Professional Documents
Culture Documents
submission
Concept of Jura Regalia
Universal feudal theory that all lands were held from
the Crown (Carino v. Insular Govt, 41 Phil. 935)
Foundation of the 1st sentence of Sec. 2, Art. XII,
1987 Constitution
In the Republican system of Government, the
medieval concept of jura regalia has been stripped of
its regalian overtones (Lee Hong Kok v. David, 48 SCRA 372)
Important Terms Used In Mining Law
Ancestral lands - Refers to all lands exclusively and
actually possessed, occupied, or utilized by
indigenous cultural communities by themselves or
through their ancestors in accordance with their
customs and traditions since time immemorial, and
as may be defined and delineated by law.
Notes:
Ancestral domain and ancestral lands are not part of lands of
the public domain.
The right of natives does not include natural resources. What is
given is priority rights, not exclusive right.
State not precluded from entering into agreements with private
entities. (Cruz v. Secretary, GR 135385, Dec. 6, 2000)
Block or meridional block - Area bounded by one-half
(1/2) minute of latitude and one-half (1/2) minute of
longitude, containing approximately eighty-one
hectares (81 has.).
Carrying capacity – The capacity of natural and
human environments to accommodate and absorb
change without experiencing conditions of instability
and attendant degradation.
Ecological profile or eco-profile – The geographic-
based instruments for planners and decision-makers
which presents an evaluation of the environmental
quality and carrying capacity of an area.
Environmental compliance certificate (ECC) - The
document issued certifying that the project under
consideration will not bring about an unacceptable
environmental impact and that the proponent has
complied with the requirements of the environmental
impact statement system.
Environmental impact statement (EIS) - The
document which aims to identify, predict, interpret,
and communicate information regarding changes in
environmental quality associated with a proposed
project and which examines the range of alternatives
for the objectives of the proposal and their impact on
the environment.
Foreign-owned corporation - Any corporation,
partnership, association, or cooperative duly
registered in accordance with law in which less than
fifty per centum (50%) of the capital is owned by
Filipino citizens.
Gross output - The actual market value of minerals or
mineral products from its mining area as defined in
the National Internal Revenue Code.
Mine wastes and tailings – The soil and rock
materials from surface or underground mining and
milling operations with no economic value to the
generator of the same.
Minerals - refers to all naturally occurring inorganic
substance in solid, gas, liquid, or any intermediate
state excluding energy materials such as coal,
petroleum, natural gas, radioactive materials, and
geothermal energy.
Ore - means a naturally occurring substance or
material from which a mineral or element can be
mined and/or processed for profit.
Other Mining Terms
Mine – In its specific sense, is a work for the
excavation of minerals, by means of pits, shafts,
levels, tunnels, and others, as opposed to a ‘quarry’
where the whole excavation is open. Whether any
excavation be a mine or not depends on the mode in
which is worked, and not on the substance obtained
from it. (18 R.C.L. 2, pp. 1092-1093 as quoted in Law on Natural
Resources, Pena, pp. 110)
Vein or Lode – A seam or fissure in the earth’s crust
filled with quartz or some other kind of rock in place
carrying gold, silver, or other valuable mineral
deposits named in the statute.
Lode (alteration of the verb lead) - Used by miners to
mean as the formation by which they are led or
guided in the search for ore. A load may contain
more than one vein. The space between the walls or
boundaries of the earth’s crust is called FISSURE and
if in such fissure ore is found although at
considerable intervals and in small quantities, it is
called a LODE or VEIN. A Vein is by no means a
straight line, or of uniform dip or thickness, or
richness of mineral matter, throughout its course.
Apex of vein – Is the uppermost edge of the vein or
the course thereof, in place at or near the surface of
the earth. [Ibid]
Mining Claim – A parcel of land containing precious
metal in its soil or rock, and is often used in mining
parlance as synonymous with the term ‘location’,
which means the act of appropriating a mining claim
on the public domain, according to established laws
or rules. [Watson v. Lederer, 11 Colo. 577,19 Pac. 602, 7 A.S.R.
263, 1 L.R.A. 854; 18 R.C.L. 2, pp. 1092]
Lode Claim – A parcel of mineral land containing a
vein, lode, ledge, lens, or mass of ore in place which
has been located in accordance with law. [Sec. 13, C.A.
