Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Chapter 11 objectives
Examine the four different types of audit
tests
How does the auditor choose evidence mix:
the types of audit tests to be completed?
Discuss the process for designing an audit
program
Describe the audit strategy and the four
phases of the financial statement audit
11-2
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Types of audit tests
Procedures to obtain an understanding of internal control
+
Tests of controls
+
Analytical procedures
+
Tests of details of balances
=
Sufficient competent evidence per GAAS
11-3
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Practice problem 11-20 (p. 336)
Assessing evidence mix
Why do different work on the same
cycles at different locations?
11-4
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Procedures to obtain an understanding of
internal control
11-6
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Tests of controls (review)
Transaction-related audit objectives:
– Occurrence
– Completeness
– Accuracy
– Classification
– Timing
– Posting and Summarization
11-7
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Tests of controls
Audit tests used for tests of controls:
– Inquiry
– Examination
– Observation
– Reperformance
Similar to procedures used to obtain an
understanding of controls
11-8
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Tests of controls are …
Audit procedures designed to verify whether the
client’s controls match the auditor’s
understanding of those controls (as documented
in flowcharts or questionnaires).
Examples include:
– Examination of employee time cards for
approval of overtime hours worked.
– Examination of journal entries for proper
approval.
11-9
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Methodology for designing tests of
controls
Perform procedures to understand internal
control
Assess control risk
Evaluate cost-benefit of testing controls
Design tests of controls to meet
transaction-related audit objectives (audit
procedures, sample size, items to select,
timing)
11-10
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Dual-purpose tests
A substantive test is a procedure designed to test
for dollar amounts of errors or fraud and other
irregularities directly affecting the correctness of
financial statement balances
When an auditor conducts an auditing procedure
that is both an internal control test and a
substantive procedure it is a dual-purpose test
11-11
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Tests of details of balances
Substantive procedures are performed in
order to detect material misstatements at
the assertion level. Consist of:
– Tests of details of balances, that focus on the
ending general ledger balances and
– Analytical procedures
– Dual-purpose tests
11-12
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Analytical procedures (review)
Purpose:
– Understand business
– Assess going concern
– Identify potential misstatements
– Reduce tests of detail
Procedures:
– Compare to industry
– Compare to prior years
– Calculate ratios/trends
– Inquiry for follow up
11-13
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Tests of details of balances
Balance-related audit objectives:
– Existence
– Completeness
– Realizable value
– Accuracy
– Classification
– Cut-off
– Detail Tie-in
– Rights and Obligations
– Presentation & Disclosure
11-14
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Tests of details of balances
Audit tests:
– Physical examination
– Direct communication
– Examine documentation
– Client inquiry
– Reperformance (includes mechanical
accuracy)
11-15
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Examples of tests of details
Examination of vendor invoices in
support of amounts recorded for
purchases of inventories
Recalculation of payroll amounts
Physical examination of inventory
11-16
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Which evidence is used for which
type of audit test?
Physical examination (tests of details)
Confirmation (tests of details)
Observation (Understanding of & tests of
controls)
Inquiry (all four types)
Mechanical accuracy or reperformance
(tests of controls and tests of details)
Analytical procedures
11-17
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Practice problem 11-15 (p. 334)
Check your
understanding of
audit tests
Identify the
purpose of each
audit test and
identify the
evidence
11-18
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Evidence mix: it is a trade-off of
Low cost versus high quality of the audit
tests
– Analytical procedures
– Tests of controls
– Tests of details
Auditor uses professional judgment to
determine the mix of audit tests
11-19
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Practice problem 11-19 (p. 335)
Three different situations
What type of evidence mix would you
recommend?
11-20
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Designing the audit program
Most audits use a combined approach:
includes both tests of controls and
substantive procedures
The audit program is normally split into
three parts:
– Tests of controls
– Analytical procedures
– Tests of details
11-21
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Analytical procedures
Are conducted at each phase of the audit:
– During knowledge of business would include
overview calculations and comparisons to
other business or within the industry
– Use of analytical procedures during other
phases is discussed in Chapter 6 and within
each chapter that examines specific transaction
cycles
11-22
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Methodology for designing tests of
controls
11-23
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Tests of controls audit program
Based upon the descriptive section documenting
the understanding obtained about internal control
If cost-beneficial, tests of controls would be
conducted for key controls upon which the
auditor intends to rely
Audit program is normally listed in a
performance format (i.e. in the order in which
tests will be conducted)
11-24
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Practice problem 11-16
(pp. 334-35)
Practice
distinguishing
between manual,
computer-assisted or
fully automated
controls
Identify how these
controls would be
tested
11-25
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Before we design substantive tests
for accounts receivable we
need to:
Set audit risk (overall)
Set materiality (overall and assertion)
Assess inherent risk (overall and assertion)
Assess control risk for sales and collection
cycle and at the assertion level
Design, predict results for and conduct
tests of controls and analytical procedures
for sales and collection cycle
11-26
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Methodology for designing tests of
details of financial statement balances–
accounts receivable
11-27
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Comparing two situations
Results of assessed Results of assessed
control risk: Good control risk: Poor
– Results of tests of – No tests of controls
controls: Good completed
Results of analytical Results of analytical
procedures: Good procedures: Good
– Minimal tests of – Medium tests of
details required details required
11-28
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Comparing two more situations
Results of assessed Results of assessed
control risk: Good control risk: Poor
– Results of tests of – No tests of controls
controls: Good completed
Results of analytical Results of analytical
procedures: Poor or procedures: Poor or
not performed not performed
– Medium tests of – Extensive tests of
details required details required
11-29
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Review of audit phases
11-30
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Practice problem 11-21 (p. 336)
Test your
understanding of the
audit process
What is the order of
task completion?
11-31
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada