Professional Documents
Culture Documents
&
Conduct of Judges
Created By :
Yolanda Pusvita Sari 8111416024
Lowrenszya Siagian 8111416198
Cindy Paramita 8111416200
Ahmadi 8111416217
Sesyana Praniananda 8111416279
Chandra Dwiki 8111416304
Annas Sandy 8111417322
CONTENTS
1. LEGAL BASIS
2. DEFINITION
3. BASIC PRINCIPLES OF CODE OF ETHICS & CONDUCT OF JUDGES
4. OBLIGATIONS, PROHIBITION, EXAMPLE OF VIOLATION
5. SUPERVISION ON IMPLEMENTATION
6. EXAMINATION & SANCTIONS OF VIOLATION
7. RELEVANCE OF CODE OF ETHICS NOWADAYS
8. COMMENT FROM JUDGE ABOUT CODE OF ETHICS
9. DISCUSSION ABOUT THE CASE OF VIOLATION
LEGAL BASIS
DEFINITION OF CODE OF ETHICS
&
CONDUCT OF JUDGES
1. Fair Behavior
Fair behavior are based on a principle that everyone is equal before the law. The most basic demands of
justice are giving treatment and giving equal opportunity and equality to everyone.
The following below are some restrictions on the conduct of fair behavior:
Judges are prohibited from giving the impression that one of the parties who is currently in a litigation or
power including the prosecutor and the witness are in a special position to influence the judge concerned.
The judge may not communicate with parties who litigate outside the trial, unless done in the court building
for the sake of the smooth running of the trial, known to the litigants, does not violate the principle of
equality of treatment and impartiality, etc.
The following are some obligations in carrying out fair behavior:
Judges must carry out their legal duties by respecting the presumption of innocence, without expecting
compensation.
The judge must be impartial, both inside and outside the court, and still maintain and foster the trust
of the people who seek justice. The judge must avoid matters which may result in the revocation of his
right to try the case in question.
The following are some examples of violations of fair behavior that are often carried out by Judges in the
trial:
In the trial the Judge asks using sentences, such as: "why did you steal?" "Where did you steal?"
The judge stated to one of the parties "your case is difficult to win!" (Inside or outside the trial).
BASIC PRINCIPLES
(10 RULES OF BEHAVIOR)
2. Honest behavior
Can and dare to state about what is right and wrong. Honesty encourages the formation of strong
individuals and raises awareness of the nature of rights and good.
The following are some examples of honest behavior violations that are often carried out by Judges in the
trial:
The judge allows his family members to relate to the parties (Advocates, Prosecutors, Persons who are
being tried, etc.) who have both direct and indirect interests.
The judge as the resource person is given an honorarium that exceeds the salary that should be
received.
BASIC PRINCIPLES
(10 RULES OF BEHAVIOR)
The following are some prohibitions in implementing wise and wise behavior:
Judges are prohibited from hearing cases where the family member of the judge in question acts on behalf of a
litigant party or as a party who has an interest in the case.
Judges are prohibited from allowing their residence to be used by a member of a legal profession to accept clients
or accept other members of the legal profession.
The following are some obligations in carrying out arif & wise behavior:
Judges must avoid despicable actions.
The judge, in his personal relationship with other members of the legal profession who
regularly conducts court proceedings, is obliged to avoid situations that can arouse
suspicion or partiality. Judges in carrying out their judicial duties must be free from the
influence of the family and other third parties.
The following are some examples of violations of arif & wise behavior that are often carried
out by Judges in the trial:
The judge allows his family members to relate to the parties (Advocates, Prosecutors,
Persons who are being tried, etc.) who have both direct and indirect interests.
The judge as the resource person is given an honorarium that exceeds the salary that should
be received.
BASIC PRINCIPLES
(10 RULES OF BEHAVIOR)
4. Be independent
Able to act alone without the help of others, free from any interference and free from any influence.
An independent attitude encourages the formation of a strong Judge's behavior, adheres to the
principles and beliefs of the truth according to moral demands and applicable legal provisions.
5. High integrity
An attitude, personality that is whole, authoritative, honest and unshakeable. High integrity is in
essence manifested in a loyal and strong attitude adhering to the values or norms that apply in
carrying out the task.
6. To be responsible
Willing to carry out the best of everything that becomes his authority and duty, and has the
courage to bear all the consequences of the exercise of his authority and duties.
7. Upholding Self-Esteem
Self-esteem means that the dignity and honor of human beings must be maintained and upheld by everyone.
The principle of upholding self-esteem, especially the Judge, will encourage and form a strong and resilient
person, so that a person is formed who always maintains the dignity and dignity as a Judicial apparatus.