137]
Placer Claim – Is that which does not come under the
definition of lode mineral claim. [Ibid]
Assay – A test by means of chemical analysis to
determine the purity of fineness of metals,
particularly precious metals. Hence, gold, silver, and
platinum are assayed for the number of ounces per
ton of ore; while lead, copper, zinc and base metals
are assayed for the percentage of their contents in
the ore. [Morrison, Mining rights, pp. 491-492]
Quarry resources – Any common stone or other
common mineral substances as the MGB Director
may so declare, such as, but not restricted to: marl,
marble, granite, volcanic cinders, basalt, tuff, and
rock phosphate, gabbro, serpentine, inset filling
materials, clay for ceramic tiles and building bricks,
pumice, perlite and other similar materials provided
they contain no metals or other valuable minerals in
economically substantial quantities. [Sec. 2-I, PD 463 &
Sec. 43, R.A. 7942]
Areas Open to Mining Operations
(Sec. 14, IRR)
Public or private lands not covered by valid and
existing mining rights and mining applications;
Lands covered by expired/abandoned/ canceled
mining/quarrying rights;
Mineral Reservations; and
Timber or forest lands as defined in existing laws (?).
Areas Closed to Mining Applications
(Sec. 19)
a. In military and other government reservations,
except upon prior written clearance by the
government agency concerned;
b. Near or under public or private buildings,
cemeteries, archeological and historic sites, bridges,
highways, waterways, railroads, reservoirs, dams or
other infrastructure projects, public or private works
including plantations or valuable crops, except upon
written consent of the government agency or private
entity concerned;
c. In areas covered by valid and existing mining
rights;
e. In areas covered by small-scale miners as defined by law
unless with prior consent of the small-scale miners, in which
case a royalty payment upon the utilization of minerals shall be
agreed upon by the parties, said royalty forming a trust fund for
the socioeconomic development of the community concerned;
and
f. Old growth or virgin forests, proclaimed watershed forest
reserves, wilderness areas, mangrove forests, mossy forests,
national parks provincial/municipal forests, parks, greenbelts,
game refuge and bird sanctuaries as defined by law and in
areas expressly prohibited under the National Integrated
Protected Areas System (NIPAS) under Republic Act No. 7586,
Department Administrative Order No. 25, series of 1992 and
other laws.
Prior Informed Consent From ICCs
(Sec. 16, IRR)
No mining permits to be issued in CADCs/CALCs or
areas actually occupied by Indigenous Cultural
Communities under a claim of time immemorial
possession unless there is PRIOR INFORMED
CONSENT from them, based on their customary laws.
Public notice via: (a) newspaper, radio or television
advertisements, fully disclosing the activity to be
undertaken; and (b) sector consultation thru
community assembly, which notice should be
announced or posted in a conspicuous place in the
area for at least a month before the assembly.
Fraud, external influence and manipulations
prohibited.
Royalty entitled to ICC: 1% of G.O.
Expenses for community development deductible
from royalty.
In case of disagreement concerning the royalty:
Department to resolve the same within three (3)
months.
Royalty to form part of a Trust Fund for the
socioeconomic well-being of the ICC based on the
management plan formulated for such ancestral land
or domain area:
Mining Tenements under R.A. 7942
A. Tenement issued by DENR
1. Exploration Permit
2. Mineral Agreements
- Mineral Production Sharing Agreement
- Joint Venture Agreement
- Co-production Agreement
3. Financial or Technical Assistance Agreement
4. Mineral Processing Permit
5. Industrial Sand & Gravel Permit
B. Permit issued by LGU
1. Quarry Permit
2. Small-Scale Mining Permit
3. Sand & Gravel Permit
Maximum Areas for Exploration
Permit (Sec. 22, IRR as amended by
AO 03-46)
a. Onshore, in any one province
1. for individuals, twenty (20) blocks: and
2. for partnerships, corporations, cooperatives,
or associations, two hundred (200) blocks.
Marble/Granite/Construction aggregates: 81
1,458 (Corp.)
Jurisdiction Of Provincial/City Mining
Regulatory Board (Sec. 70, IRR)
Applications for Quarry, Sand and Gravel, Guano,
Gemstone Gathering and Small-Scale Mining Permits.
Chairman: MGB Director.
Vice-Chair: Governor/City Mayor
Members: SSM rep, LSM rep, accredited NGO
Quarry Permit (Sec.71, IRR)
Area: Not more that 5 hectares.
Term:5 years, renewable for the same period but not
exceeding 25 years.
Where to Apply: Governor/City Mayor through the
P/CMRB.
Commercial Sand/Gravel Permit
(Sec. 72[a], IRR)
Coverage: Extraction, removal and disposition of
sand and gravel and other loose or unconsolidated
materials which are used in their natural state
without undergoing processing.
Area: Not more than 5 hectares.
Term: 1 year, renewable in like periods.
Restriction: 1 permit per person per municipality.
Where to apply: Governor/City Mayor through
P/CMRB
Industrial Sand/Gravel Permit (Sec.
72[b], IRR)
Coverage: Extraction, removal and disposition of
sand and gravel and other loose or unconsolidated
materials that necessitate the use of mechanical
processing.
Area: Not more than 5 hectares at any given time.
Term: 5 years, renewable in like periods but not to
exceed 25 years.
Where to apply: Governor/City Mayor through the
P/CMRB
If area is more than 5 has. but not exceeding 20
has., jurisdiction is with RD, MGB.
Exclusive Sand/Gravel Permit (Sec.
72[c], IRR)
Coverage: Extraction, removal and utilization of sand
and gravel and other loose or unconsolidated
materials from public land for applicant’s own use.
Area: 1 hectare
Term: Not exceeding 60 days, non-renewable.
Limitation: 50 cubic meters maximum & no
commercial disposition.
Gratuitous Permits
Public -Government entity/ instrumentality in need of
quarry, sand and gravel or loose/unconsolidated
materials in the construction of building and/or
infrastructure for public use or other purposes. Term:
1 year; Area: 2 hectares.
Private – Applicant is the landowner himself.
Purpose: extraction, removal and utilization of
quarry, sand and gravel or loose/ unconsolidated
materials from his land. Term: 60 days, non-
renewable. Proof of ownership and personal use of
materials.
Restrictions in Quarrying Operations
No extraction allowed within one (1) kilometer from
the boundaries of reservoirs established for public
water supply, archaeological and historical sites or of
any public or private works or structures.
No extraction allowed in offshore areas within five
hundred (500) meters distance from the coast and
two hundred (200) meters from the mean low tide
level along the beach.
Ore Transport Permit (Sec. 117, IRR,
as amended by AO 2003-46)
Transport of all minerals/mineral products and by-
products, including gold bullions, by Permit Holders,
Contractors, accredited traders, retailers, processors
and other mining rights holders must be
accompanied by an Ore Transport Permit (MGB Form
No. 12‑1) issued by the Regional Director concerned
or his/her duly authorized representative.
Transport of sand and gravel shall be covered by a
Delivery Receipt.
P/CMRF to formulate its own policies to govern such
transport of ores produced by small‑scale miners.
For MPSA & FTAA: OTP included in the agreement.
Prior written notice to MGB required.
OTP not necessary for ore samples not exceeding
two (2) metric tons to be used exclusively for assay
and pilot test purposes. Only certification from MGB
is required.
The absence of a permit shall be considered as prima
facie evidence of illegal mining and shall be sufficient
cause for the Government to confiscate the ores or
minerals being transported, the tools and equipment
utilized, and the vehicle containing the same.
The absence of a permit shall be considered as prima
facie evidence of illegal mining and shall be sufficient
cause for the Government to confiscate the ores or
minerals being transported, the tools and equipment
utilized, and the vehicle containing the same.
Selected Mineral Production Volume
Role of LGUs In Mining (Sec. 8,
IRR, R.A. 7942)
Ensure that relevant laws on public notice, public
consultation and public participation are complied
with;
Approve applications for small-scale mining, sand and
gravel, quarry, guano, gemstone gathering and
gratuitous permits and for industrial sand and gravel
permits not exceeding five (5) hectares;
Share from taxes, fees and charges in accordance
with Sections 290 and 292 of Republic Act No. 7160 ;
Facilitate in the process to achieve an informed
decision on the social acceptability of a mining
project as required by ECC;
Participate in the monitoring of any mining activity as
a member of the Multipartite Monitoring Team;
Participate as a member of the Mine Rehabilitation
Fund Committee;
Recipient of social infrastructure and community
development projects for the utilization of the host
and neighboring communities;
Act as mediator between the ICCs and the Contractor
as may be requested; and
Other powers granted by applicable laws and rules.
Membership in MMT & MRFC;
Recipient of social infrastructure and community
development projects for the utilization of the host
and neighboring communities;
Act as mediator between the Indigenous Cultural
Community and the Contractor if requested.
Grounds Cancellation/ Revocation/
Revocation (Sec. 230, IRR)
Violation of any of the terms and conditions of the
Permits or Agreements;
Non-payment of taxes and fees due the Government
for two (2) consecutive years; and
Falsehood or omission of facts in the application for
Exploration Permit, Mineral Agreement, FTAA or
other permits which may alter, change or affect
substantially the facts set forth in said statements.
Effect of Cancellation/Expiration (Sec.
232, IRR)
Expiration:
- Gov’t to undertake operation or through qualified
independent contractor after bidding.
- Contractor has right to equal highest bid and
reimburse expenses by that bidder.
Cancellation:
Validity of FTAA
La Bugal Jan. 27, 2004 Ruling
Declaring unconstitutional and void:
(1) Section 3 (aq), which defines “qualified
person,” to wit: Provided, That a legally organized
foreign-owned corporation shall be deemed a
qualified person for purposes of granting an
exploration permit, financial or technical assistance
agreement or mineral processing permit.
(2) Section 23 which specifies the rights and
obligations of an exploration permittee, insofar as
said section applies to a financial or technical
assistance agreement.
(3) Section 33, which prescribes the eligibility of
a contractor in a financial or technical assistance
agreement;
(4) Section 35 which enumerates the terms and
conditions for every financial or technical
assistance agreement;
(5) Section 39 which allows the contractor in a
financial and technical assistance agreement to
convert the same into a mineral production-sharing
agreement;
(2) All provisions of Department of Environment and
Natural Resources Administrative Order 96-40, s.
1996 which are not in conformity with this Decision,
and
(3) The Financial and Technical Assistance
Agreement between the Government of the Republic
of the Philippines and WMC Philippines, Inc.
Ratio of the Jan. 27, 2004 En banc
Decision
Accordingly, following the literal text of the
Constitution, assistance accorded by foreign-owned
corporations in the large-scale exploration,
development, and utilization of petroleum, minerals
and mineral oils should be limited to “technical” or
“financial” assistance only.
The phrase “management or other forms of
assistance” in the 1973 Constitution was deleted in
the 1987 Constitution, which allows only “technical or
financial assistance.” Casus omisus pro omisso
habendus est. A person, object or thing omitted
from an enumeration must be held to have been
omitted intentionally
The phrase “service contracts” has been deleted in
the 1987 Constitution’s Article on National Economy
and Patrimony. If the CONCOM intended to retain
the concept of service contracts under the 1973
Constitution, it could have simply adopted the old
terminology (“service contracts”) instead of
employing new and unfamiliar terms (“agreements . .
. involving either technical or financial assistance”).
Service contracts actually vested foreigners with the
right to dispose, explore for, develop, exploit, and
utilize the same. Foreigners, not Filipinos, became
the beneficiaries of Philippine natural resources. This
arrangement is clearly incompatible with the
constitutional ideal of nationalization of natural
resources, with the Regalian doctrine, and on a
broader perspective, with Philippine sovereignty.
There can be little doubt that the WMCP FTAA itself is a
service contract. Section 1.3 of the WMCP FTAA grants
WMCP “the exclusive right to explore, exploit, utilise[,]
process and dispose of all Minerals products and by-
products thereof that may be produced from the
Contract AreaThese contractual stipulations, taken
together, grant WMCP beneficial ownership over natural
resources that properly belong to the State and are
intended for the benefit of its citizens.
These stipulations are abhorrent to the 1987
Constitution. They are precisely the vices that the
fundamental law seeks to avoid, the evils that it aims to
suppress. Consequently, the contract from which they
spring must be struck down.
The Dec. 1, 2004 Reversal
CJ Panganiban speaking:
We should reverse the Decision of January 27, 2004.
Issues:
Does R.A. 7942 & DAO 96-04 allow the unlawful and
Constitution?
ON ISSUE NO. 1
The CAMC FTAA grants in favor of CAMC the right of
possession of the Exploration Contract Area, the full
right of ingress and egress and the right to occupy
the same.
It also bestows CAMC the right not to be prevented
from entry into private lands by surface owners or
occupants thereof when prospecting, exploring and
exploiting minerals therein.
The entry referred to in Section 76 is not just a
simple right-of-way which is ordinarily allowed under
the provisions of the Civil Code.
The provision of the FTAA in question lays down the
ways and means by which the foreign-owned
contractor, disqualified to own land, identifies to the
government the specific surface areas within the
FTAA contract area to be acquired for the mine
infrastructure.
The government then acquires ownership of the
surface land areas on behalf of the contractor,
through a voluntary transaction in order to enable
the latter to proceed to fully implement the FTAA.
Eminent domain is not yet called for at this stage
since there are still various avenues by which surface
rights can be acquired other than expropriation.
ON ISSUE NO. 2
The mere fact that the term service contracts found in
the 1973 Constitution was not carried over to the
present constitution, sans any categorical statement
banning service contracts in mining activities, does not
mean that service contracts as understood in the 1973
Constitution was eradicated in the 1987 Constitution.
The 1987 Constitution allows the continued use of
service contracts with foreign corporations as contractors
who would invest in and operate and manage extractive
enterprises, subject to the full control and supervision of
the State; this time, however, safety measures were put
in place to prevent abuses of the past regime.
ISSUES & CONCERNS
Issues Affecting The Environment
The record of mining companies with regard to
environmental protection, disasters and post-mining
clean-up in the Philippines is widely acknowledged,
even within the government, to be very poor.
As of 2003, at least 16 serious tailings dam failures in
the preceding 20 years and over 800 abandoned
mine sites have not been cleaned up. Clean-up costs
are estimated in billions of dollars and the damage
caused will never be fully reversed.[ A L Clark, (1994 ) The
Phillippines Mineral Sector to 2010: Policy and Recommendations,
Report to the Asian Development Bank on T.A. No 1894-PHI. East-
West Center Honolulu, Hawaii, p360]
Modern mining in the Philippines typically consists of
open-pit mining of low-grade ores for copper and
gold, and strip-mining for nickel.
This involves flattening mountaintops, creating huge
craters and producing vast amounts of waste in the
form of tailings.
Large-scale gold mining is particularly destructive
because it involves the processing of huge volumes
of ground rock, using cyanide to separate gold from
the ore.
The process also releases other potentially harmful
toxic metals, the monitoring of which has been
described as inadequate in certain mining operations
in the Philippines. [Rapu-Rapu Finding and Recommendations
of the Fact-Finding Commission on the Mining Operations in Rapu-
Rapu Island, 19 May 2006, Executive Summary p15]
Large-scale mining has the potential to seriously
exacerbate the problems on flooding, devastating
landslides, siltation and the destruction of biodiversity
areas as result of degradation of forests.
In the Philippines 81 per cent of the globally
important land-based biodiversity areas are in forest
habitats.
It is estimated that 37 per cent of this forest area
may be opened up to new mining. [State of the Philippines
Forest and Important Biodiversity Areas, Harribon Foundation , 27th
July 2007]
Water contamination from mining poses one of the
top three ecological security threats in the world.
[USEPA]
Many mining applications in the Philippines are in
water catchment areas very close to the sea, and
pose a major threat to valuable marine
environments.
In addition a number of companies are proposing to
use submarine tailings disposal (STD) also referred to
as deep-sea tailings placement.
The practice is effectively illegal in Canada and the
United States and has never been proposed for use
in Australia – the home countries of some 11 of the
companies proposing STD in the Philippines.
www.miningwatch.ca/index.php?/Crew/STD_toolki
EIA processing timeframes have been reduced, with
automatic approval if they are exceeded.
Requirements to provide public information have
been relaxed, as has the need to provide notice of
public hearings.
These changes have been accompanied by relaxing
of the controls in the Mining Act.
Taken together, they seriously undermine the
protection afforded by EIAs in the Philippines.
Issues On Violations of Indigenous
People’s Rights
The Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (IPRA, 1997) and
the Mining Code (Republic Act 7942, 1995) guarantee
indigenous peoples the right to free, prior, informed
consent (FPIC) over decisions affecting them and
developments on their lands.
FPIC is defined as: The consensus of all members of
the ICCs/IPs [Indigenous Cultural
Communities/Indigenous Peoples] to be determined in
accordance with their respective customary laws and
practices, free from any external manipulation,
interference or coercion, and obtained after fully
disclosing the intent and scope of the activity, in a
language and process understandable to the
community.
Lack of independent information regarding mining
that is made available to IPs.
Information provided to IPs frequently amounted to
little more than propaganda by mining companies.
Hence, IPs are not in a position to make an informed
choice.
Two common themes during FFT discussions:
(1) Lacked of respect for IPs traditional cultures,
viewing their right to FPIC as a technical obstacle to
be overcome as quickly as possible rather than a
necessary protection of rights; and
(2) Factionalism and misrepresentation.
CBCP Statement on Mining (Jan.29,
2006)
It is government mining policy of offering our lands
to foreigners with liberal conditions while our people
continue to grow in poverty.
The adverse social impact on the affected
communities far outweigh the gains promised by
mining Trans-National Corporations (TNCs).
The right to life of people is inseparable from their
right to sources of food and livelihood. Allowing the
interests of big mining corporations to prevail over
people’s right to these sources amount to violating
their right to life.
Mining threatens people’s health and environmental
safety through the wanton dumping of waste and
tailings in rivers and seas.
Deletion of the nationalist provisions in the
Constitution can pave the way to the wholesale
plunder of our National Patrimony, and undermine
our Sovereignty.
Mining areas remain among the poorest areas in the
country such as the mining communities in CARAGA,
Bicol and Cordillera Regions. The cultural fabric of
indigenous peoples is also being destroyed by the
entry of mining corporations.
The CBCP calls on:
Support to the struggle against all mining projects,
criteria.
The EITI is a coalition of governments, companies,