Professional Documents
Culture Documents
reconstruction of Fe-S
cluster biogenesis in yeast
Rui Alves
Ciencies Mediques Basiques
Universitat de Lleida
Introduction
02/17/11 2
Objective of the research line
Sequence
A 1
Homology
Protein A C 0.9
… …
analysis
Target Homologue in BHomologue in
0.11 …
Genome Genome 1? Genome 2?
…N …
A Y Calculate
B Proteins (ANand C) that are present
Y
…
and absent…in the same set of
C genomes are coincidence index
Y likely to be involved
N in the same …
process and therefore
… interact … … …
D
If structures already exist, even easier
O as the
OPTIMIZE C
modeling part can be skipped
K
… C E+F
d ( C)
≈ α ... − β Ah1 C h 2 ...
dt
g<0 inhibits flux
g=0 no influence on flux
02/17/11
g>0 activates flux 8
A reconstruction method
02/17/11 9
Fe-S clusters
e-
e-
S
Protein Protein
Fe Fe
Cysteine Cysteine
S
What is known about FeSC
biogenesis
02/17/11 11
Phenotype of FeSC machinery
deletion mutants
FeSC Dependent
Fe Level Protein Activity
WT ∆ WT ∆
Fe Accumulates FeSC dependent protein
activity is impaired
FeSC biogenesis in a nutshell
Fe S
Scaffold Scaffold Scaffold Scaffold
Synthesis FeSC
(S)
FeSC
Transfer
Holo-P (T)
Apo-P
Damaged
FeSC
Repair
(R) Holo-P
The proteins and their function
02/17/11 14
Grx5 is involved in FeSC
biogenesis in S. cerevisiae
Glutaredoxin
Mediates glutathionylation state of Cys
residues
May mediate protein-protein disulfide bridge
02/17/11 16
Possible partners of Grx5 in
FeSC biogenesis
Isu1 Bibliography
Docking
Isa1 Phylogeny+
Docking
Isa2
Nfs1
Grx5
02/17/11 17
Possible roles of Grx5 in FeSC
biogenesis:
regulation of glutathionylation
S
HSGlutathione
P P S-SG
Grx5
02/17/11 18
Possible roles of Grx5 in FeSC
Biogenesis:
Recovery of dead-end complex
Scaffold SH HS Nfs1
Grx5
Scaffold S S Nfs1
Studying the effect of Grx5:
the protocol
1 1
1000s of
0.5 0.5 simulations
0.1 0.1
WT ∆ Not Recovering
Belli et al. MBC 13:1109 recovering Nfs1 and
Nfs1 and Scaffold
Scaffold
gene deletion on protein
activity if Grx5 recovers Nfs1
activity
Fe Levels
1000s of
simulations
1 1
WT ∆ Not Recovering
Belli et al. MBC 13:1109 recovering Nfs1 and
Nfs1and Scaffold
Scaffold
Conclusions:
Possible Modes of
action for Grx5
Reproducing
9 experimental No 6
phenotype?
Yes 3 Nfs1-Scaffold
Prediction:
Grx5 modulates Nfs1 and Scaffold activity/Interactions
Grx5 interacts with scaffold in
two-hybrid assay
02/17/11 24
Arh1-Yah1 proteins are
involved in FeSC biogenesis in
S. cerevisiae
Arh1-Yah1
Ferredoxin Reductase – Ferredoxin
processes
Isa2
Nfu1
02/17/11 26
Possible modes of Arh1-Yah1
action
Arh1/Yah1
Fe S
Scaffold Scaffold Scaffold Scaffold
Synthesis FeSC
(S)
FeSC Arh1/Yah1
Transfer
Holo-P
(T)
Apo-P
Damaged
FeSC
Repair
(R) Holo-P
Arh1/Yah1
Model reproduces gene
deletion effect on FeSC
dependent activity if Arh1-
FeSC Dependent Protein Activity
Yah1 act on ST
1
1000s of
simulations
0.2
WT ∆ T R S
Li et al. JBC 276:1503 RS ST
Lange et al. PNAS 97:1050 RST
RT
accumulation upon gene
deletion if Arh1-Yah1 act on
ST
Fe Levels
1000s of
simulations
1
WT ∆ S R S
Li et al. JBC 276:1503 T RT
Lange et al. PNAS 97:1050 ST
RS RST
Conclusions for Arh1-Yah1:
Possible Modes of Arh1-
Yah1 action
Reproducing
7 experimental No 5
phenotype?
S
Yes 2
ST
Arh1-Yah1 act on ST steps of FeSC biogenesis
Consistent with results from
Li et al. JBC 276:1503
Lange et al. PNAS 97:1050
Ssq1-Jac1-Mge1 proteins are
involved in FeSC biogenesis in
S. cerevisiae
Ssq1-Jac1-Mge1
Chaperone – Co-Chaperone – Nucleotide Release
Factor
These proteins help fold-stabilize other proteins
1
1000s of
simulations
0.2
WT ∆ Stability Fold
02/17/11 32
accumulation upon gene
deletion if chaperones act on
stability
Fe Levels
1000s of
simulations
1
WT ∆ Stability Fold
Conclusions:
Possible Modes of Ssq1-
Jac1-Mge1 action
Reproducing
3 experimental No 1
phenotype?
Fold
Yes 2 Stability/Fold
1
1000s of
simulations
0.2
WT ∆ R S
RS
Model reproduces Fe
accumulation upon gene
deletion if Nfs1 acts on S
Fe Levels
1000s of
simulations
1
WT ∆ R S
RS
Conclusions:
Possible Modes of Nfs1
action
Reproducing
3 experimental No 1
phenotype?
