You are on page 1of 44

Executive Overview

A STRATEGY FOR
PERFORMANCE
EXCELLENCE

1
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
What is Six Sigma?
● Letter in the Greek alphabet (σ )

● “sigma” is a measure of the variation or


spread within a process.

● The sigma value is a metric that indicates


how well a process is performing.

● Six Sigma is a methodology to drive process


improvements by focusing on defect
elimination.

● In Six Sigma philosophy, sigma is a common


language that indicates how often
defects occur in a process.
Six
Six Sigma
Sigma is
is aa philosophy
philosophy and
and aa
methodology
methodology focused
focused on on defect
defect reduction
reduction
2
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Process Performance Metric
σ (or Z) values, are used as a common process capability
metric and can be calculated for all data types.

➲ A good way to visualize Z:

Z is the number of times the standard


deviation will fit between the mean and
the spec limit. x USL
σ 2σ 3σ 4σ

It is a measure of the process variation


relative to the requirements.

➲ Why use Z?

Accepted standard notation for process


performance.

Z numbers are easier to put in


perspective.

3
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Classical View of
Performance
Practical Meaning of 99% Good
✗ 20,000 lost articles of mail per hour
✗ Unsafe drinking water almost 15 minutes per day
✗ 5,000 incorrect surgical operations per week
✗ 2 short or long landings at most major airports each day
✗ 200,000 wrong drug prescriptions each year
✗ No electricity for almost 7 hours each month

3σ Capability 93.32%* Historical Standard

4σ Capability 99.38%* Recent Standard

6σ Capability 99.99966%* Industry Vision

* Long Term Yield assumes 1.5 σ shift.

4
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
The New Equilibrium
σ is a measure of how much
Internal &
External
Prevention & variation exists in a process
Appraisal
Failure
Costs
Costs
Old Belief
Costs

Old Belief
4σ High Quality = High Cost

Quality
Internal & Prevention &
External Appraisal
Failure Costs Costs

Costs
New Belief 4σ
New Belief
High Quality = Low Cost 5σ

Quality

5
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Goal of Six Sigma
σ PPM

2 308,537 80 800000

70 From 5 to 6 700000

3 66,807 60 600000

50 500000

% Change
PPM % Change

PPM
40 400000
4 6,210 30 From 4 to 5 300000

20 200000

233
From 3 to 4

5 10
From 1 to 2
100000

0 0

1 2 3 4 5 6
6 3.4
Process Sigma
Process Defects per Million
Capability Opportunities

* Includes 1.5σ shift

Focusing on σ
Focusing on σ requires
requires thorough
thorough process
process
understanding
understanding and
and breakthrough
breakthrough thinking
thinking

6
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Keys to Defect Reduction

Er
Eliminate the

on

ro
Unnecessary and Make it Difficult

r
a ti
the Confusing to do Wrong

Pr
c
(Kaizen) (Poka Yoke)

e
lifi

ve
mp

nt
ion
Si

Process Capability
Reduce the
Process Variation
(6σ )
Six
SixSigma
Sigmaprovides
providesaamethodology
methodologyandandtool
toolset
set
that
thatcan
canbe
beused
usedto
toidentify
identifyand
andreduce
reducedefects
defects

7
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Key is Reducing Process
Variation Process
Process Reqt
Data

Data
Distribution ● Understand the Causes
Process ● Control the critical factors
Defects

0 1 2 3 4 5

Mission
Mission
Create
Create Robust
Robust Processes
Processes that
that
have
have Minimal
Minimal Potential
Potential to
to
Create
Create Defects
Defects

0 1 2 3 4 5

High Variation +
Poor Centering = Low Variation +
High Defects Centering =
Low Defects

0 1 2 3 4 5

8
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Six Sigma
Methodology
4 Step Methodology for Process Improvement

Process Characterization Process Optimization

1) Measure 3) Improvement
• Identify Project Scope / Goal • Develop Improvement Plan
• Define Key Process Elements • Understand/Optimize Vital
• Establish Process Capability Process Elements
• Validate Measurement System • Reduce Variation / Defects
• Verify Impact
2) Evaluate
• Benchmark Process Measure 4) Control
Entitlement • Implement Long Term
• Data Analysis Control Plan
Evaluate

Control
• Determine Critical • Leverage to Similar
Factors Products/Processes
• Document & Standardize

Improvement
9
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Strategy
Material Environment
Measurements
Methods Process
Output
(Parameters)
Machine
People

Define the Problem / Defect Statement


Y = f ( x1*, x2, x3, x4*, x5. . . Xn)

Y= Dependent Variable Output, Defect


x= Independent Variables Potential Cause
x* = Independent Variable Critical Cause

Use
Use Data
Data to
to Distinguish
Distinguish “Vital
“Vital Few”
Few” from
from “Trivial
“Trivial Many”
Many”

10
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Strategy By Phase
Phase Step Focus

Process Characterization
Measure What is the frequency of Defects? Measure

(What) • Define the defect Y

Control
Evaluate
• Define performance standards Y
• Validate measurement system Y Improve

• Establish capability metric Y


Measure

Evaluate Where, when and why do Defects occur?

Control
Evaluate
(Where, When, Why) • Identify sources of variation X
• Determine the critical process parameters Vital X
Improve

Process Optimization
Improve How can we improve the process? Measure

(How) • Screen potential causes X

Control
Evaluate
• Discover relationships Vital X
• Establish operating tolerances Vital X Improve

Were the improvements effective?


• Re-establish capability metric Y, Vital X Measure

Control
How can we maintain the improvements? Y, Vital X

Evaluate
Control
(Sustain, Leverage) • Implement process control mechanisms
• Leverage project learning's Improve

• Document & Proceduralize

11
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Six Sigma Tools & Modules

➲ Fundamental Quality Tools ➲ Statistical Process Control (SPC)


• Pareto Analysis
➲ Hypothesis Testing
• Process Mapping
• t Test
• Brainstorming
• Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
• Cause-and- Effect
• Homogeneity of Variance (HOV)
➲ Process Characterization • Chi Squared (χ 2)
• Defectives
➲ Linear Regression
• Defects
• Variables Data ➲ Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
➲ Capability Analysis (FMEA)
➲ Measurement System ➲ Short and Long Term Analysis
Evaluation ➲ Power & Sample Size
➲ Design of Experiments

12
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Measu Measure

re

Control
Evaluate
Improve

Define
Define Understand
Understand Collect
Collect Process
Process
Problem
Problem Process
Process Data
Data Performance
Performance

● Defect ● Define Process ● Data Types  Process Capability


Statement - Process - Defectives - Cp/Cpk
● Project Mapping - Defects - Run Charts
Goals ● Historical - Continuous  Understand Problem
Performance ● Measurement (Control or
● Brainstorm Systems Evaluation Capability)
Potential Defect (MSE)
Causes

Understand
Understand the
the Process
Process and
and Potential
Potential Impact
Impact

13
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Define Problem
Measure

Control
Evaluate
✔ What do you want to improve? Improve

✔ What is your ‘Y’?

Reduce
Complaints
(int./ext.)

Reduce Reduce
Defects Cost

What are the Goals?


Problem
ProblemDefinitions
Definitionsneed
needtotobe
bebased
basedon on
quantitative
quantitativefacts
factssupported
supported by
byanalytical
analyticaldata.
data.

14
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Understand Process
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Improve

Map
Mapthe
theProcess
Process

Identify
Identifythe
thevariables
variables--‘x’
‘x’

Measure
Measurethe
theProcess
Process

Understand
UnderstandthetheProblem
Problem--
’Y’
’Y’==function
functionof
ofvariables
variables-’x’
-’x’
Y=f(x)
Y=f(x)
To
Tounderstand
understandwhere
whereyou
you want
wanttoto be,
be,
you
youneed
needto
toknow
knowhow
howto
toget
getthere.v
there.v

15
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Identify Factors - ‘x’
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Improve

From
Fromthe
the
Process
ProcessMap:
Map:
Preheat 2 Solder Pot Cooling
C temp. C pot height C speed
C proximity C solder height N direction
N purity
N solder support
Factors
Factors(x)
(x)
C temp.

N (noise factors):
factors that are uncontrollable, too costly to control or wish not to control.
How
How??
Brainstorm Scommon
✔✔Brainstorm (standard operating procedures):
sense procedures that describe how the process is run and
✔✔Interview
Interview identify certain factors to be monitored and maintained.
✔✔Experience
Experience Typically not parameters that would make sense to test
(e.g., prev. maint., training cleaning)

C (controllable process parameters): factors that can be manipulated to


see their effect on the product parameters.

16
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Collect Data
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Improve

What
Whatdo
doyou
youwant
wantto
toknow?
know?

Process Performance

◆Defects
◆Rework What
Whatdo
doyou
youneed
needto
toknow?
know?
◆Scrap
◆Yield Measurement System
◆Z (Cp/Cpk)
◆Repeatability
◆Reproducibility
Customer Satisfaction ◆Timeliness
◆Complaints ◆Cost
◆Returns ◆Accuracy
◆Service ◆Adequacy
◆Performance

17
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Process Capability Measure

Control
Evaluate
Six Sigma methodology uses data to characterize and drive
process improvements, focusing on centering processes that Improve

are off-target and/or reducing process variation.

LSL USL LSL USL

Off-Target On Target
Low Variation High Variation
High Potential Defects High Potential Defects

LSL USL
●●Variation reduction and process
Variation reduction and process
centering
centeringcreate
createprocesses
processeswith
with
less potential for defects.
less potential for defects.
●●The concept of defect reduction
The concept of defect reduction
applies
appliestotoALL
ALLprocesses
processes(not
(notjust
just
On-Target manufacturing)
manufacturing)
Low Variation
Low Potential Defects
18
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
“The Nature of the Problem”
Measure

Control
Evaluate
LSL USL Improve

Short Term Capability


Time 4 Estimates
Time 3

Time 2

Time 1

Long Term Capability


Estimate

Zlt = Zst - Zsh

Understanding
Understanding short
short &&long
long term
termcapability
capabilityprovides
provides
valuable
valuableinsight
insight into
intothe
the“Nature
“Natureof
ofthe
theProblem”
Problem”

19
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
“The Goal”
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Both fundamental process capability and long term
process control are needed to create and maintain Improve

robust processes.
Ζ st Ζ PPM
lt
2 .5 308,537
3.0
3 1.5 66,807

PM
4 2.5 6,210

P
50
“Control”

5 233

13
3.5
ZShift

1.5 6 4.5 3.4


M

M
PP

Over time, a ‘typical’ process will shift and

PP
drift by approximately 1.5σ (Zsh = 1.5σ )
7
80

3.4
66

6s Goal
Create robust processes
0 3.0 6.0 (Zst > 6σ ) and provide
Zlt = Zst - Zsh Z Short Term long term process control
“Capability” (Zsh < 1.5σ )

20
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Key Process Elements
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Improve

Process capability is based on 3 elements.

Va
g
Is the process centered Is the process in

in
to minimize the

ria
control?

er
potential for defects?

tio
nt
Ce

n
Requiremen t
s
Are the process capabilities and
process requirements compatible?

Process
Process improvement
improvement is is driven
driven by
by
focus
focus on
on these
these 33 elements
elements

21
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Evaluate
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Improve

Assess Identify
AssessCurrent
Current Data
DataAnalysis
Analysis Identify
Process Critical
Critical
Process Factors
Factors

● Establish Process ● Detailed Data ● Apply statistical tools to


Entitlement Collection verify critical factors
● Assess Project Goals ● Eliminate non-critical
factors
● Establish potential
critical factors

●● How
How is
is Process
Process Performing?
Performing?
●● What are Vital Process Elements?
What are Vital Process Elements?

22
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
What is Entitlement?
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Improve

Definition:
Entitlement is the best process capability that can be achieved without
significant investment.

Translation:
Using basically the existing process equipment/technology what is the
expected performance of the “in control” process.

Some Thoughts on Entitlement:


Entitlement is never static - there are always opportunities in a process
for incremental improvement.

The key in understanding entitlement is to know enough about the


process to recognize where the real opportunities lie!

23
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Establishing Entitlement
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Entitlement is based on defining how really good processes Improve

perform and assessing the existing process.


Run Chart for C28

● Short Term Process Capability 0.76

- Best Performance for current process

C28
0.75

0.74

10 60 110 160
Observation

Best Practices
Number of runs about median: 79.000 Number of runs up or dow n: 107.000

● Expected number of runs:


Longest run about median:
81.000
7.000
Expected number of runs:
Longest run up or dow n:
106.333
5.000
Approx P-Value for Clustering: 0.376 Approx P-Value f or Trends: 0.550

- Industry Standards, Journal


Approx P-Value for Mixtures: 0.624 Approx P-Value f or Oscillation: 0.450

Recommendations, World Class Expectations

● Process Benchmarks
- Competitive, Internal, Alternate Businesses

24
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Performance Benchmarking
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Improve

When
Whenyou
youknow
knowwhat
whatyou
youwant
wantto
toknow,
know,try
try
Benchmarking!
Benchmarking!

Your Product/Process/Service

? Identify Differences

● Use Data to determine


Other’s improvement opportunities
Product/Process/Service
● Direct/Indirect Sources

25
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Assess Project Goals
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Improve

Current Process
Performance Project Goal
too passive
Process Performance (σ )

Realistic
Project Goal Process
Entitlement
Project Goal
too aggressive

Time

Assure
Assure Project
Project Goals
Goals are
are Realistic
Realistic and
and Achievable
Achievable

26
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Data Analysis
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Improve

Eliminate
Eliminate“Trivial
“TrivialMany”
Many”
●● Qualitative Evaluation
Qualitative Evaluation
●● Technical Expertise
Technical Expertise
●● Graphical Methods
Graphical Methods
●● Screening Design of Experiments
Screening Design of Experiments Identify
Identify“Vital
“VitalFew”
Few”
●● Pareto Analysis
Pareto Analysis
●● Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis Testing
●● Regression
Quantify Regression
Quantify ●● Design of Experiments
Design of Experiments
Opportunity
Opportunity
●● % Reduction in Variation
% Reduction in Variation
●● Cost/ Benefit
Our Goal:
Cost/ Benefit
Identify the Key Factors (x’s)

27
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Statistical Analysis
Apply statistics to validate actions & improvements

Hypothesis Testing

e
7 30

p ar ans
m e
Co le M ces
5
20
Frequency

Frequency
n
mp aria
4

a
3
10
S V
&
2

0 0

0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020 0.025
New Machine Machine 6 mths

Regression Analysis
Regression Plot
Y = 2.19469 + 0.918549X ● Is the factor really important?
R-Sq = 86.0 %

60

50
● Do we understand the impact for
y
tif s the factor?
40

e n p
Id nshi
Y

30

tio
20

10 Regression

ela ● Has our improvement made an


95% PI
R
h impact
0

5 15 25 35 45 55

bl is
ta
X

Es its ● What is the true impact?


Lim

28
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Understand Variation &
Sample Size
Help us determine whether observed differences are:

statistically significant

or

due to chance
(normal variation / sampling variation)

29
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Establish Critical Factors
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Improve

Process Map (+15 factors) Trivial


Many
Graphical Analysis
(10-15 factors)

FMEA/Multi-Vari/Scatter
e 8-10
ic
D
&
e Screen Design / Regression
il c
S 5-8
DOE / Hypothesis Testing
2-5 Vital
Few

30
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Improve
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Improve

Develop
Develop Optimize
OptimizeKey
Key Reduce
Reduce Verify
Verify
Improvement
Improvement Factors
Factors Variation/
Variation/ Impact
Impact
Plan
Plan Defects
Defects
● Goals ● DOE ● Implement ● Capability
● Benefits ● Process Limits Improvements Analysis
● Timelines ● Control Vital X’s ● Regression
● Resources ● Hypothesis
● Roles Testing
● Responsibilities ● Assess against
Project Goal

Implement
Implement &
& Validate
Validate Improvements
Improvements

31
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Develop Plan
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Improve

Tactics Resources
(how) (who)

Document & Track:


✔ Matrix
Objectives Tactic Goals
✔ Gantt
(what) (how much/when)
✔ Form
✔ Other

Critical Factors Financial Goals


(where) (overall impact)

32
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Focus on Effort & Impact
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Improve

(Lower Cost, Variation Reduction, etc)


High

Impact

Low
Low High
Effort
(Time, Resources, Investiment,etc)

Focus
Focus on
on High
High Impact,
Impact, Low
Low Effort
Effort Improvement
Improvement Opportunities
Opportunities

33
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Reduce Variation/Defects
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Improve

Identify
IdentifyControllable
Controllable
Improvements
Improvements

Focus Controls
on Vital Xs

Mistake
Mistake Statistical
Statistical Visual
Visual
Proofing
Proofing Process
Process Indicators
Indicators
Control
Control ✔Visual Management
✔Poka-Yoke
✔Fixtures ✔Pull systems
✔Control Charts
✔Systems
✔Control Limits

34
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Optimize Factors Measure

Control
Evaluate
Use Design of Experiments to understand and Improve

optimize process settings

Perform
PerformExperiment
Experiment Interpret
InterpretResults
Results

High ● Main Effects


● Interactions
B High ●
Main Effects Plot - Data Means for Thickness

Significance
C
Cleaner Copper Zinc
Low 0.000620

Low
Low
A High 0.000595

Thickness
0.000570

0.000545

0.000520

0% 90
% 0 %
71
% 0 %
67
%
10 10 10

Optimize
Optimize Prediction
PredictionModel
Model
● Reduce Variation Y = A + Bx1 + Cx2 + D x1x2 + ...
● Reduce Defects

35
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Control Process Factors
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Reduce defects by focusing control on process inputs Improve

(X’s) not the output (Y)


Regression Plot
Before
Before Y = 2.19469 + 0.918549X
R-Sq = 86.0 %
LSL USL

σ = 1.5 60
Process
USL
50 Variation

(Y)
40
Specification

Process Output
Limits

Y
30

0 20 40 60 80

20

10
LSL Process Regression
95% PI
Limits
LCL UCL
After
0

After
5 15 25 35 45 55
LSL USL
ProcessXInput (X)
Before
After
σ =3
Reduce
Reduce Variation
Variation to
to gain
gain
process
process performance
performance andand
10 20 30 40 50
expand
expand process
process limits
limits

36
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Verify Improvements
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Use statistical tools to validate the process improvements Improve

Process Performance
Before After
7

0
-10.16 -0.06 10.05 20.15 30.25 40.36 50.46 60.56 70.67 -2.40 6.61 16.71 26.81 36.92 47.02 57.13 67.23 34.64

Comparison of Distributions
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0
-10.16 -0.06 10.05 20.15 30.25 40.36 50.46 60.56
Before After

Did Using ls
Did we
we make
make aa real
real improvement?
improvement? e rify l Too
Do
Do we
we have
have enough
enough data
data to
to tell?
tell? V tica
t is
What
What is
is the
the true
true impact!
impact! Sta

37
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Control
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Improve

Implement
Implement Leverage
Leverageto
to Document
Document&&
Control
ControlPlan
Plan other
otherProcesses
Processes Standardize
Standardize
● SPC ● Similar Processes ● Procedures & Work
● FMEA ● Like Products
Instructions
● Process Capability ● Update Systems
● Update Control
Plan

✔ Assure
✔ Assure Controls
Controls in
in Place
Place to
to Maintain
Maintain Improvements
Improvements
✔ Look
✔ Look for
for Leverage
Leverage Opportunities
Opportunities

38
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Failure Modes & Effects
Analysis
Process control plan linked to potential product / process failures.

C Actions Results
S l O D R
Process Function Potential Failure Potential Effect(s) of Potential Cause(s) / Current Process Target
E a C E P Recommended Action(s) Resp S O D R
Reqts Mode Failure Mechanism(s) of Failure Control(s) Date Actions Taken E C E P
V s C T N
s V C T N

0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0

RPN = Severity (SEV) x Occurrence (OCC) x Detection (DET)


Rank
Rank Severity
Severity Occurrence
Occurrence Detection
Detection
1 Transparent Remote Certain Best
Best
2
FMEA
FMEA minimizes
minimizes risk
risk of of Product
Product // 3
4
Process
Process failures
failures by
by linking
linking each
each 5
potential
potential failure
failure to
to aa potential
potential 6

failure
failure mode/cause
mode/cause and and evaluating
evaluating
7
8
the
the associated
associated risksrisks (RPN)
(RPN) 9
10 Endangerment Certain Remote Worst
Worst

FMEA risk analysis considers Severity, Occurrence and Detection

39
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Process Control
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Develop effective mechanisms to maintain control of Improve

process improvements

Before After
I Chart for C5 by C6
2
80
70
60
Other Examples of Control Mechanisms:
Individual Value

50
40 1
30 ● Go/No Go Gages for process inputs
3.0SL=31.84

20
10
X=16.12
● Error Proof Designs
0
-10
● Poka Yoke Techniques
-3.0SL=0.3996

0 50 100 ● Equipment Indicator Lights


Observation Number
SPC ● Etc.
SPC

Apply
Apply controls
controls to
to process
process inputs
inputs --
Xs
Xs (not
(not necessarily
necessarily output
output -- Y)
Y)

40
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Control Plan
Measure

Control
Evaluate
Update process control plan to maintain improvements Improve

X4 * X5 X6
X3
X2 Process
Output
(Parameters)
X1*

Now we Understand the Problem / Defect Statement


Y = f ( x1*, x2, x3, x4*, x5, X6)

Vital
Vital Factors
Factors included
included in
in Process
Process Control
Control Plan
Plan

41
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Rebenchmark Process
Performance
Previous Process
Performance

Co
nt rol
Pla New Process
n
Expectation

Adequate
Adequate Controls
Controls in
in Place
Place to
to Maintain
Maintain Improved
Improved Process
Process

42
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Leveraging Measure

Control
Evaluate
Improve

● Understand Drivers
✔Improvement applied to specific part / problem

● Apply learnings
✔Across part families
✔Like processes
✔Similar technologies

43
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved
Six Sigma Summary
4 Step Methodology for Process Improvement

Measure
Characterize Process

Evaluate Control
Understand Process Maintain New Process

Improve
Improve and Verify Process

Roadmap
Roadmap for
for Performance
Performance Excellence
Excellence

44
 2000, QualityToolBox.com, LLC, all rights reserved

You might also like