You are on page 1of 20

R R 


 

  R

 
R
R 
R  
 

| |


||  |
  
RR 


 !
¢ Inflation is the condition of a ¢ Inflation erodes the purchasing
persistently rising price level. power of money.

¢ Price stability does not mean zero ¢ There is diminution of real value
inflation. of savings as real interest rates
turn negative.
¢ For an emerging market economy
like India, an inflation rate of 4% ¢ Persistently high inflation alters
per annum is tolerable. inflationary expectations.

¢ Study of inflation is important as ¢ High inflation aggravates


costs of inflation are significant. inequality.




R 
¢ ccording to Milton Friedman-
V  
    
      
¢ pong run inflation cannot occur without a persistent increase in the money
supply.
¢ In the short term or medium term inflation can take place due to a negative
supply shock or expansionary fiscal policy.
¢ Inflation can be V   or V   by nature. Both result from
an activist stabilization policy to promote high employment.
¢  budget deficit can be the source of a sustained inflation only if it is
persistent and if the government finances it by creating money rather than
by issuing bonds to the public.

R  
R 

  
¢ ontractionary fiscal policy is a measure to control inflation only in the
short run.
¢ pong-run inflation can be checked only by decreasing the money supply.
¢ nother method to check inflation is to freeze wages (an anti-trade union
policy) and prices (an anti-trust or anti-monopoly policy).
¢ Inflation Targeting has been adopted by many countries to achieve price
stability. But in a country like India with recurrent supply shocks this
policy is not viable.
¢ Hyperinflation is defined as an extremely rapid increase in the price level.
Its obvious cause is the excessive growth in the money supply, mainly due
to huge government budget deficits.

 
R 
]PI is the headline inflation measure
due to high frequency of data availability.
Divergence between PI & ]PI:
¢ Food prices have a higher weightage
(46-49%) in the PI measures than in
]PI (22-26%).
¢ Prices of services are included in PI ] 
(wt: 12-24%), not ]PI.
¢ Metal prices are included in ]PI, not
|
PI.
¢ Differences in the actual price for
 
similar commodities at wholesale and
retail levels often prevails.
]
Inspite of the divergence among
inflation indices they follow a similar

path over long time spans.
   
R  
 

"
¢ Inflation was demand-driven.

¢ Rise in prices of primary products
¢ It was characterized by a steep
increase in fuel prices. due to adverse (sectoral) supply
shock.
¢ The roots of this inflation were
¢ Inflation in other prices was due
traced to international supply
shocks rather than domestic to booming aggregate demand.
overheating. ¢ By the end of the year ]PI
¢ The ]PI inflation was 6.5%, inflation subsided to 5.7% [
fuel price inflation was 10.1%   

      
 
 
    !"    
 
R  
R 

  

|# !$!%#&'#!$(&# )$#
¢ The ash Reserve Ratio (RR)
was raised from 4.5% by 0.25 #!$# )$#
percentage point both in ¢ mrea prices were left unchanged.
September & October 2004 by the ¢ The extent of hike in the
same magnitude.
administered prices of coal &
¢ There was a hike in the reverse mineral oil was less than their
repo rate to 4.75%.
price increases abroad.
¢ Excise & custom duties on
petroleum products were cut
substantially.
¢ uts in tariffs on vegetable oil.
¢ Increase in the quantum of free-
sale sugar.
 
R  
R 
  
 
# )$# !)$*'!''+$#  # )$# !)$*'!''+$# 
+$&$($!# '',$)!)$&&-!#
¢ Imports of wheat, pulses, oilseeds, ¢ ustom duties on inorganic

maize and sugar was permitted. chemicals, non-ferrous metals and


¢ Ban on export of wheat, pulses
cement was reduced.
and skimmed milk powder. ¢ ustom duties on petrol and

¢ Increased supply of wheat under


diesel were reduced from 10% to
FI¶s public distribution system. 7.5% and their prices were raised
by Rs 2 & Re 1 respectively.
¢  hundred rupee hike in the
minimum support price for wheat. |# !$!%#'#!$(# )$#
¢ Hike in the reverse repo rate from
¢ Imposition of bans on futures
market trading in wheat, tur and 5.25% to 6%
urad. ¢ Hike in repo rate by 150 basis
points to 7.75%.
¢ Hike in RR from 5% to 6.50%.
   
R    

  


¢ External supply side shocks were ¢ During July 2009, y-o-y ]PI
the key drivers of inflation during inflation was (-) 1.17% on
this period. account of high base last year.
¢ Inflation was triggered largely by ¢ Major contributors to annual
a sharp increase in the prices of inflation were food items i.e.
basic metals and mineral oils. inflation emanated from domestic
¢ The headline inflation decelerated sources.
from a peak of 12.91% on ugust ¢ There was a decline in the prices
2, 2008 to 0.84% at end- March of mineral oil, iron & steel, edible
2009. oils etc.
¢ India witnessed a sharp increase
in ]PI inflation from a negative
terrain during June-ugust 2009
to 9.9% by February 2010.
¢ The increase in PI is even higher
in the range of 14.9%- 16.9%.
   !"

# )$# -+!#--)$',!.#$  +#$-


¢ The repo rate was reduced by 425 basis points to 4.75%.
¢ The reverse repo rate was reduced by 275 basis points to 3.25%.
¢ The RR was reduced by a cumulative 400 basis points to 5%.
¢ Institution of several sector-specific liquidity facilities.
¢ Establishment of a forex swap facility.
¢ RBI also allowed restructuring of stressed assets by banks in order to
increase the flow of credit for productive purposes.
¢ Reduction in the Statutory piquidity Ratio (SpR) from 25% to 24% of
NDTp (Net Demand and Time piabilities).
 
R  
R 

  "#
( !'#!.#|
Policy stance was shifted from
V    to V (&# )$# -+!#-*(!.#|
     -)$',!.#$#%#$(+#$-
The stance of monetary policy was: ¢ RR of banks was raised to 5.75%
¢ To anchor inflation expectations. from 5% of NDTp.
¢ ctively manage liquidity. ¢ Increase in policy reverse repo and
¢ To ensure that credit demand of repo rates by 25 basis points each in
productive sector was adequately March 2010.
met.
¢ SpR was restored to 25% of NDTp.
In view of the rising food inflation RBI
announced the first phase of exit from V #$%&  
expansionary monetary policy in       
October 2009. 
    
 R 


 
  


¢ s per the theoretical discussion, the main determinants of the overall inflation
in the economy are: Government budget deficit, M1 (currency + current a/c
deposits), gricultural(foodgrain) production, GDP & ]PI of fuel, power, light
& lubricant (viz,]PI of fuel).
¢ The question I want to address: ] [    
              '
    %%%&$%
¢ In order to avoid µSpurious Regression¶, time series properties of each variable
must match.
¢ The dependent variable being ]PI inflation, y-o-y & log values of each
variable is subject to unit root analysis.
¢ For feasibility of solution, monthly data on each variable has been considered
(the variables GDP and foodgrain production have been ignored as monthly
data is unavailable on them).
R RRRR

R R  

 R  

= | 

,/]  
,/0 ,/] 1)#0

&&-!# 0
Xis stationary at first Xis stationary at first
Xis stationary at first
difference. difference.
difference.
i.e. I (1) ] i.e. I (1) ]
i.e. I (1) ]

 
R  RR 
R
R 

Estimated dlog (]PI-ll ommodities) =
0.001026 (±) 0.002961 dlogM1 + 0.281012 dlog (]PI of fuel)
(0.000449) (0.039707) (0.049119)
X2.288623] X-0.074580] X5.721007]

( )- standard error; X ]- t statistic


¢ dlogM1 is statistically insignificant. dlog (]PI of Fuel) is statistically
significant.
¢ No multicollinearity problem.
¢ No autocorrelation problem. Therefore the estimated coefficients are
efficient.
¢ Goodness of fit Xi.e. correlation coefficient between actual and estimated
values of dlog (]PI-ll ommodities)] is 0.451 which is quite good.
V #(        
)  *
 R
R  RR

