Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of Retirement Security
Assets
Pensions/Annuities
60%
Social Security
40%
20% Wages
Social Security: Cash Flow
19
18
Percent of Taxable Payroll
17
16
15
14
2018
13
12
11
10
8
2001 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Year
$5,000
Billions of Dollars
We are here
$4,000
$3,000
$2,000
$1,000
2042
$0
2001 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050
Year
Significant Savings Required at All Income
Levels to Maintain Standard of Living in
Retirement
Pre-Retirement Family $50,000 $80,000 $120,000
Income
Income at 70% replacement level $35,000 $56,000 $84,000
Income from Social Security
(at Full Retirement Age) $20,436 $26,820 $35,364
Income needed from savings and
investments $14,564 $29,180 $48,636
Principal needed at retirement to
generate above income $364,000 $729,500 $1,215,900
(if withdrawn at 4% per year)
Extra needed for average medical $300,000 $300,000 $300,000
costs per couple
TOTAL savings needed for a $664,100 $1,029,500 $1,515,900
secure retirement
Defined-Benefit Pensions Disappearing
% of Wage & Salary Workers Covered by Plan Type, 1981-2001
70%
60% D efin ed B en efit O n ly
40%
30%
20%
10%
0% Source: Alicia H. Munnell, Kevin E. Cahill, and Natalia A. Jivan,
An Issue In Brief, Number 13, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College, September 2003.
1981 1991 2001
Median Amounts in Retirement Accounts
by Age Group, 2001 and 2004
(in thousands of 2004 dollars)
$90
$80
$70 2001
$60 2004
$50
$40
$30
$20
$10
$0
Under 35K. Bucks,35-44
Source: Brian Arthur B. Kennickell, 45-54 55-64
and Kevin B. Moore, “Recent Changes in U.S. 65-74
Family Finances:
Evidence from the 2001 and 2004 Survey of Consumer Finances,” Federal Reserve Bulletin, January, 2006.
75+
I in 4 people
between 45-54
are taking
money out of
401(k)s, IRAs
Personal Saving Rates Have Declined Steadily
for Two Decades
Trends in Personal Saving Rates, 1985-2006
20%
15%
Personal saving (FoF)
Personal saving (NIPA)
10%
Percent of Income
5%
0%
1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Source: Federal Reserve Board, Flow of Funds Accounts, Table F10, Derivation of Measures of Personal Saving, various years.
-5%
Boomers’ Net Worth
2004 figures, include home equity; Boomer ages 42-60 currently
$250,000
$200,000 $179,000
$146,200
$150,000
$118,000
$100,000
$50,000
$0
All Boomers Boomers
Boomers 51-60 42-50
Older Americans are Working Longer
Labor Force Participation Rates for Persons Aged 55 and Older, by Age Group, 1985-2005
70%
62.9%
60%
59.2%
57.2%
55.9%
54.2%
50% 55-64
65-69
70-74
40% 75+
30% 28.3%
24.5%
21.0% 21.8%
20% 18.4%
16.3%
12.5% 13.5%
11.3%
10%
6.4%
4.3% 4.7% 5.3%
0%Source: 0.0%
0.0%
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey, 1985-2005,
accessed at http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/outside.jsp?survey=ln.
1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Options to Strengthen
Social Security . . .
Raise payroll tax ½ percentage point 24%
Include newly-hired State/Local workers 9%
Raise max. wages subject to Soc Sec tax 43%
Gradually raise age of full benefit to 70 38%
Increase calculation period to 38 years 16%
Index benefits for “average longevity” 25%
Reduce benefits for new retirees (by 5%) 26%
Diversify 15% of Trust Fund investments 16%
“Superlative” index the COLA calculation 14%
Raise the earliest eligibility age 10%
Social Security Poll Results
PUBLIC OPEN TO ADEQUATE ADJUSTMENTS
Reform Options Would Consider FAVOR
Increase wage cap to $150,000 81% 71%
Increase FICA ½ percent 72% 59%
Lower benefit formula 10% for 67% 56%
higher income only
Invest small portion (15%) of Trust Fund 54% 40%
100%
20%
40%
60%
80%
0%
(%de
"nd
G ot C
a ar
et pr e
tin ob
g le
m
C ")
ar
e
(%Q Medicare
ho “ua ic
lw k
co ayly
m s"
)
m
(%
un
i
“a
lw
ca
ay
te Medicare
s ")
ur
te w
el
ou l
s ,H
(%
el
“a
pf
Medicare
lw
ul
ay
S
s"
)
ta
C f f
us
om(% t
er"n
Sot a Medicare
lR er p
at (% virob
cele
in “ m
g res ")
Source: 2006 CAHPS Health Plan Survey Chartbook
o f po
CAHPS Health Plan Survey Comparison 2006
H ndi
eang Medicare
lth“9“
Plor “
an10
”)
Medicare
in Patient Satisfaction last 5 years
Medicare beats Commercial Plans
Rise in Health Care Costs per capita
Projected
$10,000
$9,525
$8,000
$6,000 $7,092
$6,697
$4,000
$2,000 $3,469
$0
1993 2004 2006
Source: Health Affairs, Trends, Health Spending Projections, February 2007
2011
NOTES:
Costs for Total Medicare Program
$800 Projection
$600
Billions
$400
$200
$3,000
$2,400
Billions
$1,800
$1,200
$600
$0
Overall Medicare Costs compared to Overall Health Costs
1993 1998 2002 2004 2006 201
Source: CMS, National Health Accounts
Analysis of Cost Growth over 4 years
2000-04
Intensity, Volume,
Technological Change
80%
Medical Inflation
above general inflation
40%
General
Inflation
20%
$1.988 TRILLION
in Health Care
Expenditures
Source: In 2005, total National Health Expenditures were $1.988 trillion, CMS.
The 2005 amount spent on malpractice insurance was $12 billion, according to NAIC
Malpractice Premiums as a Percent of
Physician Gross Income
100% 2005
90%
Percent of Physician Income
80%
70%
60% 52%
50%
40%
30% 19%
20% 12%
10% 4%
0%
Retained as Office Staff Office Malpractice
Personal Expenses Premiums
Source: www.cms.hhs.gov/MedicareProgramRatesStats/downloads/mktbskt-economic-index.pdf 2006, 2005 data
Income
Effect of
Excess HC Cost Growth
NOTES:
4 Health Sectors with Biggest 10-year
Cost Increases, 1995 through 2004
2.4% 4.3% Hospital Care
Source: Calculations by PPI AARP using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
26.8%
9%
9.1%
Dental Services
Administration &
Net Cost of Private Ins
27% Other Prof. Services
Rx Drugs
4.8%
21% Durable Medical Equipment
0.9% 15% Physician & Nursing Home Care
Rx Drugs Clinical Other Personal Health Care
Services Admin. & Net Cost of Priv. Health
Insurance
14.9% Public Health Activity
20.9% Research
0.8%
Structures & Equipment
1.5% 2.8% 4.3%
Good Chronic Care Management Key
to a Large Segment of Cost
SOURCE: Conwell & Cohen, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Statistical Brief #73, March 2005
100%
80
1% of people
60
40 3% of costs for
50% of people
20
Government Business
2004 Election Analysis