Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3
CLEANING VALIDATION
6
Limitations
a. Cost incurred.
b. People.
c. Delays.
d. Inadequate equipments.
7
Elements / components
of validation
8
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
• As per the FDA, 21 CFR part 211,
subpart D, “Equipments and utensils
shall be cleaned, maintained and
sanitized at appropriate intervals to
prevent malfunctions or
contamination that would alter the
safety, identity, strength, quality or
purity of the drug product beyond
the official or other established
requirement. Written procedures
shall be established and followed for
cleaning”. 9
CLEANING MECHANISMS
10
CLEANING MECHANISMS
• Mechanical action
refers to physical actions
such as
brushing,
scrubbing and
12
CLEANING MECHANISMS
25
1. SELECTION OF CLEANING METHOD
Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited have designed
the facility with manual cleaning operations.
Following were taken into consideration for
selecting manual cleaning method.
§ “Seeing is Believing”
§ Product diversity / range
§ Risk of failure of cleaning equipments
§ Validation of automated cleaning equipments
§ Trained and experienced working staff
26
1. SELECTION OF CLEANING METHOD
• The equipment design and manual cleaning method are
taken into consideration for selection of equipment. All
equipments selected viewing following cleaning
considerations:
§ Ease of disassembling of contact parts
§ All contact surfaces are non-reactive to cleaning
method
§ Dedicated disposable materials where difficult to clean
e.g. FBD bags, filters, Disposable bags in transit
containers
Least chance of contamination from equipment non-
contact parts e.g. lubricants, gaskets, drive system,
mechanical seal etc.
27
1. SELECTION OF CLEANING METHOD
The risk involved in manual cleaning
processes is taken care of with following:
§ Proper washroom design with drying,
protection and storage requirement.
§ Detailed cleaning SOP
§ Training of cleaning operators
28
2. SELECTING THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR THE
CONTAMINATION LIMIT
• Limit calculation is done on the basis of
smallest therapeutic dose:
Factors such as the batch size of the
next product, the route of administration,
and the largest daily dose of subsequent
product, which might be administered, are
important in the calculation.
All of these factors mentioned
previously are usually summarized in an
equation, which may take the following
general form:
29
2. SELECTING THE SCIENTIFIC BASIS FOR
THE CONTAMINATION LIMIT
MAR = TD x BS x SF
LDD
Where, MAR = the max. allowable Residue
TD = Smallest therapeutic dose amongst all
products.
BS = Batch size of the next product to be
manufactured
in the same equipment, which has the least
value
of BS/LDD within the group, is taken
SF = The safety factor
LDD = The largest daily dose amongst the next
product
to be manufactured in the same equipment.
30
SAFETY FACTOR
Normally accepted Safety Factor for
different dosage forms are given in the
following table:
32
2. SELECTING THE SCIENTIFIC
BASIS FOR THE CONTAMINATION
LIMIT
33
2. SELECTING THE SCIENTIFIC
BASIS FOR THE CONTAMINATION
LIMIT
THE APPROACH TAKEN
Dose related contamination limit shall be
determined.
If this limit is more than 10 ppm, then a value
of less than 10 ppm shall be the acceptance
limit.
Samples for testing the residue shall be
taken only if the equipment surface is
visually clean.
34
MAR LIMIT IN PPM
To determine the MAR in ppm would be =
MAR limit in milligram .
B. Size of subsequent product in kg
If this calculation gives a value more than
10 ppm, equivalent value of 10 ppm in
milligram has to be calculated, this would
be …….
10 x MAR limit in subsequent batch in units of
milligram
MAR limit in subsequent batch in units of ppm
35
MAR LIMIT CALCULATION
36
MAR LIMIT CALCULATION
MAR = TD x BS x SF
LDD
TD = Therapeutic Dose of tablet
= 1 x 0.25 mg = 0.25 mg
BS = Batch Size of tablet = 48.23 kg
SF = Safety Factor for Tablet dosage form
= 1/1000
LDD = Largest Daily dose of tablet
= 9 x 742 mg = 6678 mg
37
MAR LIMIT CALCULATION
40
4. SELECTING THE WORST CASE
RELATED TO THE PRODUCT:
41
4. SELECTING THE WORST CASE
RELATED TO THE PRODUCT:
42
5. ESTABLISHING THE STORAGE
PERIOD AFTER CLEANING
The objective for establishing time
limit between equipment cleaning and
reuse is to ensure that the equipment
remains clean till the next use. This
needs demonstration that there is no
microbial proliferation in cleaned
equipments during storage.
