Professional Documents
Culture Documents
But first
In what step(s) of the methodology is financial feasibility analysis relevant?
task 1 Meeting with top management a: task 1 Form a Team and inform staff b: task 1 Pre-assessment to collect general information c: task 1 Select focus areas d: task 1 Prepare assessment proposal for top management approval e:
Step 1 Assessment :
task 1 Staff meeting and training a: task 1 Prepare focus area flow charts b: task 1 Walkthrough of focus areas c: task 1 Quantify inputs and outputs and costs to establish a ba seline d: task 1 Quantify losses through a material and energy balance e:
Introduction
Technical
Other
- Regulatory - Organizational - Health/safety - Community
Project Selection
Environmental
Financial
Introduction
Initial investment costs Annual operating costs and savings Cost of operating inputs Cost of waste management Less tangible costs Revenues
2. Determine availability of internal investment funds for bigger projects 3. Obtain external financing for remaining projects
5
Introduction
How to allocate available capital between different projects If additional capital is needed
6
Introduction
Introduction
Improvement
Modify existing equipment, processes, and management and information systems to improve efficiency, reduce costs, increase capacity, improve product quality, etc.
Replacement
Replace outdated, worn-out, or damaged equipment or outdated/inefficient management and information systems
8
Cash Flow
Cash Flow
Inflow
Equipment salvage value
Annual Other
Cash Flow
Cash Flow
Salvage Value: resale value of equipment or other materials at the end of the project
12
Cash Flow
Timing
End of project:
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
TIME
Time zero:
Initial Investment
13
Cash Flow
Incremental Analysis
Needed for many CP or EE projects Compares cash flow of implemented options to the business as usual cash flow Covers only the cash flows that change
14
Profitability Indicators
Definition: a single number that is calculated for characterisation of project profitability in a concise and understandable form Common indicators
1. 2. 3. 4. Simple Payback Return on Investment (ROI) Net Present Value (NPV) Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
15
1. Simple Payback
Definition: number of years it will take for the project to recover the initial investments Usually a rule of thumb for selecting projects, e.g. payback must be < 3 years Simple Payback (in years) Investment Cash Flow
16
2. Return on Investment
Definition: the percentage of initial investment that is recovered each year
Initial Investment Simple Payback = (in years) Year 1 Cash Flow Year 1 Cash Flow Initial Investment
3 years
ROI (in %)
33%
17
Workshop Exercise
INVENTORY
Solid scrap
Solid scrap
to waste management
to waste management
18
Workshop Exercise
QC camera system costs US$105,000 to purchase and install 40% reduced scrap and operating costs
19
Workshop Exercise
Question 1: Calculate annual cash flows using the cash flow worksheet (15 min) Question 2: Calculate simple payback (5 min)
20
21
Inflation
Money loses purchasing power over time as product/service prices rise, so a dollar today can buy more than a dollar next year
inflation 5%
costs $1
now
costs $1.05
next year
22
Return on Investment
A dollar that you invest today will bring you more than a dollar next year having the dollar now provides you with an investment opportunity
Investing $1 now Investment Gives you $1.10 a year from now
23
$ 2,933,204
$ 105,000
$ 2,894,741
(in US$)
24
Question
Is the annual savings of $38,463 per year for 3 years a sufficient return on the initial investment of $ 105,000?
25
26
27
End of project
$38,463
$38,463
$38,463 TIME
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Time zero:
28
29
At a discount rate of 20%, how much do I need to invest if I want to have $17,280 in 3 years? $17,280 1.20 x 1.20 x 1.20 = $10,000
30
31
1 2 3 4 5 10 20 30
.7692 .7142 .5917 .5102 .4552 .3644 .3501 .2603 .2693 .1859 .0725 .0346 .0053 .0012 .0004 .0000
33
0 1 2 3
36
Sensitivity Analysis
In business as usual scenario PLS Company needs waste water treatment plant in year 3: $150,000 investment
With QC project: $95,000 Savings: $55,000
Year
PV Factor
0 1 2 3
39
Disadvantages
Neglect TVM Neglect out-year costs Do not indicate project size
Considers TVM Needs firms discount rate Indicates project size Considers TVM project size Requires iteration Does not indicate
40
41
Acknowledgements
This training session was prepared as part of the development and delivery of the course Energizing Cleaner Production funded by InWent, Internationale Weiterbildung und Entwicklung (Capacity Building International, Germany) and carried out by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) The session is based on the presentation Financing Cleaner Production and Energy Efficiency Projects from the Energy Efficiency Guide for Industry in Asia developed as part of the GERIAP project that was implemented by UNEP and funded by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida). www.energyefficiencyasia.org The workshop exercise is taken from Profiting from Cleaner Production, in Strategies and Mechanisms For Promoting Cleaner Production Investments In Developing Countries, developed by UNEP
42