UTILIZATION OF SMARTPHONE AND INTERNET

AND ITS ACADEMIC, SOCIAL, ETHICAL, RELIGIOUS CONSEQUENCES

PRESENTED BY: AHTISHAM AHSAN KHAN & HAMMAD MALIK

PRESENTED TO: DR. ASHFAQ AHMAD
SEMESTER: 8TH REGULAR
 INTRODUCTION
INTERNET:

 INTERNET IS A GLOBALLY CONNECTED NETWORK SYSTEM THAT USES TCP/IP TO TRANSMIT DATA VIA
VARIOUS TYPES OF MEDIA

 INTERNET IS A COLLECTION OF MILLIONS OF COMPUTERS AROUND THE WORLD THAT ARE

CONNECTED BETWEEN EACH OTHER

 THE INTERNET IS A NETWORK OF GLOBAL EXCHANGES – INCLUDING PRIVATE, PUBLIC, BUSINESS,

ACADEMIC AND GOVERNMENT NETWORKS

 THE TERMS INTERNET AND WORLD WIDE WEB ARE OFTEN USED INTERCHANGEABLY BUT THEY ARE
NOT EXACTLY THE SAME THING
 INTRODUCTION (CONT.)
THE INTERNET IS THE MOST COST-EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATIONS METHOD IN THE WORLD, IN
WHICH THE FOLLOWING SERVICES
 EMAIL
 WEB-ENABLED AUDIO/VIDEO CONFERENCING SERVICES
 ONLINE MOVIES AND GAMING
 DATA TRANSFER/FILE-SHARING
 INSTANT MESSAGING
 ONLINE SHOPPING, FINANCIAL SERVICE
 INTRODUCTION(CONT.)
• IN FIRST DECADE OF 20 CENTURY INTERNET WAS NOT COMMON IN PAKISTAN

• ONLY LIMITED COMPANIES PROVIDED INTERNET AT HIGH PRICES

• LAUNCHING OF 3G AND 4G INCREASE INTERNET USE

• NOW INTERNET COMPANIES ARE PROVIDING PACKAGES AT LOW PRICES

• NOW STUDENTS ARE GETTING BENEFIT FROM INTERNET

• UNIVERSITIES ALSO PROVIDING INTERNET FREE OF COST

• INTERNET HAS BOTH POSITIVE AS WELL AS POSITIVE USES

• EXCESS OF INVOLVEMENT IN INTERNET IS PHYSICALLY, MENTALLY, SOCIALLY, EFFECTING THEM

 INTRODUCTION
SMARTPHONE;
SMARTPHONE IS A MOBILE PHONE RUNNING A COMPLETE OPERATING SYSTEM IN A MANNER SIMILAR
TO A TRADITIONAL COMPUTER.
SMARTPHONE HELP USERS TO DO VARIOUS FOLLOWING ACTIVITIES
 SHARING INFORMATION

 SENDING AND RECEIVING EMAILS, CHATTING

 OPENING AND EDITING DOCUMENTS,

 PAYING FOR PRODUCTS, LEARNING, BROWSING AND SHOPPING

 PROBLEM STATEMENT
INTERNET IS BECOMING NEED OF EVERY STUDENT FOR LEARNING, SOCIAL,
ENTERTAINMENT, AND OTHER ACTIVITIES

NO STUDENT CAN EFFICIENTLY & EFFECTIVELY WORK WITHOUT IT.

SMARTPHONE IS ANOTHER GADGET IN WHICH STUDENTS ARE GETTING MUCH

INVOLVED

ALTHOUGH THESE DEVICES REVOLUTIONIZED DAILY LIFE

THESE DEVICES HAVE BOTH POSITIVE AS WELL AS NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES

THE NEW GENERATION IS SPENDING MOST OF ITS TIME USING INTERNET AND
SMARTPHONE WHICH EFFECT ITS CONSEQUENCES
 OBJECTIVE OF RESEARCH:

THE OBJECTIVE OF OUR RESEARCH PAPER IS TO EVALUATE UTILIZATION OF INTERNET AND

SMARTPHONE BY UNIVERSITY OF SARGODHA STUDENTS, HOW INTERNET AND SMARTPHONE

INFLUENCE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE, STUDENT SOCIAL LIFE, ETHICAL AND ECONOMIC

CONDITION. WE ALSO AIM TO DESCRIBE RELIGIOUS CONSEQUENCES OF SMARTPHONE AND

INTERNET
 RESEARCH QUESTIONS:

1. HOW DO STUDENTS UTILIZE SMARTPHONE AND INTERNET FOR LEARNING AND OTHER PURPOSE?

2. HOW DO SMARTPHONE AND INTERNET INFLUENCE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE?

3. DESCRIBE HOW MANY STUDENTS ARE SPENDING A LOT OF TIME AND RESOURCES ON
SMARTPHONE AND INTERNET?

4. HOW DO STUDENTS PARTICIPATE IN SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES?

5. DOES SMARTPHONES AND INTERNET CAUSE ANY ECONOMIC ISSUES TO THE STUDENTS?

6. HOW DOES SMARTPHONE AND INTERNET EFFECT RELIGIOUS VALUES?

 LITERATURE REVIEW
• MUSAUD ASDAQUE(2010) IN HIS RESEARCH INDICATE THAT THE USE OF INTERNET IS ONE OF THE
MAJOR FACTORS AFFECTING THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AND SOCIAL LIFE OF UNIVERSITY
STUDENTS

• KIBONA AND MGAYA (2015) IN HIS RESEARCH REVEALED THAT SMARTPHONES BRING NEGATIVE
RESULTS ON STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE ACADEMICALLY BECAUSE THE MAJORITIES GPA,S

• LAMIA & MOHAMMADI (2013) CONDUCTED A RESEARCH TO EXPLORE ANY ASSOCIATION, IF EXIST,
BETWEEN FACEBOOK USAGE AND STUDENT’S GPA.
 LITERATURE REVIEW (CONT.)

