Professional Documents
Culture Documents
14-2
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Methodology for designing tests of
details of balances for accounts
receivable
14-3
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Audit tests to be performed are
based upon assessed risks
14-4
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Effects of inherent and control risks
14-5
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Materiality considerations
Unless the organization is highly
automated (e.g. with EDI, electronic data
interchange), accounts receivable may be
one of the largest amounts on the balance
sheet
Transactions throughout the year that build
the sales and accounts receivable balances
are also normally significant
14-6
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Inherent risk considerations
Inherent risk tends to be moderate to low
for all assertions except:
– Realizable value (due to the judgment
involved in assessing collectability) and
– Cut-off for sales returns or allowances (in
particular, warranty allowances or returns of
goods on consignment may be difficult to
estimate)
14-7
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Figure 14-1 and figure 14-2
14-1: After procedures to obtain an
understanding and tests of controls we do
tests of details
14-2: Designing tests of details rests on the
previous work that has been done in the
cycle
14-8
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Consider the relationship between transaction-
related and balance-related audit objectives
14-9
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Analytical procedures
Completed during three phases of the
audit:
– Planning (Phase I)
– As part of substantive testing (Phase III)
– As part of completing the audit engagement
(Phase IV)
14-10
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Using analytical review to target detailed tests
(see table 14-1)
14-13
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Examples of audit procedures by audit
objective (assertion), Table 14-4 (cont’d)
14-15
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Examples of audit procedures by audit
objective (assertion), Table 14-4 (cont’d)
14-16
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Practice problem 14-25 (p. 450)
A company is having
collection problems
What would you do to
investigate the
causes?
14-17
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
The power of confirmations
Useful for existence,
accuracy and cutoff
A/R confirmations
come in several
forms:
– Negative
– Positive
• Individual item
• Balance owing
14-18
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Practice problem 14-24 (p. 450)
Confirmations have
been returned with
answers that do not
match the records –
what do you do?
14-19
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Positive vs. negative confirmations
Positive confirmations
– More reliable evidence
– Possible to conduct follow up if not answered
Use When
– Individual balances relatively large
– Fewer debtors
– Evidence or suspicion of fraud or serious error
14-20
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Positive vs. negative confirmations
Negative confirmations
– Failure to reply must be regarded as a correct
response
– Less expensive
Used When
– Many homogenous balances
– Small amounts owing
– Internal controls strong
– No evidence/suspicion of fraud or serious error
14-21
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Controlling and managing the
confirmation process
1. Controlling the sending of confirmations
2. Procedures for those accounts the client
does not want confirmed
3. Handling returned confirmations
4. Timing of alternative procedures and
second requests
(All of the above illustrate components that
affect the cost of this audit procedure.)
14-22
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
1. Controlling the sending of
confirmations
The client may assist in preparing the
confirmations, but the auditor must due the
actual mailing, off the client premises
If the client stuffs and stamps the
envelopes, this must be supervised
Return envelopes should bear the auditor’s
address, not the client’s
14-23
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
2. Procedures for those accounts the
client does not want confirmed
Where the client does not want to have an
account confirmed that has been selected
by the auditor, this account needs to be
treated like a non-response
This means that the auditor will apply
alternative procedures to the amount
14-24
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
3. Handling returned confirmations
14-25
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Types of differences
Differences between the client records and the
confirmation could be due to:
– Payment already made by the client (a potential cut-
off error or simply due to the postal service)
– Goods were not received (a cut-off error, a potential
credit note, or timing difference)
– Goods were returned (requiring a credit note)
– Amounts are in dispute (perhaps requiring an
allowance)
14-26
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
4. Timing of alternative procedures
and second requests
Second (or even third) requests can be sent
if there is time
Such follow-up requests also need to be
carefully controlled by the auditor
Alternative procedures are designed to
provide adequate evidence with respect to
existence, accuracy and cut-off
14-27
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Nature of alternative procedures
Review of subsequent cash receipts
Examination of duplicate sales invoices
Examination of supporting shipping
documentation
Review of correspondence between the
client and the customer
14-28
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Sampling and accounts receivable
14-29
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada
Practice problem 14-23 (p. 450)
Evaluate the sampling
approach
Select the sample size
Evaluate results
14-30
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada