Statistical Methods and Click to edit Advanced Master subtitle style Application

Multiple Comparison Procedure For Use With Friedman Test ( Comparing All Treatments With A Control )
5/5/12

Learning Outcome
At the end of this lesson student should be able to:

Compute all treatments with a control and compare of two or more treatments, of which one is control condition by using Friedmens Test.

5/5/12

Assumptions
The

data consist of b mutually independent samples (blocks) of size k, the number of treatments, excluding the control condition. by xi0 and xij (i = 1, ,b and j = 1,,k) the responses to the control and the jth treatment in the ith block of a randomized complete block design. 5/5/12

Represent

 Hypotheses
Case A Case B Case C

H0 : Mj M0 H0 : Mj M0 H0 : Mj = M0 H1 : Mj < M0 H1 : Mj > M0 H1 : Mj M0

5/5/12

t
Block 1 2 : : b

Test Statistic
Treatment 0 X10 X20 : : Xb0 1 X11 X21 : : xb1 k X1k X2k : : Xbk

Signed differences ,dij = xij - xi0 Number of minuses sign, rj Number of pluses sign,b - rj
5/5/12

Continue

Decision Rule

Case A

Reject H0 if the number of + sign critical value.

Case

Reject H0 if the number of - sign critical value.

Case

Reject H0 if the number of - sign or number of + sign (smaller) critical value.

5/5/12

5/5/12

Back

5/5/12

CASE

HYPOTHESIS

TEST STATISTIC dij = xij xi0

rj= No. of pluses

DECISION

H0 : Mj M0 H1 : Mj < M0

Reject H0 if the number of + sign critical value.

H0 : Mj M0 H1 : Mj > M0

dij = xij xi0

rj = No. of minuses

Reject H0 if the number of - sign critical value.

H0 : Mj = M0 H1 : Mj5/5/12 M0

dij = xij xi0

rj= No. of minuses or

Reject H0 if the number of - sign or number

Example
A paint manufacturer wished to compare three newly proposed with the standard formula currently in use for manufacturing a particular type of house paint. The response variable was a composite score that incorporated several properties that measure paint quality. Since the effective quality of paint is affected by the surface to which it is applied, 5/5/12 the company researches applied

Table 7.13 FORMULA SURFACE A B C D E

Number of minuses sign, rj Number of pluses sign, b - rj
5/5/12

0( Stand ard) 13 12 15 14 13

1 25 27 29 21 31

2 17 15 19 9 27

3 25 25 23 13 21

Solution
Hypotheses: A high score indicates a higher
quality

Case B: Formula 1 H0 : M1 M0 H1 : M1 > M0 (claim) Formula 2

5/5/12

Table 7.13 FORMULA SURFACE A B C D E

Number of minuses sign, rj Number of
5/5/12

0( Standa 1 2 3 rd) 13 25(+12) 17(+4) 25(+15 ) 12 27(+15) 15(+3) 25(+13 ) 15 29(+14) 19(+4) 23(+8) 14 13 21(+7) 9(-5) 13(-1) 31(+18) 27(+14 21(+8) ) 0 1 1 5 4 4

An experimentwise error rate, = 0.10 Refer table A.15 for k = 3 (treatment) b = 5 (surfaces) Critical Value = 0
5/5/12

5/5/12

Decision:
Formula

Since 0 0 (critical value) Reject H0

Formula

Since 1 > 0 (critical value) Do not reject H0

Formula

Since 1 > 5/5/12 0 (critical value)

Conclusion:
Formula

There is enough evidence to support the claim that a high score indicates higher quality.
Formula

There is not enough evidence to support the5/5/12 claim that a high score

EXERCISES

5/5/12

Exercise 1
Syme and Pollard* conducted an experiment to investigate the effect of different motivation levels on measures of food-getting dominance in the laboratory rat. The data shown in Table 7.10 are the amounts of food in grams eaten by eight male hooded rats following 0 as control condition 24 5/5/12 and 72 hours of food deprivation.

Table 7.10 : Amount of food, grams, eaten by eight rats under three levels of food deprivation Hours of food deprivation Subject 0 24 72 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
4.5 15.3 9.6 7.2 6.8 4.7 10.1 9.3
5/5/12

5.9 8.1 8.1 8.6 8.1 5.9 9.5 7.9

13.9 12.6 8.1 6.8 14.3 4.2 14.5 7.9

Exercise 2
A paint manufacturer wished to compare three newly proposed with the standard formula currently in use for manufacturing a particular type of house paint. The response variable was a composite score that incorporated several properties that measure paint quality. Since the effective quality of paint is affected 5/5/12

Table 7.13

Surface A B C D E

Formula 0 13 12 15 14 13
5/5/12

1 25 27 29 21 31

2 12 10 13 9 11

3 11 9 12 13 10

Exercise 3
Syme and Pollard* conducted an experiment to investigate the effect of different motivation levels on measures of food-getting dominance in the laboratory rat. The data shown in Table 7.10 are the amounts of food in grams eaten by eight male hooded rats following 0 as control condition 24, 72 and 96 hours of food deprivation. A higher amount of food indicates more effects to the three levels of food deprivation. Let = 0.05
*Syme, G. J., and J. S. Pollard, The Relation between Differences in 5/5/12 Level of Food Deprivation and Dominance in Food Getting in the Rat,

Table 7.10 : Amount of food, grams, eaten by eight rats under three levels of food deprivation Hours of food deprivation Subject 0 24 72 96 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4.5 15.3 9.6 7.2 6.8 4.7 10.1 9.3 5.9 8.1 8.1 8.6 8.1 5.9 9.5 7.9 13.9 12.6 8.1 6.8 14.3 4.2 14.5 7.9 5.6 19.8 15.3 14.4 8.9 10.1 12.5 14.7

5/5/12

Link to youtube :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gI0

5/5/12

Thank you..

5/5/12