Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Strategic evaluation is the strategic management process phase in which managers provide assurance that the chosen strategy is implemented and is meeting business objectives. By this time, plans are already specified, activities assigned, resources provided, policies in place and leadership system and style formed. There is a need for:
An evaluation and control system, A reward system and An effective information system
Introduction Cont.
Helps to recycle feedback into new strategic planning Double-checks strategic choice for appropriateness & consistency with the environment
Are decisions consistent with policy? Are there sufficient resources? Is the environment still as anticipated? To what extent are targets being met? Are the plans still relevant or should they be changed?
C & E Process
1.
2. 3. 4.
The organisation structure and style provide the main mechanism. There are 4 inter-related activities in the evaluation process: Establishing targets, standards & implementation plans. Measuring actual performance Analysing deviations Determining necessary modifications
Evaluation should take place at different organisation levels review levels The corporate level executive
Evaluates overall corporate strategy Monitors SBU evaluation It inter-connects elements financial elements of the plan
The budget, however, lacks nonfinancial and other assumptions for strategic control.
In charge of strategy information system but without line responsibility Internal audit committees Executive committees at board level External auditors
Motivation to evaluate Top managers must be motivated to evaluate Unwillingness to evaluate is a common cause of strategy failure Failure experience may increase motivate to evaluate Performance reward for achievement of objectives also increases motivation to evaluate.
Top management rewards in many firms, are done irrespective of strategy evaluation
Executives make proposals to the board for themselves These include salary changes and promotions
Strategic demands should guide the reward system. Performance measures should be established in time before the actual implementation Rewards should then be based on these standards after the actual performance.
Significant environmental effects on performance should not have a big impact on the managers penalty
There is need for rotations Enough time should be allowed to individuals Rewards and penalties should consider performance of predecessors
It is often difficult to tie cause-effect relationships of strategic unit performance In case of failure, there is room for
Everyone to defend oneself Presenting results as successful e.g. short-term results, promise for long-term success. Claim responsibility for good performance
Control & Evaluation Areas There are 3 major areas where managers make decisions: Criteria for evaluation Feedback system and control areas Outcomes of strategic evaluation
Criteria for evaluation Evaluation can be based on objective or subjective factors Criteria depend on the evaluation purpose and situation Quantitative factors (supported by some qualitative factors) are more relevant for the past and present Qualitative factors are more relevant for testing whether the strategy will be applicable or not.
The guide should come from key success factors for strategy success
Qualitative Criteria Subjective assessment should supplement quantitative performance measures More appropriate to the entire organisation strategy evaluation especially before a major change of direction There are 3 broad qualitative criteria categories
Workability
Addresses Feasibility Stimulation managers commitment, consensus among executives, personal aspirations among executives.
Measuring Feedback
Timing of measurement What feedback to provide
Reading Assignment
2.
Why managers spend more time on strategic panning and less on control. Types of control
Strategic plan control, Annual plan control and Profitability and efficiency controls