|





 

 




 








 








°°

°°
  

 Anil Philip
Annmary George
Pravin Pawar
Ren Thampi
Sudipa Bhattacharya
Surya Kutty
Sharon John
 4
 


   

 




 
 

 

4
 

4
  
 


4
  
  


m  


m



 
 

 
 The CASE
Mr. Thakur was not very open to his colleagues.
However, he was being considered for the post as he was
a very ambitious person and always completed targets
effectively. He was assigned a very creative and energetic
team with very innovative ideas. However, he never
appreciated any of their ideas as he already had a blue
print in his mind of what he wanted the end product to
be. He got very aggressive at the team members if they
did not work according to his orders.
 The CASE - a

He gave them unreasonable deadlines which demanded
them to work 24*7. The team members were very
disappointed as they had hardly any contribution to the
final design and were also worried about whether they
would be able to meet the deadlines. They tried to convey
this to him but he got extremely defensive and failed to
help them wherever required. But he was sure that his
design was the best and could not be rejected. He gave
them a presentation on the design created by him and
then allocated jobs to them according to his will.
 The CASE - a

Ú
 
  !
  


   
 
   "
#
  $
 
 

 

 

  "
%

    



 

 





  "
& 
 ' 

 $



 




 

   "
$
  Ú  
 "
 The CASE
Mr. Kumar was very thrilled that he was given such an
opportunity and wanted his design to be selected. His
focus was mainly on creating a design with a difference
and no faults. He targeted submitting the design within 20
days. However, he believed that the members of his group
were confident and extremely efficient. He delegated
various tasks according to their field of excellence. He
always planned for any unforeseen problems and had
alternative plans ready. However, in case of any lapse in
terms of work he never took responsibility for it. He had a
bias towards economically stronger people.
 The CASE
$

 (



  
 






"
#




 (











 





) 
"


 !





"

  *



"
 

 +
 



"
 þ




|,

-
 







)

"
 *"."+
|,





"
 *"%"*
|'
 





"
 /" ("0
|,


"
 /" $" 

|,
"
*""1

==

==


==



,'$%'&(



%Ú$,"




,'$%'&(#* 




,'$%'&(#* 




 





 





)

"

(



 




(



 






 þ


 



þ+
,""

ïohn F. Kennedy - Former U.S. George W. Bush - Former U.S.

President President
 þ


 



þ,""

Barack Obama - U.S. President Chanda Kochar - ICICI Chairman

Õ


  
 
    
 

|


 


 
|
 

 

 




 

$ 
2$


3, 
4
% 
,2*


3
% 
 ,2*


3

44


! 

2,
0!
3#


 
4
!
Behavioral Approach
Trait Approach
Situational Approach
Contingency Approach
Life-cycle Theory
TECHNICAL HUMAN

BEHAVIORAL APPROACH
(3 Types of Skills)

CONCEPTUAL
 

 !"

IOWA leadership studies

OHIO state leadership studies
Early MICHIGAN studies on Leadership
Styles
Managerial Grid
 ! !
·K
    

      
 
 
·     
 
 BORN AND NOT MADE MADE..

6    K    

  

 
  


   Ê

  

[

A== 
 
  

     
A== 
A==   
     
A==  
  


   
A==   
  
!   



 
  
 

[
A==     
     

A==
   

 
 

A==
   
  
A==     
  


! ! !

A_
!       
  

  
   
         
A"
   
  
 
  

  

 
A# 
  
       
 
    
  

 #$ !

A" 

  
 
 
      

   $ 
   !
A%   & '
A%  
  
    (
 (

A)     *
      
 $ $
´Paul Hersey and Blanchard
´Based on situational approach
´Low level of relationship orientation
with high task good in early stages
 þ


  
þ

Instructions:
 +
      ,     -
 
  
. )




   
   
 
    

  )   
   
  
      . (
/
  
 
 012  
  
[  3 4 4 3 .  4 3  

 
  5 33 X 0.2 = 6.6.
3 6 



  
 -
  

7    16*1_6 %
  
)"K8 %
     
Point:2 (  


     



  _
  [
Impoverished
Authoritarian
Socialite
Team Leadership
Middle-of-the-Road
 þ


  
þ
h
 
þ
h


I ris (1,1 t 4,4): á       
4 t rit ri ( l -1t 4 s - 5 t 9): 
 
á    
K ci lit (
l - 5 t 9 s 1-4): 
   
á  
þ
 
 rs i
( , t 9,9): 
    
 
il - f-t -
 (5,5):        
 á

/ 
          
  

!
           

      
   
     
     
    
   
 |, 

 




þ