Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• But in the given case, it is assumed that there are no real gains from the
merger.
“One of the largest, most critical, and most difficult parts of a business merger
is the successful integration of the enterprise networks of the merger
partners.”
Some key Definitions
Takeover
▫ The transfer of control from one ownership group to another.
Acquisition
▫ The purchase of one firm by another so that ownership transfers
There is no tangible difference between an acquisition and a takeover;
both words can be used interchangeably - the only difference is that
each word carries a slightly different connotation. Typically, takeover is
used to reference a hostile takeover where the company being
acquired is resisting. In contrast, acquisition is frequently used to
describe more friendly acquisitions, or used in conjunction with the
word merger, where both companies are willing to join together.
Merger
▫ The combination of two firms into a new legal entity.
▫ A new company is created.
▫ Both sets of shareholders have to approve the transaction.
Key Definitions …Continued
• Merger through Absorption: An absorption is a combination of two or more
companies into an 'existing company'. All companies except one lose their
identity in such a merger.
▫ For example, absorption of Tata Fertilisers Ltd (TFL) by Tata Chemicals Ltd. (TCL).
TCL, an acquiring company (a buyer), survived after merger while TFL, an acquired
company (a seller), ceased to exist. TFL transferred its assets, liabilities and shares
to TCL.
Horizontal
• A merger in which two firms in the same industry combine.
• Often in an attempt to achieve economies of scale and/or scope.
Vertical
• A merger in which one firm acquires a supplier or another firm that is
closer to its existing customers.
• Often in an attempt to control supply or distribution channels.
Cross-border (International)
• A merger or acquisition involving a domestic and a foreign firm a either
the acquiring or target company.
• Economies of Scale
• Economies of scale are the advantage of large scale production that result in lower
cost per unit produced.
• Tax reasons
• Businesses are always looking for ways to reduce their tax exposure. A firm has large
sums of money lying idle, using these sums to acquire another business that would
not only enhance its operations but would also reduce its tax liability
Reasons for Failure of Mergers and Acquisitions
Size Issues
A mismatch in the size between acquirer and target has been found to
lead to poor acquisition performance. Many acquisitions fail either
because of 'acquisition indigestion' through buying too big targets or
failed to give the smaller acquisitions the time and attention it required
Lack of Research
Acquisition requires gathering a lot of data and information and analyzing
it. It requires extensive research. A carelessly carried out research about
the acquisition causes the destruction of acquirer's wealth
Diversification
Very few firms have the ability to successfully manage the diversified
businesses. Unrelated diversification has been associated with lower
financial performance, lower capital productivity and a higher degree of
variance in performance.
Recent Mergers and acquisitions
• Number of shares
= Earnings of merged firm/Earnings per share
= 700,000/2.67
= 262,172
• Price-earnings ratio
= Price per share/ Earnings per share
= 34.33/2.67
= 12.86
Q.2 How many shares of World enterprises are
exchanged for each share of Wheelrim and Axle?
• Cost of merger
= Shares offered * Market value of shares
after merger – Market value of acquired firm
= 162,172*$34.33 – $5,000,000
= $567,364.76
Q.4 What is the change in the total market value of
the world enterprise shares that were outstanding
before the merger
• Market value of given shares before merger
= $4,000,000
• Market value of given shares after merger
= Number of shares * Price per share
= 100,000*34.33
= $3,433,000
• Therefore, change in market value
= 3,433,000-4,000,000
= $(567000)
Conclusion