8. High discipline
Obey the norms or rules that are believed to be noble calls to carry out the mandate and trust of
the people who seek justice. High discipline will encourage the formation of an orderly person in
carrying out tasks, sincerity in dedication and strive to be an example in his environment, and not
to abuse the trustee entrusted to him.
The following are some examples of violations in the application of high discipline:
Not trying to make the trial run according to a predetermined schedule.
Not considering all the arguments of the parties and the facts of the trial in making a decision.
BASIC PRINCIPLES
(10 RULES OF BEHAVIOR)
9. Humble behavior
Awareness of the limitations of one's abilities, far from perfection and avoiding any form of
arrogance. Humility will encourage the formation of a realistic attitude, want to open up to continue to
learn, appreciate the opinions of others, develop a tolerant attitude, and realize simplicity, full of
gratitude and sincerity in carrying out the task.
10. Be professional
Professional means a moral attitude based on the determination to carry out the work chosen with sincerity,
supported by expertise on the basis of knowledge, skills and broad insight. Professional attitudes will
encourage the formation of individuals who always maintain and maintain the quality of work, and strive to
increase knowledge and performance, so as to achieve the highest quality of work, effective and efficient.
Supervision of Judge's obedience in implementing the code of ethics and professional guidelines of the
Judge is divided into two, namely:
1. Internal Supervision (Functional)
Supreme Court
The Honorary Council of Judges formed by IKAHI
2. External Supervision
Judicial Commission
EXAMINATION PROCESS OF VIOLATION
Sanctions in violating the Code of Ethics & Conduct OF Judges are divided into three types, namely:
1. Mild Mild sanctions consist of; verbal, written and dissatisfied statements.
2. Moderate Moderate sanctions consist of delaying the KGB(Periodic Salary Increase) for a
maximum of 1 year, decreasing the KGB for a maximum of 1 year, delaying the promotion of a
maximum of 1 year, non-hammer judges at the latest 6 months, transfer to other courts with lower
classes, cancellation or suspension.
3. Severe Severe sanctions consist of exemption from office, non-hammer judge more than 6 months
and a maximum of 2 years, lower level demotion of no more than 3 years, permanent termination
with retirement rights and non-respectful dismissal.
OBSERVATION RESULTS
RELEVANCE OF CODE OF ETHICS NOWADAYS
The Code of Ethics and Conduct of Judges made in 2009 and the sanctions in them are relevant or not in
nowadays depending on each individual. If peoples said that it is irrelevant to the present time then it wasn’t
right, that’s because every regulation including Code of Ethics & Conduct of Judges will be relevance
nowadays as long as there’s an Akhlakul Karimah or Morals and Character inside the Judges.
Although in fact from year to year the violation of the code of ethics has indeed increased and seems to be
irrelevant to the society but that does not mean that the code of ethics is not in line with the times, to
overcome this problem actually the Supreme Court has carried out several innovations to reduce code of
ethics violations such as :
The responsibility of the leader & appointed a role model
Legal assistance "NO", severe punishment "YES"
Integrity check
COMMENT FROM JUDGE AT PTA SEMARANG
ABOUT CODE OF ETHICS
The Code of Ethics and Judges Behavior Guidelines stipulated in the Joint Decree of the Chief of the Supreme
Court and the Judicial Commission lists 10 basic principles of the Code of Ethics and the Judicial Code of Conduct
is enough to overcome the problem of violations of the code of ethics in Indonesia., it’s only need to be sharpened.
The Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of Judges also doesn’t need any additional or reduction to the items in
the regulation, but further details in the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of the Judge need to be detailed,
because only the general meaning of the code of ethics varies in the regulation. If the 10 basic principles of the
Code of Ethics and the Code of Conduct have been further detailed, this will ease the burden of the High Judge in
the Semarang High Court, who rarely gets cases and usually only have document trial only and conducts guidance
and supervision.
CASE DISCUSSION
1 2
The Honorary Court of Justice (MKH) The hearing reaches results with a decision of
dismissed the judge of the Jambi State 'permanent termination of retirement rights' to the
Administrative Court with the initials EP because it reported judge as recommended by the initial
was proven to have an affair with a woman who
sanctions submitted by KY. In consideration of
was not his wife. EP dismissal was decided at the
MKH hearing by the Judicial Commission and the
MKH, EP judges were considered to damage the
Supreme Court in the Supreme Court building on image of the judiciary, damage the lives of other
Tuesday, October 19, 2017. people, and have the potential to commit disgraceful
acts because they twice cheated on women who
were not his wives.
CASE DISCUSSION