FACTS: -The appellant, appealed for the dismissal of the case on the basis of the application on the Supreme Court’s decision from “People vs. Lucero” and “People vs. Macarandang” respectively. -That the appellant, on or about 9:00 p.m., the 5th day of September, 1964, in the población, Municipality of Batangas, Province of Batangas, Philippines was caught and charged with “Illegal possession of firearms and ammunition. -He claimed to be entitled to exoneration, although he had no license or permit, he had been appointed as a “secret agent”by the Provincial Governor of Batangas and an appointment as “Confidential Agent” by PC Provincial Commander. ISSUE: -Whether or not the appellant should be acquitted on the basis of the Supreme Court’s rulings on the cases of Macarandang and Lucero. RULING: - Stare Decisis doctrine embodies the legal maxim that a principle or rule of law which has been established by the decision of a court controlling jurisdiction will be followed in other cases involving a similar situation. -Appellant was acquitted based on the doctrine that was applied on the Macarandang and Lucero cases.