• GROSSECK & L. TIRU, IN THEIR STUDY FOUND THAT THE MAJORITY OF STUDENTS SPEND SIGNIFICANT
TIME ON FACEBOOK MORE FOR SOCIAL USES

• D. ZECIC, A. BAKKER & ET AL (2014) FOUND THAT THE USE OF THE INTERNET HAS BECOME A PART OF
LIFE OF EVERY STUDENT AND A MEAN TO SEARCH FOR THE INFORMATION

• KIM AND ALTMANN (2013) ALSO FOUND THAT GENERALLY EACH STUDENT HAD 80 APPLICATIONS ON
HIS/HER SMARTPHONE, AND 16% OF THE APPLICATIONS WERE USED FOR SOME KIND OF LEARNING.
 LITERATURE REVIEW (CONT.)
• HEJAB & SHAIDAH(2014) SUGGEST IN HIS RESEARCH THAT; NEARLY EVERY STUDENT AT THE
UNIVERSITY CAN AFFORD TO OWN A SMARTPHONE.

• JEE HYUN HA, ET AL (2008) THE EXCESSIVE USER GROUP WAS MORE DEPRESSIVE AND HAD HIGHER
INTERPERSONAL ANXIETY AND LOWER SELF-ESTEEM THAN THE COMPARISON GROUP

• R.D NELSON & ZUCK (2013) SUGGEST THAT TIME SPENT USING INTERNET DOES NOT ERODE THE
DAILY LIFE ACTIVITIES AND INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION OF YOUTH WITH FAMILY AND
FRIENDS.
 VARIABLES

 USES OF INTERNET

 USES OF SMARTPHONE

 CONSEQUENCES OF SMARTPHONE

 CONSEQUENCES OF INTERNET
 Academic

Internet

Social

Consequences
Ethical

Religious
Smart phones

Economic
 METHODOLOGY
PURPOSE OF STUDY:
THIS IS DESCRIPTIVE RESEARCH

POPULATION:

POPULATION OF OUR RESEARCH IS STUDENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF SARGODHA

UNIT OF ANALYSIS:

INDIVIDUAL

DATA COLLECTION:

WE COLLECT PRIMARY DATA FOR OUR RESEARCH

 METHODOLOGY

RESEARCH INSTRUMENT:

SURVEY RESEARCH

DATA COLLECTION METHOD:

STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE WAS USED FOR DATA COLLECTION

SAMPLE:

THE SAMPLE SIZE OF STUDY IS 200 RANDOMLY SELECTED STUDENTS

ANALYSIS TOOL

THE ANALYSIS WAS DONE BY USING SPSS SOFTWARE.

ANALYSIS

Level of education

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid under graduate 104 52.0 52.0 52.0

graduate 53 26.5 26.5 78.5

post graduate 43 21.5 21.5 100.0

Total 200 100.0 100.0

ANALYSIS

Gender

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid male
86 43.0 43.0 43.0
female
114 57.0 57.0 100.0
Total
200 100.0 100.0
ANALYSIS

Daily time spend on internet by student

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid {3-4 hours} 92 46.0 46.0 46.0
{5-8 hours} 55 27.5 27.5 73.5
{8-10 hours} 28 14.0 14.0 87.5
{10-15 hours} 7 3.5 3.5 91.0
{more than 15
18 9.0 9.0 100.0
hours}
Total 200 100.0 100.0
ANALYSIS

Use of smartphone daily

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid {3-4 hours} 42 21.0 21.0 21.0
{5-8 hours} 72 36.0 36.0 57.0
{8-10 hours} 36 18.0 18.0 75.0
{10-15 hours} 27 13.5 13.5 88.5
{more than 15
hours} 23 11.5 11.5 100.0

Total 200 100.0 100.0

ANALYSIS

Monthly Expenses on Internet

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid less than Rs 500
94 47.0 47.0 47.0
Rs.500-Rs1000 48 24.0 24.0 71.0
Rs.1000-Rs1500
21 10.5 10.5 81.5
Rs1500-Rs2500
26 13.0 13.0 94.5
more than 2500
11 5.5 5.5 100.0
Total
200 100.0 100.0
ANALYSIS

Monthly Expenses on Smartphone

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent
Valid less than Rs 500 117 58.5 58.8 58.8
Rs.500-Rs1000 42 21.0 21.1 79.9
Rs.1000-Rs1500 25 12.5 12.6 92.5
Rs1500-Rs2500 9 4.5 4.5 97.0
more than 2500 6 3.0 3.0 100.0
Total 199 99.5 100.0
Missing System 1 .5
Total 200 100.0
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS
ANALYSIS