Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6-4
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
1. NATURE: Which audit
procedures to use (cont’d)
What are some other examples of audit
procedures?
What is the audit objective(s) for the audit
procedure that you identified?
6-5
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
2. EXTENT: What sample size to
select for a given procedure
The sample size will vary depending upon
– The sampling method chosen
– The type of test (e.g. test of controls vs. test of
details)
– The amount of assurance to be obtained from
the test
Professional judgment and firm procedures
help in deciding sample size
6-6
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
3. SELECTION: Which particular
items to select from the population
Once the sampling method has been
determined, then the sample size will be
identified (see previous overhead)
Then, we can actually choose the item.
Method of selection will depend upon
sampling method, e.g. interval sample,
high dollar items, random sample, etc.
6-7
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
4. TIMING: When to perform the
procedures
When are we likely to conduct tests of
controls?
What about tests of details?
What are some other factors that affect the
timing of the conduct of tests (audit
procedures)?
6-8
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
A list of audit procedures is called:
An audit program
6-10
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Persuasive evidence (Table 6-2)
Persuasive evidence is
1. Appropriate
– Relevant and reliable
2. Sufficient
3. Timely
6-11
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Evidence and buying a used car
If you were assessing
the quality of a used
car that you were
thinking of buying,
what type of evidence
would you gather?
How is this similar to
the audit process?
6-12
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Appropriateness of evidence
Relevance: pertaining to the audit assertion
being tested
Reliable: depends upon a number of
factors, including who examined the
evidence, the state of the client’s systems,
and the type of evidence collected.
6-13
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Reliability of evidence
Auditor’s direct knowledge
Independence of provider
Effectiveness of client’s internal controls
Qualifications of individuals providing the
information
Degree of objectivity
6-14
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Reliability: Auditor’s direct
knowledge
Evidence obtained directly by the auditor
What is an example of evidence that the
auditor could collect directly with each of
the following techniques?
– Physical examination
– Observation
– Reperformance
– Inspection
6-15
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Reliability: Independence of
provider
Evidence obtained from a source outside
the entity is more reliable than that
obtained from within
What are some examples of outside
sources of information that are typically
used by the auditor?
6-16
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Reliability: Effectiveness of client’s
internal controls
When a client’s internal controls are
effective, evidence obtained internally is
more reliable than when controls are weak
What are some of the indicators of strong
internal controls?
Of weak internal controls?
6-17
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Reliability: Qualifications of
individuals providing the
information
Individuals providing information should
be competent and qualified to do so
How would you judge the qualifications of
the providers of bank confirmations?
Of accounts receivable confirmations?
6-18
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Reliability: Degree of objectivity
6-19
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Practice problem 6-22 (p. 180)
Deciding on evidence
Which evidence is
more reliable?
Why?
6-20
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Combined effect
The auditor needs to consider all of the
evidence factors together, i.e. combined
effects of sufficiency, appropriateness and
timeliness
Part of the evidence gathering decision is
related to the tradeoff of the cost of
gathering evidence versus its
persuasiveness
6-21
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Methods of collecting evidence:
Match the type of evidence to the example
Example
Types of evidence Request details of bank
Physical examination balances from the bank
Confirmation Count inventory
Note quality of inventory
Documentation
Match receiving slip to
Observation invoice
Inquiries of the client Ask about credit granting
Reperformance processes
Compare current and prior
Analytical procedures gross profit
Recalculate gst paid
6-22
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Practice problem 6-21 (p. 179)
Learning to identify
the type of evidence
Also, matching audit
procedures to general
balance-related audit
objectives
6-23
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
How do we choose evidence types?
6-24
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Analytical procedures play a crucial
role
6-25
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Important reasons for using
analytical procedures
To help understand the client’s business
Assessment of the entity’s ability to
continue as a going concern
To identify the presence of possible
misstatements
To reduce detailed audit tests (by being a
form of evidence)
6-26
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Practice problem 6-23 (p. 180)
Let’s look at the advantages of using
analytical review
What are the reasons why certain account
balances may differ from prior years?
6-27
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Analytical review process
Conducted during all phases of the audit
Client information can be compared to:
– Industry data
– Prior-period data
– Client-determined expected results
– Auditor-determined expected results
– Non-financial data
6-28
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
“Quick and easy” analytical review
6-29
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Practice problem 6-26 (p. 181)
Here, analytical
review has already
been completed for
you
Practise deciding
whether these results
require follow up or
not …
6-30
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada