Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION TO SEM
The scanning electron microscope (SEM) uses a focused beam of high-energy electrons to generate a variety of signals at the surface of solid specimens. Hi- magnification >100,000X and greater depth of field up to 100 times as compare to OM. Moreover, very high resolution than OM. The SEM is also capable of performing analysis of selected point locations on the sample; this approach is especially useful in qualitatively or semi-quantitatively determining chemical compositions (using EDS).
Essential Components
Essential components of SEM include the following:
Electron Source (W-filament or LaB6 in thermionic guns) Electron Lenses (electrostatic and electromagnetic) Sample Stage Detectors for all signals of interest (e.g. SE detector, BSE detector, EDS, etc.) Display / Data output devices SEM always have at least one detector (usually a secondary electron detector), and most have additional detectors depending upon requirements.
Produced by inelastic interactions. SE energy level is only 3 ~ 5 eV. Can be easily collected The maximum escape depth is about 5 nm in metal and 50 nm in insulators.
Backscattered electrons (BSE) Produced by elastic interactions. BSE energy level is about 60 ~80 % of incident one. Special detector is required to collect BSE.
ii)
iii)
X-rays
Large escape depth due to difficulty of x-ray absorption Energy and wavelength of x-ray can be used for chemical analysis, i.e.
i) Energy-Dispersive spectroscopy, EDS ii) Wavelength-Dispersive spectroscopy, WDS
A position vacated by an ejected inner shell electron is eventually occupied by a higher-energy electron from an outer shell. To be able to do so, however, the transferring outer electron must give up some of its energy by emitting an X-ray.
The amount of energy released by the transferring electron depends on which shell it is transferring from, as well as which shell it is transferring to.
Figure. - Elements in an EDX spectrum are identified based on the energy content of the X-rays emitted by their electrons as these electrons transfer from a higher-energy shell to a lower-energy one.
Analytical Information
a) Qualitative Analysis: Sample x-ray energy values from the EDS spectrum are compared with known characteristic x-ray energy values to determine the presence of an element in the sample. Elements from Be to U can be detected. Quantitative Analysis: Quantitative results can be obtained from the relative x-ray counts at the characteristic energy levels for the sample constituents. The accuracy of standard less analysis depends on the sample composition. Greater accuracy is obtained using known standards with similar structure and composition to that of the unknown sample. Elemental Mapping: Characteristic x-ray intensity is measured relative to lateral position on the sample. Variations in x-ray intensity at any characteristic energy value indicate the relative conc. for the applicable element across the surface.
b)
c)
d)
Line Profile Analysis: SEM beam is scanned along a pre-selected line across the sample while x-rays are detected for discrete positions along the line. Analysis of the x-ray energy spectrum at each position provides plots of the relative elemental concentration for each element versus position along the line.
Advantages of EDX
Complete compositional information within few seconds Low cost as compared to WDX Simple and easy to operate the system Convenient to identify elements Good for elements with higher Atomic Numbers (Z) Low Background
Limitation of EDX/EDS
There are energy peak overlaps among different elements, particularly those corresponding to x-rays generated by emission from different energylevel shells (K, L and M) in different elements.
EDS cannot detect the lightest elements, typically below the atomic number of Na for detectors equipped with a Be window.
Necessary requirement of Liquid Nitrogen.
Gas detectors are used for WDX analysis. A WDS detector is known as a gas-filled or gas proportional counter.
Another commonly used detector is Scintillation detector.
WDS crystal and optics are expensive and have more failure modes.
In a WDS system, about 30% of the X-rays entering the detector are actually counted whereas in an EDS system, almost 100% are counted.