Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dezie AJ, Silvestri F, Liriano E, Benotti P American College of Surgeons, September 2000
Study Design
Prospective, randomized study of midline fascial closure technique in gastric bariatric patient Conducted between 1991-1998 331 consecutive morbidly obese patients 2 groups randomized:
Group 1: Continuous fascial closure (n=172) Group 2: Interrupted fascial closure (n=159)
Study Design
Patients randomized intraoperatively by odd/even MRN at time of fascial closure Randomized suture material (Nylon vs PDS) 4 different surgeons performing surgery Wounds monitored for 30 days post-op End points
superficial wound complications (superficial infections, seromas and haematomas) Deep wound complications (deep surgical infections and fascial dehiscence)
Table 1
Conclusions
No significant differences between techniques in incidences of superficial complications Continuous fascial closure were associated with fewer deep complications Similar outcomes were observed with both monofilament suture materials Continuous fascial closure reduces major acute wound complications in morbidly obese patients undergoing gastric operations
Strengths
Reasonable patient numbers Prospective randomized trial Comparing surgical technique and suture material Clear endpoints
Weakness
Inclusion criteria not stately clearly Randomization method (not double blinded) Ordered categories to show adequacy of randomization technique (patient factors, co-morbidities) Identification of complications by surgeons (bias) Data collection ?independent source
Author's conclusions
To reduce the incidence of incisional hernia without increasing wound pain or suture sinus frequency, slowly absorbable continuous sutures appear to be the optimal method of fascial closure.
Adequate suture length (suture length to wound length ratio of at least 4:1)