses.Identify possible explanation
about the reasons for the particular
pattern.

6.Utilization of Results 6.Use the results to make the necessary

Using all the steps to evaluate
the curriculum and obtaining
all YES answer would mean
the curriculum has PASSED
the standards.Tyler’s Model of
evaluating curriculum is
relatively easy to understand
which many teachers can
follow.
 3.Daniel Stufflebeam’s
Context,Input,Process Product
Model (CIPP)
The CIIP Model of Curriculum Evaluation was a
product of the Phi Delta Kappa committee
chaired by Daniel Stufflebeam.The model made
emphasis that the result of evaluation should
provide data for decision making. There are four
stages of program Operation.
1. Context Evaluation -assess needs and problems in
the context for decision makers to determine the
goals and objectives of the program/curriculum.

1. Input Evaluation - assess alternative means based

on the inputs for the achievement of objectives to
help decision makers to choose options for optimal
means.
3. Process Evaluation- monitors the processes both to ensure
that the means are actually being implemented and make
necessary modifications.

4. Product evaluation-compares actual ends with intended

ends and leads to a series of recycling decisions.

For all the four stages, the six steps are suggested.
Stages of the CIIP Steps Taken in all the stages
model
1.Context Evaluation Step 1: Identify the king of decision to be
made.

Step 2: Identify the kinds of data to make

2.Input Evaluation
that decision

Step 3: Collect the data needed

3.Process Evaluation
Step 4: Establish the criteria to determine
quality of data.

4.Product Evaluation Step 5. Analyze data based on the criteria.

Step 6. Organize needed information needed
for decision makers.
Thank You !

-Ms. Diana Velasco