¢ 2- Step Engle Granger Test has been used to test for the presence of long
run relationship amongst the variables.
¢ Suppose that y(t) ~I (1) and x(t) ~I(1). Then y(t) and x(t) are said to be
cointegrated if there exists a ȕ such that y(t) ± ȕ x(t) is I (0) i.e., estimated
u(t) must be I (0). This is denoted by saying y(t) and x(t) are I (1, 1).
¢  cointegrating (long- run) relationship is present only between log (]PI-
ll ommodities) and log (M1).
¢ This is in conformity with the classical view that in the long run overall
]PI inflation is determined by the money supply alone.
¢ In other words in the absence of monetary accommodation non-monetary
forces have only a transitory affect on the prices.
 R 


 
]henthe
]hen inflation is dueprices
administered to some sectoralorcost
of petroleum push,
other but
products
Since a major
arethere
below reason
istheir adduced
international
evidence of excess bycapacity
levels, the
shouldcentral
the bank for
or government
demand
monetary
raise them when
deficiency tightening irrespective
the overall
elsewhere ininflation isof
the economy thebut
low, sources
keep the
should themof
unchanged
inflation
central or lower
bank thethem
istake need iffor
recourse the containing
general
to monetarypriceµinflation
level exhibits
tightening
a strong upward trend
expectations¶, it isdue to sectoraltoorascertain
important macroeconomic
the
at all?
factors?
]hy should price increases such
determinants of expectations.
(following, say, a one-off
Doesincrease
not the analysis
in crude or diagnosis
prices) whichofreflect
inflation in terms to
adjustment of athe
]hat is the of
behaviour
economic
new equilibrium
rationale
pricessituation
of particular
and are
of freezing
commodities
some
or product
not of a continuing
prices
groups
nature or against
go trying
be regarded as thetofundamental
curb Do
inflation? their
such increase
approach for
of the
price increases
economic purposes
theory? Is of
require controlling
itany
not necessary
policy forinflation?
response? this purpose to use
a macroeconomic framework?
RBI states conflicting objectives- it wants the banks to
be profitable and at the same time instructs them to
RBI in its policycredit
advance stancetostates
the that it aims
priority to maintain
sectors of the a
pastly, monetary tools have proved to be more
balance
economy. between
Both growth
these and inflation.
objectives cannot This
be is again
achieved
effective in economies with greater financial
a self-conflicting objective. In order to achieve
simultaneously.
inclusion.
long run growth the economy may have to suffer
In RBI primarily
the context acts as an ENBpER- theanalysis
some amount of inflation in the short run.shows
of the Indian economy, empirical measures
ataken by theofRBI
high degree duringofthe
persistence crisis period
inflation, (2008-
especially in the
2009)
case onlyand
of food Is ]PI superior
µenable/allow¶ credit
edible oil groups. to other
expansion.
There price
is an urgentThis
need
to addressdoes
however notindices
the issue imply forthere
of structural
that purposes
supply of
constraints,
was µactual¶
initiating
particularly in agriculture,
credit anti-inflationary
so that these do not become a
expansion.
binding constraint in the long run, making the task of
fiscal or monetary measures?
inflation-management more difficult.
R  

1 |1  232
 2
21 | ]23 
 |1   ù Nominal interest rate depends on the
expected real return of investors,
ù Divergence between ]PI and PI expected inflation rate and the
has accentuated since early 2008 inflation risk premium.
¢ This underscores the need for a ù One way of mitigating the inflation
representative measure of risk premium is to issue µ 
inflation for better articulation of  + , ¶ with an assured
monetary policy. real return in the range of 2-3%.
¢  broad based PI for the country ù Such bonds if properly structured
as a whole, including both would provide a complete hedge
services and manufacturing against inflation & protect the long-
products, has greater relevance for time savers & investors from the
monetary policy formulation. inflation risk.
  

¢ Right now, the RBI seems to be concentrating only on the demand-end of


inflation; as a result the entire perspective of supply is completely ignored.
¢ Inflation may also be curtailed if the supply is bolstered to meet the demands of
the people.
¢ It is sufficiently clear that the reason that the inflation occurs is because the
economic status and mindsets of the people of India are advancing.
¢ ]hy should this rise in demand be considered as a disadvantage?
¢ The problem here is that the country¶s infrastructure is not capable of meeting
these requirements.
¢ But surprisingly, instead of giving any attention to the supply factors, the RBI is
stifling the requirements of the consumers and is attempting to create an illusion
that there is no demand for the products.
¢ The situation is perfectly described by the following statement:
V-   .     

 
     + 

You might also like