43
5. ESTABLISHING THE STORAGE
PERIOD AFTER CLEANING
For establishing the time limit, the
equipment should be dried. Initial swab
samples for surface should be taken.
Thereafter, the equipment should be
protected as prescribed in the SOP and
stored in its designated area. Periodic
samples of product contact surface for
microbiological contamination should be
taken. (1st day, 2nd day, 3rd day etc.)
Based on the data generated establish
the acceptable time limit.
44
5. ESTABLISHING THE STORAGE
PERIOD AFTER CLEANING
• Cleaned equipment surface sample (contact
surface only) test results should demonstrate
absence of specified micro organisms (E.
Coli, Salmonella etc.)
• The acceptance level for surface sampling is
25CFU per 25 sq. cm.
• Representative colonies of the
microorganisms isolated should be identified
in order to build a plant microbial flora
baseline with the aim of locating and
eliminating potential contamination sources. 45
6. SELECTING THE SAMPLING METHOD
The two main sampling methods are:
1. Swab sampling.
2. Rinse sampling.
46
6. SELECTING THE SAMPLING METHOD
6.1 Swab sampling method
• This method is based on the physical removal
of residue left over on a piece of equipment
after it has been cleaned and dried. A swab
wetted with a solvent is rubbed over a
previously determined sample surface area to
remove any potential residue, and thereafter
extracted into a known volume of solvent in
which the contaminant active ingredient
residue is soluble. The amount of contaminant
per swab is then determined by an analytical
method of adequate sensitivity.
47
6. SELECTING THE SAMPLING METHOD
Advantages of swab sampling method.
• Direct evaluation of surface contamination.
• Insoluble or poorly soluble substances may be
physically removed from the equipment
surfaces.
• Hard-to-clean but accessible areas are easily
incorporated into the final evaluation.
Disadvantages of swab sampling method.
• Difficult to implement in large-scale
manufacturing equipment.
• Extrapolation of results obtained for a small
sample surface area to the whole product
contact surface area.
48
6. SELECTING THE SAMPLING METHOD
6.2 Rinse sampling method
• This method is based on the
analytical determination of a sample
of the last rinsing solvent (generally
water) used in the cleaning
procedure. The volume of solvent
used for the last rinse must be
known to allow for the quantitative
determination of the contamination.
49
6. SELECTING THE SAMPLING METHOD
Advantages of Rinse sample method.
• Ease of sampling.
• Evaluation of entire product contact surface.
• Accessibility of all equipment parts to the rinsing
solvent.
• Best fitted to sealed or large scale equipment and
equipment which is not easily or routinely
disassembled.
Disadvantages of Rinse sample method.
• No physical removal of the contaminant.
• The rinsing solvent may not reach inaccessible part
of equipment.
• Use of organic solvents for water insoluble
materials. 50
6.SELECTING THE SAMPLING METHOD
Looking at the advantages and
disadvantages of both the sampling
methods swab sampling method
was selected. The cleaning
procedure uses water as a solvent
and we have dosage forms having
active ingredient which is insoluble
in water.
51
SAMPLING LOCATIONS & NUMBER
OF SAMPLES
The sample locations are dictated by
worst-case conditions. The
equipment’s hard to clean locations
are identified based on cleaning
experience and the design of
equipment. The number of samples
should take into consideration the
equipment surface area, design,
shape, operating principle and
construction material. 52
SAMPLING LOCATIONS & NUMBER
OF SAMPLES
53
SAMPLE SURFACE AREA
57
7. SELECTING THE ANALYTICAL
METHOD
• NON-SPECIFIC METHODS.
Spectrophotometric methods in the
visible, infrared, or UV ranges
Total organic carbon (TOC)
Other Methods
For monitoring cleaning procedure
TOC method is used. It offers at a
moderate cost and in addition to its
rapidity, a detection capability down to
the ppb range.
58
8. DOCUMENTATION
• Validation Master Plan
• Technical Transfer Information
such as solubility of product ingredients,
therapeutic dose, equipments to be used and
its contact surface area, batch size, minimum
daily dose, maximum daily dose etc for the
preparation of Equipment Matrix &
Product Matrix.
• Equipment Qualification Reports
(DQ/IQ/OQ/PQ)
59
8. DOCUMENTATION
• Equipment logs
• Training records
• Method validation of analytical test
method.
• Cleaning Validation Protocol
• Cleaning Validation Reports
60
8. DOCUMENTATION
63
At least three consecutive applications of
the cleaning procedure should be
performed and shown to be successful in
order to prove that the method is
validated.
64
The validation of cleaning method is
only meaningful if the written
cleaning procedures (on which the
validation is based) are always
meticulously followed.
65
Thanks
66