Professional Documents
Culture Documents
R
R
R
R
| |
|| |
RR
!
¢ Inflation is the condition of a ¢ Inflation erodes the purchasing
persistently rising price level. power of money.
¢ Price stability does not mean zero ¢ There is diminution of real value
inflation. of savings as real interest rates
turn negative.
¢ For an emerging market economy
like India, an inflation rate of 4% ¢ Persistently high inflation alters
per annum is tolerable. inflationary expectations.
"
¢ Inflation was demand-driven.
¢ Rise in prices of primary products
¢ It was characterized by a steep
increase in fuel prices. due to adverse (sectoral) supply
shock.
¢ The roots of this inflation were
¢ Inflation in other prices was due
traced to international supply
shocks rather than domestic to booming aggregate demand.
overheating. ¢ By the end of the year ]PI
¢ The ]PI inflation was 6.5%, inflation subsided to 5.7% [
fuel price inflation was 10.1%
!"
R
R
|# !$!%#&'#!$(&# )$#
¢ The ash Reserve Ratio (RR)
was raised from 4.5% by 0.25 #!$# )$#
percentage point both in ¢ mrea prices were left unchanged.
September & October 2004 by the ¢ The extent of hike in the
same magnitude.
administered prices of coal &
¢ There was a hike in the reverse mineral oil was less than their
repo rate to 4.75%.
price increases abroad.
¢ Excise & custom duties on
petroleum products were cut
substantially.
¢ uts in tariffs on vegetable oil.
¢ Increase in the quantum of free-
sale sugar.
R
R
# )$# !)$*'!''+$# # )$# !)$*'!''+$#
+$&$($!# '',$)!)$&&-!#
¢ Imports of wheat, pulses, oilseeds, ¢ ustom duties on inorganic
=|
,/]
,/0 ,/] 1)#0
&&-!# 0
Xis stationary at first Xis stationary at first
Xis stationary at first
difference. difference.
difference.
i.e. I (1) ] i.e. I (1) ]
i.e. I (1) ]
R
RR
R
R
Estimated dlog (]PI-ll ommodities) =
0.001026 (±) 0.002961 dlogM1 + 0.281012 dlog (]PI of fuel)
(0.000449) (0.039707) (0.049119)
X2.288623] X-0.074580] X5.721007]
¢ 2- Step Engle Granger Test has been used to test for the presence of long
run relationship amongst the variables.
¢ Suppose that y(t) ~I (1) and x(t) ~I(1). Then y(t) and x(t) are said to be
cointegrated if there exists a ȕ such that y(t) ± ȕ x(t) is I (0) i.e., estimated
u(t) must be I (0). This is denoted by saying y(t) and x(t) are I (1, 1).
¢ cointegrating (long- run) relationship is present only between log (]PI-
ll ommodities) and log (M1).
¢ This is in conformity with the classical view that in the long run overall
]PI inflation is determined by the money supply alone.
¢ In other words in the absence of monetary accommodation non-monetary
forces have only a transitory affect on the prices.
R
]henthe
]hen inflation is dueprices
administered to some sectoralorcost
of petroleum push,
other but
products
Since a major
arethere
below reason
istheir adduced
international
evidence of excess bycapacity
levels, the
shouldcentral
the bank for
or government
demand
monetary
raise them when
deficiency tightening irrespective
the overall
elsewhere ininflation isof
the economy thebut
low, sources
keep the
should themof
unchanged
inflation
central or lower
bank thethem
istake need iffor
recourse the containing
general
to monetarypriceµinflation
level exhibits
tightening
a strong upward trend
expectations¶, it isdue to sectoraltoorascertain
important macroeconomic
the
at all?
factors?
]hy should price increases such
determinants of expectations.
(following, say, a one-off
Doesincrease
not the analysis
in crude or diagnosis
prices) whichofreflect
inflation in terms to
adjustment of athe
]hat is the of
behaviour
economic
new equilibrium
rationale
pricessituation
of particular
and are
of freezing
commodities
some
or product
not of a continuing
prices
groups
nature or against
go trying
be regarded as thetofundamental
curb Do
inflation? their
such increase
approach for
of the
price increases
economic purposes
theory? Is of
require controlling
itany
not necessary
policy forinflation?
response? this purpose to use
a macroeconomic framework?
RBI states conflicting objectives- it wants the banks to
be profitable and at the same time instructs them to
RBI in its policycredit
advance stancetostates
the that it aims
priority to maintain
sectors of the a
pastly, monetary tools have proved to be more
balance
economy. between
Both growth
these and inflation.
objectives cannot This
be is again
achieved
effective in economies with greater financial
a self-conflicting objective. In order to achieve
simultaneously.
inclusion.
long run growth the economy may have to suffer
In RBI primarily
the context acts as an ENBpER- theanalysis
some amount of inflation in the short run.shows
of the Indian economy, empirical measures
ataken by theofRBI
high degree duringofthe
persistence crisis period
inflation, (2008-
especially in the
2009)
case onlyand
of food Is ]PI superior
µenable/allow¶ credit
edible oil groups. to other
expansion.
There price
is an urgentThis
need
to addressdoes
however notindices
the issue imply forthere
of structural
that purposes
supply of
constraints,
was µactual¶
initiating
particularly in agriculture,
credit anti-inflationary
so that these do not become a
expansion.
binding constraint in the long run, making the task of
fiscal or monetary measures?
inflation-management more difficult.
R
1 |1 232
2
21 |]23
|1 ù Nominal interest rate depends on the
expected real return of investors,
ù Divergence between ]PI and PI expected inflation rate and the
has accentuated since early 2008 inflation risk premium.
¢ This underscores the need for a ù One way of mitigating the inflation
representative measure of risk premium is to issue µ
inflation for better articulation of
+
, ¶ with an assured
monetary policy. real return in the range of 2-3%.
¢ broad based PI for the country ù Such bonds if properly structured
as a whole, including both would provide a complete hedge
services and manufacturing against inflation & protect the long-
products, has greater relevance for time savers & investors from the
monetary policy formulation. inflation risk.