Yes 2 S
SR
Nfs1 needs only to act on synthesis but can also act on
repair of FeSC
Summary
Arh1-Yah1 acts on Synthesis and transfer of FeSC
02/17/11 40
Grx5 is predicted to dock
facing the Nfs1 active center
Active
center Grx5
Cys residue
Alternative
Grx5
Binding
Alternative solutions
Grx5
Binding Nfs1 dimer
solution
Active
center Nfs1
Cys residue
02/17/11 41
Predictions for Grx5:
02/17/11 42
Possible Modes of Chaperone
Action
Fe S
Scaffold Scaffold Scaffold Scaffold
Synthesis FeSC
(S)
FeSC Ssq1/Jac1/Mge1
Transfer
Holo-P
(T)
Apo-P
Damaged
FeSC
Repair
(R) Holo-P
02/17/11 43
Possible modes of Nfs1 action
Nfs1
Fe S
Scaffold Scaffold Scaffold Scaffold
Synthesis FeSC
(S)
FeSC
Transfer
Holo-P
(T)
Apo-P
Damaged
FeSC
Repair
(R) Holo-P
02/17/11
Nfs1 44
Possible partners of Nfs1 in
FeSC biogenesis
Isu1
Isu2 Docking
Docking +
Isa1 Phylogeny
Bibliography +
Isa2 Docking +
Phylogeny
Nfu1 Nfs1
02/17/11 45
Metabolic Reconstruction:
FeSC biogenesis
The view from here
Test the predictions
Rui Alves
Ciencies Mediques Basiques
Universitat de Lleida
Outline
Metabolic Network Reconstruction
Iron-Sulfur Cluster Biogenesis Pathway in S.
cerevisiae.
Pathway Evolution
Amino
acid biosynthetic pathways protein
composition
Design Principles
Regulatory Design in Networks
Two Component Systems
• Mono-functionality vs. Bi-functionality of Sensor Proteins
Studying an organism
…
ACTG…
S
tres >Dna
s MAACTG…
t
High cognate aa content in biosynthetic pathway
aa Protein
levels Synthesis
t
The Low Cognate Bias
Hypothesis
Thus, we hypothesize that evolution would lead to the
selection of amino-acid biosynthetic enzymes that have a
relatively low content of their cognate amino acid. We
call this the “cognate-bias hypothesis”.
Test Cases:
E. coli
S. typhimurium
B. subtilis
Calculating the bias
aa- Calculate aa
biosynthesis composition
proteins
KEGG
Rank w/respect
Metacyc Protein to proteome
Sequences
P(aa)
Literature
Control
High
GeneBank Groups:
1
Proteome Av.
Specific 0.5
genome Growing cells
aa composition
… 0
Low
There is low cognate bias in aa
biosynthesis
Positive correlation between
relative cognate aa composition
and specific activity of proteins
× =
Specific activity Protein copies aa synthesis
× =
Specific activity Protein copies aa synthesis
P<0.003
Negative correlation between
relative cognate aa composition
and number of proteins in
pathway
Average aa
content
+
++
+++
++++
1 2 3 4
Activ
e
Cente
r
02/17/11 60
Exceptions to the
cognate bias hypothesis
Functional Reasons
ActiveCenters (Phe, Tyr)
Dimerization Domains (Asp)
02/17/11 61
Low cognate bias is present in
organisms with the full
complement of pathways
Environmental effects
in cognate bias
The relative abundance of amino acid should influence the
pressure to keep a low cognate amino acid content in
biosynthetic pathways
02/17/11 63
Differences in amino acid
composition of distinct habitats
Soil Gut
Low amounts Arg, Glu, Lys, Low amounts Ala, Asp, Gly,
Trp Tyr Ser, Thr
Intermediate Ala, Asp, Thr High amounts Arg, Glu, Lys,
amounts Trp, Tyr
High amounts Gly, Ser
Rank of Cognate
Bias
02/17/11 66
Conclusions:
The low cognate bias hypothesis is supported by:
Analysis of protein composition
Analysis of protein specific activity
Analysis of pathway length
S* R S* R
Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2
... ...
A A
Q Q
Q
Physiological
Predictions
Bifunctional design lowers Q2 signal
amplification
prefered when cross-talk is undesirable
Bifunctional Monofunctional
Sensor Sensor
25 monofunctional sensors
Alves & Savageau 2003 Mol. Microbiol. 48:25
Two Component
Systems – the view from
here
Independent phosphatase activity (directly
dependent on HK vs. Not directly dependent
on HK)
Analysis of Phosphorelays
TCS vs. Eukaryotic signal transduction
Alternative designs of TCS (Nar system)
Metabolic Reconstruction
Summary
Development and integration of computational
tools to address quantitative biological problems
Analyze aa
biosyntesis Analyze more
and enzyme TCS designs
networks
evolution
Grx5 interacts with Scaffold in
Two-Hybrid assay
Two-hybrid analysis of the interaction between Grx5 and Scaffold. Numbers over bars indicate the beta-
galactosidase activity (Miller units) in cultures of S. cerevisiae cells co-transformed with plasmids pGBT9
and pACT2 vectors alone, or derivatives expressing the respective Gal4 fusion proteins with Grx5, Scaffold,
and two proteins known to interact. Results are the mean of three independent experiments.
ATP binding domain important in
functionality of sensor
…SSQIE… Sensor with known structure
…SSQ-E… Sensor sequence for structure prediction
Differences
in ATP lid
Predicted to be Predicted to be
Bifunctional Monofunctional
Sensor Sensor